Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: 8-10 pairs of QDC in One Loop?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    1,905

    8-10 pairs of QDC in One Loop?

    Hello LC section

    I'm looking for kind of a gut feeling here, but would you fellas feel that doing 8-10 sets of VL3N QDC in a single loop with 2 DDC 3.2 in series would be a good idea? I was toying with the idea of isolating every single component making loop changes extremely easy.

    Thanks for the input!
    -


    "Language cuts the grooves in which our thoughts must move" | Frank Herbert, The Santaroga Barrier
    2600K | GTX 580 SLI | Asus MIV Gene-Z | 16GB @ 1600 | Silverstone Strider 1200W Gold | Crucial C300 64 | Crucial M4 64 | Intel X25-M 160 G2 | OCZ Vertex 60 | Hitachi 2TB | WD 320

  2. #2
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    8-10 VL3N pairs would be like having two AC aquagrafx480 blocks in your loop. With two DDC3.2s though, you'd still get functional (above .7GPM) with multiples of a wide range of blocks though.


  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Flying through Space, with armoire, Armoire of INVINCIBILATAAAAY!
    Posts
    1,939
    what about... say, 3 pairs of VL4Ns? those are way fatter. also, only 3 pairs.

    E: but with 1xD5 rather than 2xDDC
    Sigs are obnoxious.

  4. #4
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    A VL4N pair is a little less restrictive than the Danger Den block in above chart. A VL3N pair is a little less restrictive than the EK block in the above chart.

    2.5x VL4N pair is roughly equal to 1 VL3N pair. So 3 VL4N pairs is roughly as restrictive as the EK block above, which isn't bad at all for the functionality they bring

  5. #5
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    5,693
    Using the estimator as a rough guess:

    Assuming a low restriction CPU block, some tubing, common D5 pump = 1.74GPM

    Adding 10 VL3N = .73GPM

    Adding a second pump in series would bring you up to 1.14GPM.

    So while a couple is no problem, running 10 of them would likely bring you under 1 GPM, you might want to plan on throwing another pump in line if you wanted to keep flow rates up.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    1,905
    I had feared under 1 GPM as well. Thanks for the input fellas. I see here that the VL4N's are roughly twice as "free flowing" as the VL3N QDC. But 8 sets with an XT and FC block still brings me a little low and I'm not happy with that, despite the XT's low flow resilience.

    Thanks for the data estimates, Vapor and Martin. You fellas always manage to make the picture clearer. May have to stick another pump inline.
    -


    "Language cuts the grooves in which our thoughts must move" | Frank Herbert, The Santaroga Barrier
    2600K | GTX 580 SLI | Asus MIV Gene-Z | 16GB @ 1600 | Silverstone Strider 1200W Gold | Crucial C300 64 | Crucial M4 64 | Intel X25-M 160 G2 | OCZ Vertex 60 | Hitachi 2TB | WD 320

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    14
    So what your telling me is that if I plan a loop of:

    2 x XSPC RX360
    1 x XSPC Rasa CPU Block
    1 x Reservoir
    8 sets x Koolance VL3N

    A D5/MCP655 cranked all the way up may not cut the mustard?

    Before anyone points it out, yes I understand this is overkill for a CPU only loop.
    Core i7 920 @ 3.8 Ghz 1.24375v | 6 GB OCZ DDR3 | Asus P6T | Crucial C300 64 Gig | Seagate Barracuda 1 TB
    ASUS EAH 4890 TOP | Silverstone DA1000w | Corsair H50 | Coolermaster ATCS 840 All Black with window mod
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64
    My Rig --- http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1475598

  8. #8
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by patriot71 View Post
    So what your telling me is that if I plan a loop of:

    2 x XSPC RX360
    1 x XSPC Rasa CPU Block
    1 x Reservoir
    8 sets x Koolance VL3N

    A D5/MCP655 cranked all the way up may not cut the mustard?

    Before anyone points it out, yes I understand this is overkill for a CPU only loop.
    You'd be fine...over .7GPM, I'd guess (possibly a little bit over .75GPM, actually). And the Rasa is pretty good at low flow.

    A second D5 might get you to around 1GPM (.7GPM * sqrt(2)), but would not be worth more than 1C, I'd estimate.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    You'd be fine...over .7GPM, I'd guess (possibly a little bit over .75GPM, actually). And the Rasa is pretty good at low flow.

    A second D5 might get you to around 1GPM (.7GPM * sqrt(2)), but would not be worth more than 1C, I'd estimate.
    Last question.

    In your experience, if I reduced the number of QDC's to only 2 sets (CPU block), do you believe I would see a significant decrease in temperatures due to the increased flow rate?
    Last edited by patriot71; 03-22-2011 at 05:11 PM.
    Core i7 920 @ 3.8 Ghz 1.24375v | 6 GB OCZ DDR3 | Asus P6T | Crucial C300 64 Gig | Seagate Barracuda 1 TB
    ASUS EAH 4890 TOP | Silverstone DA1000w | Corsair H50 | Coolermaster ATCS 840 All Black with window mod
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64
    My Rig --- http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1475598

  10. #10
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Maybe ~1C improvement

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    14
    Thank you much!
    Core i7 920 @ 3.8 Ghz 1.24375v | 6 GB OCZ DDR3 | Asus P6T | Crucial C300 64 Gig | Seagate Barracuda 1 TB
    ASUS EAH 4890 TOP | Silverstone DA1000w | Corsair H50 | Coolermaster ATCS 840 All Black with window mod
    Windows 7 Ultimate X64
    My Rig --- http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1475598

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •