Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: AMTECH Review - ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Posts
    128

    AMTECH Review - ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP

    Box of ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP


    The back of the box


    Accessories


    Looking directly ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP


    ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP look from behind


    IO ports of the ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP


    ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP need two 6-pin power supply


    Default clock of ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP is 900/1050, with a cooling system DirectCU II, I can overclock maximum core/mem to 1060/1150 and run 3DMark 11 Performance.


    ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II's fan is very quiet even adjust the fan speed to 100%.

    Source : http://forum.amtech.com.vn/overclock...tml#post769465

    More review is coming soon

  2. #2
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,439
    Cant wait for full review, Sound testing will be worth while.. Seems to push past 1050+ easily, Really cant wait to see how far these can go on air..

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    24
    Why only one sli connector :/
    I would like to see performance in 3 sli

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Posts
    128
    The First Review ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP @ 820/1000 Vs ASUS Radeon HD 5870 Matrix @ 850/1200

    CPU Core i7 980X @ 3.6GHz, RAM 6GB. Driver AMD 11.1a hotfix and NVIDIA 266.44 beta.

    3DMark Vantage




    Crysis Warhead AA=4X Enthusiast DX10 1680*1050




    Call of Juarez AA=4X Super-sampling, DX10 1680*1050




    Devil May Cry 4 AA=4X Super High, DX10 1680*1050




    3DMark 11 Performance




    ...to be continued

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Posts
    128
    Resident Evil 5. AA=4X, All High DX10, 1680*1050




    Dirt 2, AA=4X, Ultra DX11, 1680*1050, Post Process=High




    HAWX 2, AA=4X, DX11, 1680*1050, Max Settings




    ...to be continued

  6. #6
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,439
    hi bakalu could u run both cards at 950 for a better comparison? Quite sure both could handle 950 rather easily..

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Posts
    128
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny87au View Post
    hi bakalu could u run both cards at 950 for a better comparison? Quite sure both could handle 950 rather easily..
    I will review ASUS GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP @ 1020/1075 Vs ASUS Radeon HD 6970.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,439
    thanks

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  9. #9
    The_MAN_eta
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by bakalu View Post
    I will review ASUS GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP @ 1020/1075 Vs ASUS Radeon HD 6970.
    Waiting for it ^^

    Ty for the results.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Posts
    128
    ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP @ 1020/1075, Room temp 30oC, fan 100%, run furmark in 20 minutes


    Maximum temp 87oC (Vcore=1.112V)

    But, card was not running stable at core/mem 1020/1075 , I must decrease core/mem 1015/1075 and increasing vCore = 1.137V and ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP run stable 100% at core/mem 1015/1075

    I play Crysis Warhead in over 45 minutes (play Map Train and Map Airfield), room temp 30oC, fan 100%


    Maximum temp when playing game 81oC.

    Some pictures when playing Crysis Warhead at core/mem 1015/1075




    More review is coming .....

    Source : http://forum.amtech.com.vn/overclock...tml#post770158

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Posts
    128
    Quote Originally Posted by maneta View Post
    Waiting for it ^^

    Ty for the results.
    Review ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP @ 1015/1075 Vs ASUS Radeon HD 6970

    My system
    CPU Core i7 Extreme 980X @ 3.6GHz
    Mainboard ASUS Rampage II Gene
    RAM 3x2GB DDR3
    ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP 900/1800/1050 @ 1015/2030/1075
    ASUS Radeon HD 6970 @
    890/1375
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit RTM
    Driver NVIDIA 266.44 beta
    Driver AMD 11.1a hotfix
    PhysX_9.10.0514_SystemSoftware

    3DMark Vantage Performance

    ASUS Radeon HD 6970 @ 890/1375


    ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP 900/1800/1050 @ 1015/2030/1075


    Benchmark DX11 H.A.W.X.2.

    Settings of H.A.W.X.2


    Benchmark at 1680*1050

    ASUS Radeon HD 6970 @
    890/1375


    ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP 900/1800/1050 @ 1015/2030/1075


    Demo benchmark Dirt 2 DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Ultra Settings. POST PROCESS=HIGH

    ASUS Radeon HD 6970 @ 890/1375


    ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP 900/1800/1050 @ 1015/2030/1075


    Benchmark game DX11 Lost Planet 2.

    Settings of
    Lost Planet 2


    Benchmark at 1680*1050

    Test A Results


    ASUS Radeon HD 6970 @ 890/1375


    ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP 900/1800/1050 @ 1015/2030/1075


    Test B Results

    ASUS Radeon HD 6970 @ 890/1375


    ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP 900/1800/1050 @ 1015/2030/1075


    Heaven V2.1 Demo benchmark DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=Extreme, Max Settings

    ASUS Radeon HD 6970 @
    890/1375


    ASUS GeForce GTX 560 Ti DirectCU II TOP 900/1800/1050 @ 1015/2030/1075


    Benchmark results of other games, you can see: http://forum.amtech.com.vn/overclock...tml#post770448

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Serbia-Belgrade
    Posts
    585

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2
    Asus motherboard performance was quite good.


    ______________

    baby car seats
    baby stroller
    baby walker

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    US, MI
    Posts
    1,679
    Can you test mafia 2's benchmark with a 1080p res or higher, maxed details with maxed physx?
    (edit I see you're running a lower res..., ohwell it wuld be fine to check in that res instead...)

    I'm interested in knowing if the extra amount of shaders compared to the gtx460's and the se models(has even less shaders) helps with physx.
    Maybe it's finally enough shaders on a mid range card, or maybe not.

    I think it's nice they were able to increase the shader count and keep the wattage ruffly the same.

    Really they've had card's out for ages with 384 shaders, I think it's due time they focus on getting the power down for that.
    120w would suffice for mid range...
    Last edited by NEOAethyr; 02-22-2011 at 09:22 AM.


    CPU: Intel Core i7-4930k [3332B054]
    CPU Heatsink: NZXT Kraken X60
    Mobo: ASUS Rampage IV Black Edition (0507 BIOS)
    MEM: 4x 4gig G.Skill [F3-2400C9Q-16GTXD] (Dual Sidded Samsung of Some Sorts)
    PSU: Antec HCP-850 Platinum
    VGA: nVidia Grid VGX K2 (WIP with 2x 680 lightnings)
    Monitor: ASUS VG278HE & 3DVision2 Kit
    Drives: 2x WD Red 2TB Drives [WDBMMA0020HNC-NRSN] (RAID 0), Corsair Force Series 3 CSSD-F60GB3A-BK 60GB SATA3 SSD, Pioneer BDR-2208 Blue Ray Burner
    Case: Rosewill Blackhawk Ultra
    OS's: Windows 2003 Enterprise x86 SP2-R2 VLM, Windows 7 Standard Embedded x86 SP1 EVL (128GB Patched), Windows 7 Standard Embedded x64 SP1 EVL
    Mouse: Using generic mouse for now...
    Arm:Samsung Galaxy S IV i9500 Octo-Core Quad Band 16gb Unlocked and 2x 64gig sd cards
    777

    Sig is slightly out of date, I'll update it later ^^


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •