Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 97 of 97

Thread: Critical Design Flaw Found in WD Caviar Green HDDs

  1. #76
    Registered User Hawk-NGO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by lutjens View Post
    Why anyone would buy a consumer level drive is beyond me. For only a small increase in price, you get a much better drive (the RE series) that is manufactured to a MUCH higher standard. If you value your data at all, the RE series is an excellent investment, especially for very large drives.
    Greens are really cheap.. and some of us are really poor. lol.
    Last edited by Hawk-NGO; 06-07-2011 at 04:10 AM.

  2. #77
    Registered User Hawk-NGO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by don_xvi View Post
    Back when this was news a couple of years ago, linux was the only problem because it liked to access drives for journaling or something every 5 seconds and the idle time was set to 3 seconds back then. I haven't seen anything in WD Greengate 2011 to make me think it's even as big of a problem now as it was then.
    Some Windows apps are affected too (FileZilla e.g.).

  3. #78
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    547
    Thanks don

    Net result: I cbf toying with wdidle. For minimal use, my counts are maybe too high (htpc has been turned on maybe for a month nonstop)... but <4000.... who cares.
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Today: "MPAA threatens to disconnect Google from the Internet"
    Tomorrow: "Google removes MPAA term from its search engine"
    Day after tomorrow: "No one remembers who or what MPAA is , nor cares anymore"

  4. #79
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by Serra View Post
    That sounds about right. "Green" drives are really good for bulk data only... eg. media, not your OS disk. As long as you use them that way they're fantastic... of course it's just about impossible to convey that to the general public.
    Yeah... I have six of these drives and only one I had to RMA. Reliability is not bad if u use them for what you should (=media storage).

    Any way to make the wdidle utility work in 64bit windows? I dont have a live dos cd i think...

    SB Rig:
    | CPU: 2600K (L040B313T) | Cooling: H100 with 2x AP29 | Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3
    | RAM: 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1866 | Video: MSI gtx570 TF III
    | SSD: Crucial M4 128GB fw009 | HDDs: 2x GP 2TB, 2x Samsung F4 2TB
    | Audio: Cantatis Overture & Denon D7000 headphones | Case: Lian-Li T60 bench table
    | PSU: Seasonic X650 | Display: Samsung 2693HM 25,5"
    | OS: Windows7 Ultimate x64 SP1

    +Fanless Music Rig: | E5200 @0.9V

    +General surfing PC on sale | E8400 @4Ghz

  5. #80
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Europe/Slovenia/Ljubljana
    Posts
    1,540
    Quote Originally Posted by lutjens View Post
    Why anyone would buy a consumer level drive is beyond me. For only a small increase in price, you get a much better drive (the RE series) that is manufactured to a MUCH higher standard. If you value your data at all, the RE series is an excellent investment, especially for very large drives.
    The other option is getting a RE class drive which is not RE. In WD's case, Caviar Black 2TB is identical drive to the RE4, except it's not tested so rigorously and that it comes with a much lower price tag. So in theory you can expect similar reliability and durability, it's just not proven by the vendor, which adds up the price for RE4. But yeah, if you really value your data you need to go for the server class hardware which is designed for very high workloads in very bad conditions for very long contiguous periods of operation. But that comes with a higher price tag. I was not far from buying a RE4 2TB but then decided for the regular Caviar Black 2TB. I value the data but not that much. For now.
    Intel Core i7 920 4 GHz | 18 GB DDR3 1600 MHz | ASUS Rampage II Gene | GIGABYTE HD7950 3GB WindForce 3X | WD Caviar Black 2TB | Creative Sound Blaster Z | Altec Lansing MX5021 | Corsair HX750 | Lian Li PC-V354
    Super silent cooling powered by (((Noiseblocker)))

  6. #81
    Visitor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    676
    Just got some WD30EZRX 3TB Green drives. Good thing I remembered this thread. All idle timers were set to 8 seconds. I used wdidle3_1_05 to disable the timers.

  7. #82
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    US, MI
    Posts
    1,680
    Quote Originally Posted by The Duke View Post
    did you turn the idle timer off or what?
    Yep I disabled the counters, if i need to park the heads I could always set windows to do that at a 15min timer or something, which would be more reasonable (I don't use driving idling though).

    Quote Originally Posted by Hawk-NGO View Post
    Greens are really cheap.. and some of us are really poor. lol.
    I got them because they were alot cheaper then the blacks, and because they used half the wattage.
    If I had money I would buy 2x of those new 500meg/s ssd's and raid them(60gig, $100 each), then perhaps 2 or 4 3tb?(depending on price) greens, if I can run the tler program on them (for raid).

    Quote Originally Posted by RealTelstar View Post
    Yeah... I have six of these drives and only one I had to RMA. Reliability is not bad if u use them for what you should (=media storage).

    Any way to make the wdidle utility work in 64bit windows? I dont have a live dos cd i think...
    No you gotta use dos.
    If need be you can use easybcd to create a floppy boot entry for you boot menu and boot dos from there .
    It would be plain easier I think to just burn a dvd with dos on it, it's all up to you though.

    I used win95 osr2.1 dos, win98 se dos would be fine too.
    Winme dos, well, that might be fine too, it's just that in the past I've had a few bad board flashes with winme dos while win95 dos worked fine.

    Do you need an iso pre-made for you?, It wouldn't be much trouble for me to make one.
    Last edited by NEOAethyr; 06-24-2011 at 01:18 AM.

  8. #83
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    ithaca, ny
    Posts
    2,431
    that's funny. this already happened once in the 80s
    E8400 8x500=4000 | ABIT IP35-E
    2x2GB Tracer PC2-6400 1:1 500MHz 5-5-5-15 2.0V
    Galaxy 8800GT 800/2000/1100 1.3V | 80GB X25-M G2 + 1.5TB 7200.11 | XFiXG
    Fuzion | MCW60 | DDC2+Petra | Coolrad22T+BIP1

    Merom 13x133=1733 1MB L2 0.950V

  9. #84
    Visitor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    676
    Checked a 6 month old 2TB Caviar Black yesterday. WDIDLE was set to 12.8 seconds from the factory.

  10. #85
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    .ca
    Posts
    476
    So is this problem fixed ? Or i just get a Hitachi 2TB since its dirt cheap...
    i9 9900K/1080 Ti

  11. #86
    Xtreme X.I.P. MaxxxRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles, Ca USA
    Posts
    12,551
    And this is why I only buy the WD Black drives. No one has a bad word to say about these wonderful drives, and I doubt they ever will.

  12. #87
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    No(r)way
    Posts
    452
    The WD blacks are too noisy, draw too much power and are more expensive than other drives, imo. There you go They are simply overkill in most raid configured NASes due to constrictions in other parts.
    Obsolescence be thy name

  13. #88
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    my blacks arent noisy?

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  14. #89
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    No(r)way
    Posts
    452
    It seems like they got better, but over 20 dB for a harddrive is too much for my liking:
    ACOUSTICS

    WD Caviar Black 2TB

    The first generation 1TB Caviar Black was one of the loudest hard drive we've ever tested, measuring >21/25 dBA@1m (idle/seeking) in our anechoic chamber. While nowhere close to current quiet HDD leaders, the new 2TB version is a huge improvement, generating 5 dBA less when idle, and about 3 dBA less when seeking.
    http://www.silentpcreview.com/article1079-page5.html

    I wish someone made something like 3300rpm harddrives for pure storage purposes (way overkill for USB 2.0 or most NASes anyway), focused on silence and reliability. All of the drives I have seen that are supposed to focus on reliability are 7200rpm drives, and I bet they are not quiet enough for my liking.
    Obsolescence be thy name

  15. #90
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    AB. Canada
    Posts
    827
    well they do have 5400 RPM drives,
    These drives have "IntelliPower"
    A fine-tuned balance of spin speed,
    transfer rate, and caching algorithms
    designed to deliver both significant
    power savings and solid performance.
    Additionally, WD Caviar Green drives
    consume less current during startup
    allowing lower peak loads on systems
    as they are booted.
    now what RPM they actualy run at ... not sure


    "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" - (Einstein)

  16. #91
    Visitor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    676
    Quote Originally Posted by TurboDiv View Post
    So is this problem fixed ? Or i just get a Hitachi 2TB since its dirt cheap...
    You can disable the idle timer...not sure about the other problems. One of the 2 week old 3TB WD30EZRX drives I got already needs an RMA. It had a Current Pending Sector Count. After running DLGDiagv519 to analyze/fix the issue, it now has an Offline Uncorrectable Sector. I don't trust the drive now....got some Ultrastar drives coming. Maybe they'll fair better.

  17. #92
    Crunching For The Points! NKrader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Renton WA, USA
    Posts
    2,891
    Quote Originally Posted by STEvil View Post
    my blacks arent noisy?
    mine are def way louder than my greens. and in a bad case they are way louder.. got a pair of 750gb blacks for my parents rig.. put em in the gateway case... sooo loud..

    Quote Originally Posted by cx-ray View Post
    You can disable the idle timer...not sure about the other problems. One of the 2 week old 3TB WD30EZRX drives I got already needs an RMA. It had a Current Pending Sector Count. After running DLGDiagv519 to analyze/fix the issue, it now has an Offline Uncorrectable Sector. I don't trust the drive now....got some Ultrastar drives coming. Maybe they'll fair better.
    guarentee you will have problems with all drives.. its not like huge companies like wd just drop the ball for years.. everyone has bad HD's.. so you can hop around as much as you want. but drives will still go bad and bread no matter the name on the box.

    thats my 2cents

  18. #93
    Visitor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    676
    Quote Originally Posted by NKrader View Post
    guarentee you will have problems with all drives.. its not like huge companies like wd just drop the ball for years.. everyone has bad HD's.. so you can hop around as much as you want. but drives will still go bad and bread no matter the name on the box.

    thats my 2cents
    I have nothing against WD in general. Actually, I prefer them. However, I need some 3TB drives for a RAID setup in a NAS. I tried the WD Green drives against the recommendation of the manufacturer. One drive failed and I'm rethinking the issue. Maybe it's smarter not to take the risk of using them for a purposes that the manufacturer doesn't recommend.

    WD doesn't currently have 3TB enterprise drives for sale. So, I had to look for an alternative.
    Last edited by cx-ray; 07-12-2011 at 04:30 AM.

  19. #94
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    .ca
    Posts
    476
    WOW !!! I just got a new WD Green 2TB and this thing is blowing away my aging Seagate 7200rpm 16mb cache. The green does a crazy 95 MB/sec average transfer rate compared to 60 MB/sec average for my old 7200rpm Seagate. This WD is impressing me even with a 5000 rpm speed. Good job WD, im glad i got it now. No issue so far, but than again i only own it for about 6 hours...
    i9 9900K/1080 Ti

  20. #95
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    VA, USA
    Posts
    932
    Turbo, That comes from the increase of aerial density.
    Just imagine they have 7200rpm drives with the same Aerial density.


    ^^^^
    Click me

  21. #96
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    1,331
    I'm having problems to use the wdidle program, so i'm planning to replace my 4 GP with a more reliable model (3x 2TB units).

    http://www.hardware.fr/articles/831-6/disques-durs.html

    Question #1: are the RE4-GP without this idiot intellipark? It seems not according to WD spec sheet.
    Are normal RE-4 is fine to use without a raid controller?
    The 2TB caviar black does NOT seem reliable enought to me. And i cannot afford a raid 1 (+controller card) of all units i need.

    SB Rig:
    | CPU: 2600K (L040B313T) | Cooling: H100 with 2x AP29 | Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3
    | RAM: 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1866 | Video: MSI gtx570 TF III
    | SSD: Crucial M4 128GB fw009 | HDDs: 2x GP 2TB, 2x Samsung F4 2TB
    | Audio: Cantatis Overture & Denon D7000 headphones | Case: Lian-Li T60 bench table
    | PSU: Seasonic X650 | Display: Samsung 2693HM 25,5"
    | OS: Windows7 Ultimate x64 SP1

    +Fanless Music Rig: | E5200 @0.9V

    +General surfing PC on sale | E8400 @4Ghz

  22. #97
    Visitor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    676
    Got a new WD30EZRX from WDC RMA. It looks like a complete redesign. Almost as if they stuck it into a Caviar Black housing.

    WD30EZRX Date 03 JUL 2011 weight:735g
    WD30EZRX Date 12 APR 2011 weight:639g

    The Caviar Black weighs 737g

    BTW, WDIDLE was still set to 8 seconds on the new 3TB drive

    DSC00449.JPG
    DSC00452.JPG
    Last edited by cx-ray; 07-16-2011 at 11:55 AM.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •