Bulldozers first screens

[chew*]

I wouldn't trust to much stuff guys other than what frank from cpu-z posted.

Even if someone did leak anything atm I would not call it "accurate" enough performance wise to be able to draw conclusions.

[w0mbat]

Until we get a real leak from a credible person/website,all of this is just BS. But credible sources won't break the NDA,so there won't be real leaks until the launch date...Which is under NDA too

well, if u collect money so i can live the rest of my life w/o work i might break it

[flippin_waffles]

well, if u collect money so i can live the rest of my life w/o work i might break it

+1 that's what I was thinking.

They probably couldn't care less what happens if they are compensated well enough.

[ReKcOlNu]

Well its faster in that CPU test than my 955-C2 OC'd to 3.75GHz. But the scores max @ 7.9, mine ran 7.4 so it really dosent tell us anything.

Which is why the guy used it , and probably won't even get into trouble.
If it is fake then he did a good job!

Stupid Windows benchmark...I get same score as you @ 3.4GHz...
X2-550(C2) unlocked to X4-965(3.4GHz)..score: 7.4
2x2GB DDR3-1333 @ 9-9-9-24-30-1T.......score: 7.5
Win7 Ultimate(SP1)

[chew*]

well, if u collect money so i can live the rest of my life w/o work i might break it

+1 that's what I was thinking.

They probably couldn't care less what happens if they are compensated well enough.

yep sure.......so here's how the scenario breaks down, if someone was stupid enough to give you enough money to break it and a company found out about this transaction, ( not hard to track accounts paypal or otherwise )

They sue you for all of it plus demand more.......

The other rule of being under NDA is that people don't know your under NDA.....those claiming they have parts but are under NDA.....are just trying to look cool.

[Lightman]

3.4GHz X6 1090T scores 7.6 (not fake)

[w0mbat]

The other rule of being under NDA is that people don't know your under NDA.....those claiming they have parts but are under NDA.....are just trying to look cool.

thats not really true.

[chew*]

thats not really true.

It surely is.

Only people that would have silicon atm is partners.

Otherwise it would be some early crap silicon found on black market.

It's very simple logic.

I am not under NDA atm nor do I have silicon and I work close with all parties in question , that should tell the majority of you alot.

[w0mbat]

well, there are many NDAs that dont tell the signer he cant say hes under a NDA. any at this point there are more samples out than u think. not only partners, but some media guys too.

[chew*]

well, there are many NDAs that dont tell the signer he cant say hes under a NDA. any at this point there are more samples out than u think. not only partners, but some media guys too.

Most people that are under NDA and are smart do not draw attention to themselves. That means they don't go shouting I have parts but am under NDA......

Like i said there are parts out, functional parts. Final silicon though? I tend to doubt that.

[w0mbat]

i wouldnt call that smart. i really have to hold myself together sometimes. i just love spreading news

[blindbox]

Pretty clear the windows cpu description was edited, doesn't even show up on the analysis. (besides being a different font and blindingly obvious anyways.)

You can change CPU-Z's font pretty easily. It's in the config file at the same folder as the cpu-z exe.

[chew*]

i wouldnt call that smart. i really have to hold myself together sometimes. i just love spreading news

News?

There are 2 types of news......

Grocery store checkout magazine racks. ( inquirer )

Actual newspapers. ( new york times )

Most of the stuff in this thread smell's like inquirer to me.

[hatter]

Until we get a real leak from a credible person/website,all of this is just BS. But credible sources won't break the NDA,so there won't be real leaks until the launch date...Which is under NDA too

Isn't the launch at E3?

[RussC]

Theres not final silicon out? Wow, the release is ~3weeks away. I would hope theres final silicon somewhere?

RussC

Like i said there are parts out, functional parts. Final silicon though? I tend to doubt that.

[sniper_sung]

Most probably a major flaw of the photoshop work if fake:







The so called "true" ss:

[flippin_waffles]

yep sure.......so here's how the scenario breaks down, if someone was stupid enough to give you enough money to break it and a company found out about this transaction, ( not hard to track accounts paypal or otherwise )

They sue you for all of it plus demand more.......

The other rule of being under NDA is that people don't know your under NDA.....those claiming they have parts but are under NDA.....are just trying to look cool.

Yeah, good point. Well I guess is just one of the problems of the internet. June can't come soon enough, I may have to disconnect my connection for a couple weeks.

[freeloader]

Most people that are under NDA and are smart do not draw attention to themselves. That means they don't go shouting I have parts but am under NDA......

Like i said there are parts out, functional parts. Final silicon though? I tend to doubt that.

If AMD doesn't have final silicon out by now, then I doubt we would be looking at any kind of June timetable for a launch. I'm pretty sure they have final silicon out by now.

[BeepBeep2]

If AMD doesn't have final silicon out by now, then I doubt we would be looking at any kind of June timetable for a launch. I'm pretty sure they have final silicon out by now.

What chew* said are partners / secret others do not have final silicon. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist internally.

[chew*]

If AMD doesn't have final silicon out by now, then I doubt we would be looking at any kind of June timetable for a launch. I'm pretty sure they have final silicon out by now.

Final silicon in endusers hands? No.

I never said they did not have final silicon.......

[XRL8]

If partners, is mobo makers, oem ,developers, server guys, than yea, partnes should suffice.This leaves out only media really, which dosnt need to have final silicon yet.

"i wouldnt call that smart. i really have to hold myself together sometimes. i just love spreading news "

Than spread em man .register somewhere under weird nickname, do cpuz plus cinebench and make us all happy

[chew*]

Theres not final silicon out? Wow, the release is ~3weeks away. I would hope theres final silicon somewhere?

RussC

Really 3 weeks hard launch?

So AMD is going to release a cpu they claim only will be officially supported by 990 chipset when no boards are out or ready for market?

I'm sure we would see board leaks with current cpu's......at the very minimum.

AMD made it quite clear that any support on older boards they have nothing to do with.

[jimbo75]

I am not under NDA atm nor do I have silicon and I work close with all parties in question , that should tell the majority of you alot.

If saying you are under NDA breaks the NDA, and you are saying you aren't under NDA...does that mean you are under NDA (really)?

Also maybe you don't have silicon because OMG ITS GRAPHENE INSTEAD!!! EVERYBODY GO MENTAL AMD IS BACK.

[Leeghoofd]

Than spread em man .register somewhere under weird nickname, do cpuz plus cinebench and make us all happy

If you are respectfull to the NDA, the companies will treat you alike... break the rules and you might loose the support you have been building up for years... for what ? Bragging rights ? Look mum I have one... nah...

[RussC]

Good point, but there seems to be unamimous consent that BD release is between June7 to the 15th, in or around CBit. If thats wrong, then thats going against all we know so far. Will it be a announced release with no silicon...that would really suck also. We know with some non-fake screenies from China that 990 boards do exist. It possible also they will have silicon out w/o 990 release for the current AM3+ MB's? Thats pure speculation on my part.

I believe there won't be a large performance hit with BD running in AM3+ current crop of MB's!

RussC

Really 3 weeks hard launch?

So AMD is going to release a cpu they claim only will be officially supported by 990 chipset when no boards are out or ready for market?

I'm sure we would see board leaks with current cpu's......at the very minimum.

AMD made it quite clear that any support on older boards they have nothing to do with.