http://news.softpedia.com/news/AMD-B...s-187009.shtml
Original source (Dutch)
http://www.hardware-infos.com/news.php?news=3856
Anyone heard about it ?
IF that's true , I hope ASUS Crosshair IV formula in the list
http://news.softpedia.com/news/AMD-B...s-187009.shtml
Original source (Dutch)
http://www.hardware-infos.com/news.php?news=3856
Anyone heard about it ?
IF that's true , I hope ASUS Crosshair IV formula in the list
It is not true. I know.
And is this true?
Cebit 2011 : After all what we can say up to now it will Not come to the demonstration of bulldozer CPUs on the Cebit in 2011. Obvious AMD has still changed his plans from that point of view.
-Core i9 7980XE @4,20Ghz Vcore:1,10V
-Asrock X299 Taichi XE
-Custom water-cooling loop
-16Gb Corsair DDR4 3200Mhz
-Samsung 970 evo Plus 500Gb
-Samsung 960 evo 250Gb
-Samsung 850 evo 500Gb
-Samsung SH-S223Q
-Asus RTX 2080 Dual OC
-Cooler Master HAF 932
-Seasonic Prime 1300W Gold
Test results are always welcome with this Chess Test where all your cores/threads will run @100% ,Thanks
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post5259523
Isn't the physical socket altered to prevent this?
Building a special BIOS version? ROFL. Um, we already know that the sockets are physically different...
Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!
Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
can mod the socket to get around the difference, just like 478 to 479.
question is whether it will work or not without proper microcodes and some electrical reworking.. like some 478 to 479....
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
omg, again this sh*t...942 pins AM3+ cant be compactible with 941pins AM3, its simple!
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
That's not impossible, just slightly pointless (like the 790FX Socket 939 board from ASRock ). That's an AM3+ board with an old socket. There's nothing in that article which mentions backwards support for current CPUs.
Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!
Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
Oliverda, this is somethin diferent...This is not AM3 board, but AM3+ board with older chipset . But socket is socket and cant join AM3+ Zambezi to AM3 socket
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
Bulldozer is ONLY supported in AM3+ sockets. This comes straight from the desktop guys.
bulldozer may have the same pinout as am3 cpus; but supposedly work only in am3+ mobos;
or maybe ES sample send to mobo makers have am3 pinout and that permited them to run in am3 normal mobos with severe feature handicap;
we did not see any picture of a sample zambezi to actual see if they have only am3+ pinout;
TAMGc5: PhII X4 945, Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P, 2x Kingston PC2-6400 HyperX CL4 2GB, 2x ASUS HD 5770 CUcore Xfire, Razer Barracuda AC1, Win8 Pro x64 (Current)
TAMGc6: AMD FX, Gigabyte GA-xxxx-UDx, 8GB/16GB DDR3, Nvidia 680 GTX, ASUS Xonar, 2x 120/160GB SSD, 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gb/s, Win8 Pro x64 (Planned)
Only AM3+ will support Zambezi. No idea how some manufacturers could make such a mistake and propel a "rumor" like that.
What's stopping people from getting a lawsuit going with board manufacturers lieing to consumers? I have a feeling the manufacturers would blame AMD for something. I doubt a bunch of them just wanted to say hey we got AM3+ support for no reason. Even not a lawsuit but it doesn't help things for AMD. But I guess when you have to wait like 5 years for a new processor to come out people are going to be looking for a new mobo anyways.
i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.
the AM3+ support boards they show actually have the AM3+ socket and follow am3+ specifications; only the chipset is taken over from AM3 (considering both use the same hypertransport protocol there should be no problems at all just like some AGP chipsets from 2003 were used on AM2 boards)
Core i7 2600k|HD 6950|8GB RipJawsX|2x 128gb Samsung SSD 830 Raid0|Asus Sabertooth P67
Seasonic X-560|Corsair 650D|2x WD Red 3TB Raid1|WD Green 3TB|Asus Xonar Essence STX
Core i3 2100|HD 7770|8GB RipJawsX|128gb Samsung SSD 830|Asrock Z77 Pro4-M
Bequiet! E9 400W|Fractal Design Arc Mini|3x Hitachi 7k1000.C|Asus Xonar DX
Dell Latitude E6410|Core i7 620m|8gb DDR3|WXGA+ Screen|Nvidia Quadro NVS3100
256gb Samsung PB22-J|Intel Wireless 6300|Sierra Aircard MC8781|WD Scorpio Blue 1TB
Harman Kardon HK1200|Vienna Acoustics Brandnew|AKG K240 Monitor 600ohm|Sony CDP 228ESD
Actually -- it was the 939A785GMH/128M. I'm still P-O'ed it never made it to the USA.
Combining the IGP HD 4200 graphics/128MB sideport with s939/DDR was full of win.
The information I'm hearing is the voltage regulator is whats different on the AM3+ motherboard. The BD needs a different voltage regulator that can change the voltage on the fly per core and not all cores at the same time like the AM3 motherboard does.
I read on Fud there was some chipset issues AMD is working on before Bulldozer Launch. I bet the 900 Series chipsets were supposed to be announced at CeBit and these are what we are getting as a result. Something new to make money between now and Bulldozer.
Main: 900D - Prime 1000T - Asus Crosshair VI Extreme - R7 1700X @ 4.0ghz - RX Vega 64? - 32GB DDR4 3466 - 1TB 960 Pro -
--- XSPC AX360 x3 - HK IV Pro - HK RX480 - HK 200 D5 - BP Compression ---
HTPC: 250D - Prime 850T - Gigabyte G1 ITX - i7 6700K @ 4.5ghz - GTX 1080 Ti - 16GB 3200 - 1TB 960 Pro -
--- ST30 x UT60 - Kyros HF - KryoGraphics 1080 - HK100 DDC - Monsoon Compression ---
HV01: Define XL R2 - Prime 1200P - Asus Zenith Extreme - TR 1950X - RX580CF - 128GB DDR4 ECC - 512GB 960P - 4x 2TB RE
HV02: Node 804 - Prime 850T - SuperMicro X1SSH - E3-1230 v6 - Vega FE - 64GB ECC - 512GB 960 Pro - 4x 6TB Gold -
Bookmarks