Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: 4R0 C300 on LSI 9260

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    60

    4R0 C300 on LSI 9260

    Added one more disk for a total of four. Read ahead vs no read ahead.

    Mitch
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4R0_read_ahead.jpg 
Views:	392 
Size:	119.5 KB 
ID:	111640   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2R0_no_read_ahead_edited-1.jpg 
Views:	392 
Size:	120.1 KB 
ID:	111641  

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Haverford, PA
    Posts
    272
    Now I really, REALLY wish I had a second PCI-E slot.

    Nice numbers
    ~FoxDie~
    CM HAF 932
    MSI Z68A-GD65
    2600k Watercooled @ 4.6 GHz
    Powercolor HD6950
    4x4GB G.skill Ripjaws X 2133
    2x Crucial M4 128GB R0
    WD 1TB Black

  3. #3
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Which stripe size you using, is that with Fastpath ?? Nice 4k numbers too!!

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Corner Brook, Newfoundland
    Posts
    145
    for comparison guys, here are 4 C300 128 gb versions on the UD7 P67, 128 stripe


  5. #5
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Thanks doorules, mitchb your writes are way off.. Your scores should be alot better using a 9260 over the p67 controller.. Anyone add to this ?

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    37
    optimal LSI SSD RAID settings:
    WT&NRA&DIO, 64KB

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Kirghudu, Cowjackingstan
    Posts
    462
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny87au View Post
    Thanks doorules, mitchb your writes are way off.. Your scores should be alot better using a 9260 over the p67 controller.. Anyone add to this ?
    You are absolutely correct. But for that he needs a FastPath key. 4K Read/Write performance is gimped on 9260 without FastPath.

    Sony KDL40 // ASRock P67 Extreme4 1.40 // Core i5 2500K //
    G.Skill Ripjaws 1600 4x2Gb // HD6950 2GB // Intel Gigabit CT PCIe //
    M-Audio Delta 2496 // Crucial-M4 128Gb // Hitachi 2TB // TRUE-120 //
    Antec Quattro 850W // Antec 1200 // Win7 64 bit

  8. #8
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by F@32 View Post
    You are absolutely correct. But for that he needs a FastPath key. 4K Read/Write performance is gimped on 9260 without FastPath.
    Is that the only thing FP improves on the LSI controllers ? I thought that and latency helps with fp key ?

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  9. #9
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    yes latency is tremendously better with FP. that is the only way to boost the low QD random, lower latency! they go hand in hand
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  10. #10
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    cheers buddy!

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    60
    The benches were using an MSI big bang, 980X @ 4.3 GHz and fastpath. 64K stripe. Direct I/O & writethrough. The 4K writes were much better using ich10r with WBC enabled but, max throughput was limited to ~600 Mb/s. Overall, still a fast system.

    Mitch

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •