Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 51

Thread: 3DMark Vantage P75k

  1. #26
    Wpprriimmee crrraaazzzyyy
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    1,804
    Quote Originally Posted by ME4ME View Post
    Hi Duck,

    I was just about to compare your and Kingpin's result with the SR-2 and noticed some strange things..

    While you're running 100mhz more on the GPU's, your still behind in GT1 and GT2 (even though Vince's memory speed may have helped, it shouldn't make that much of a difference).

    Also, your CPU-test 1 is extremly high, about 30% higher than Vince's score (which was done with higher clocks) .. while CPU-test 2 is slightly lower, but on a normal level.

    I hope either you or Vince can explain some more about this.. It may just be the SR-2 "weirdness" that I personally haven't experienced .. but the result sure does look a bit weird.

    No hard feelings
    CPU score is weird.
    Could it by Physics plus throttling?

    3 PSUs and so many pots...
    Heatware



    Custom SS unit by Gray Mole, Sdumper Cascade, K|ngp|n F1 Gemnni, TEK9 Fatboy, TEK9 Slim, NB-1, H2O stuff...
    Celeron 347, Celeron 356, Celeron 420, 2x P4 631, P4 670, P4 640, P4 651, P4 524, PD 915, P4 540J, 2x P4 530J, P4 520J Crucial Ballistix 2x1GB DDR2-8500 2x Asus REX X48, Gigabyte EP45-UD3P rev 1.0, Asus Commando P965,
    Stuff I used to have:
    Asus RIIIE X58, Evga Classified P55, Gigabyte EP45T-UD3LR, i5 670, E8600, Q9650, Q9550, , 3x2GB Mushkin Redline 2000C8,, G.Skill 2x2GB PC9600(Silver), Evga Evbot
    XFX 4770 modded, XFX 7950GT, XFX 6600GT, Evga 8600GTS 512MB, 3850 OC, 4x 3870s, and X600

    "In this world, Elwood, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant." - James Stewart

  2. #27
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,233
    Gratzy ! ! !
    BTTB - Gigabyte Z87X-OC - WCed I7 4770k - 2x8gb Ballistix 1600mhz - Zotac GTX 780
    Asus Xonar Pheobus - OS -> Toshiba Q 256gb - Games -> 2x Agility 4 256gb Raid0
    Corsair HX850 - Tecnofront HWD BenchTable - Asus VE278Q 5760x1080

    Serveur - Asus Z77m PRO - 2500K - NH-C12P - 4x4gb G.Skill Ares 1600mhz
    Agility 4 128gb - Corsair CX430M - 1TB Black - 2TB green - 2TB Red

    KatPat - Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 - FX-8320 - PH-TC14CS - 2x4gb Viper 1600mhz - GTS 450
    Samsung Evo 120gb - Corsair HX750 - Bitfenix Survivor White - Asus VE247H

  3. #28
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    247
    Crazy clocks and scores as always Duck-san

  4. #29
    Champion
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Warsaw, Poland
    Posts
    476
    Awesome work
    MSI MOA 2009 POLAND #3
    Gigabyte GOOC 2010 POLAND #2
    MSI MOA 2010 POLAND - NOT ORGANISED
    ASUS Polish Overclocking Championship 2010 #1
    MSI MOA 2011 POLAND - NOT INVITED
    HWBOT Country Cup 2011 - POLAND! #1
    MSI MOA 2012 EMEA - #1
    MSI MOA 2012 WW FINALS - #7
    ASUS Open Overclocking Cup AOOC 2012 - #1
    HWBOT Country Cup 2012 - POLAND! #2
    MSI MOA 2013 EMEA Qualifier - #2
    ASUS Open Overclocking Cup AOOC 2013 - #?
    MSI MOA 2013 WW FINALS - #?

  5. #30
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by aslanwas View Post
    ..................... holy , that's WR, yeah ?
    Well i believe so, his old WR was done on the same rig with a SR-2, but this score without physx is insane lol

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  6. #31
    PIfection
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    989
    firstly congrats to you duck-san, nice result, it is great to see you and fellow team japan members benching 3D, we were always hoping you would start benching 3d!

    secondly ME4ME, gt are down because in 4-way GT are basically a CPU test and iirc Vince has almost 150-200 MHz on Duck on the CPU, this would equate to a high boost in GT1 and big in GT2 also.. you simply can't make use of that massive GPU power without the CPU clocks to match... i bet 1050-1075 MHz on the GPU would yield a similar result..

  7. #32
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,586
    kingpin has a back up?


  8. #33
    Champion
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    550
    Holly cow, you're getting crazy, Duck San, so is Galaxy !
    Nice 580 & excellent work

    Send me a sample of this magnifier, would you !
    I need that for a 4x 580 WR
    A qualified amateur has been poisoned by LN2 & soon be killed

  9. #34
    -_-
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    ATLanta, Ga.
    Posts
    516
    Congrats on showing the sr-2 who is boss
    Quote Originally Posted by youngpro View Post
    you simply can't make use of that massive GPU power without the CPU clocks to match... i bet 1050-1075 MHz on the GPU would yield a similar result..
    GT1 loves strong CPU clocks for sure
    Quote Originally Posted by Gautam View Post
    I'll add my name to this elpida graveyard as soon I even think about running 32M. (yes, the thought is enough)



  10. #35
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    YOKOHAMA
    Posts
    163
    Dear James, Mad, and Dinos

    Thank you!

    Brian, Oliver, George, Oj101, miahallen, over@locker886, Maj0r, GHZ ,scooter,Boulard,
    DomagojX,Hondacity,slamms,ExpatGriz,1Day,Johnny87・ ・・・

    Thank you all for your comment.


    Quote Originally Posted by ME4ME View Post
    Hi Duck,

    I was just about to compare your and Kingpin's result with the SR-2 and noticed some strange things..

    While you're running 100mhz more on the GPU's, your still behind in GT1 and GT2 (even though Vince's memory speed may have helped, it shouldn't make that much of a difference).

    Also, your CPU-test 1 is extremly high, about 30% higher than Vince's score (which was done with higher clocks) .. while CPU-test 2 is slightly lower, but on a normal level.

    I hope either you or Vince can explain some more about this.. It may just be the SR-2 "weirdness" that I personally haven't experienced .. but the result sure does look a bit weird.

    No hard feelings

    Hi ME4ME-san

    CPU score looks strange as you pointed it out.
    But I of course turned off PhysX and didn't do anything "special."

    Sometimes my SR-2 system boosts up when I run Vantage repeatedly under the
    same clock(both CPU and VGA).
    In the past I saw CPU score exceeded 100K on my system with PhysX turned
    off.

    This time, when GPU clock reached somewhere around 1150MHz, CPU score
    started to boost up, yet GPU score didn't go up.

    I still don't know why this happened, it is a mystery.
    I talked to the EVGA people about this before, but no clear answer.


    My SR-2 system can run Vantage with CPU at Over5.4GHz, VGA clock 1200MHz x 4.
    But this time, somehow score didn't go as high as I thought it would.

    This score is just a beginning.
    I am planning to give it another shot in the near future.


    >No hard feelings

    I don't mind it at all

  11. #36
    Wpprriimmee crrraaazzzyyy
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    1,804
    Quote Originally Posted by duck View Post
    Hi ME4ME-san

    CPU score looks strange as you pointed it out.
    But I of course turned off PhysX and didn't do anything "special."

    Sometimes my SR-2 system boosts up when I run Vantage repeatedly under the
    same clock(both CPU and VGA).
    In the past I saw CPU score exceeded 100K on my system with PhysX turned
    off.

    This time, when GPU clock reached somewhere around 1150MHz, CPU score
    started to boost up, yet GPU score didn't go up.

    I still don't know why this happened, it is a mystery.
    I talked to the EVGA people about this before, but no clear answer.


    My SR-2 system can run Vantage with CPU at Over5.4GHz, VGA clock 1200MHz x 4.
    But this time, somehow score didn't go as high as I thought it would.

    This score is just a beginning.
    I am planning to give it another shot in the near future.


    >No hard feelings

    I don't mind it at all
    Very nice.
    I know it must be hard work to tame that whole system with LN2.
    Great work Duck.
    Heatware



    Custom SS unit by Gray Mole, Sdumper Cascade, K|ngp|n F1 Gemnni, TEK9 Fatboy, TEK9 Slim, NB-1, H2O stuff...
    Celeron 347, Celeron 356, Celeron 420, 2x P4 631, P4 670, P4 640, P4 651, P4 524, PD 915, P4 540J, 2x P4 530J, P4 520J Crucial Ballistix 2x1GB DDR2-8500 2x Asus REX X48, Gigabyte EP45-UD3P rev 1.0, Asus Commando P965,
    Stuff I used to have:
    Asus RIIIE X58, Evga Classified P55, Gigabyte EP45T-UD3LR, i5 670, E8600, Q9650, Q9550, , 3x2GB Mushkin Redline 2000C8,, G.Skill 2x2GB PC9600(Silver), Evga Evbot
    XFX 4770 modded, XFX 7950GT, XFX 6600GT, Evga 8600GTS 512MB, 3850 OC, 4x 3870s, and X600

    "In this world, Elwood, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant." - James Stewart

  12. #37
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    251
    Quote Originally Posted by duck View Post
    Dear James, Mad, and Dinos

    Thank you!

    Brian, Oliver, George, Oj101, miahallen, over@locker886, Maj0r, GHZ ,scooter,Boulard,
    DomagojX,Hondacity,slamms,ExpatGriz,1Day,Johnny87・ ・・・

    Thank you all for your comment.





    Hi ME4ME-san

    CPU score looks strange as you pointed it out.
    But I of course turned off PhysX and didn't do anything "special."

    Sometimes my SR-2 system boosts up when I run Vantage repeatedly under the
    same clock(both CPU and VGA).
    In the past I saw CPU score exceeded 100K on my system with PhysX turned
    off.

    This time, when GPU clock reached somewhere around 1150MHz, CPU score
    started to boost up, yet GPU score didn't go up.

    I still don't know why this happened, it is a mystery.
    I talked to the EVGA people about this before, but no clear answer.


    My SR-2 system can run Vantage with CPU at Over5.4GHz, VGA clock 1200MHz x 4.
    But this time, somehow score didn't go as high as I thought it would.

    This score is just a beginning.
    I am planning to give it another shot in the near future.


    >No hard feelings

    I don't mind it at all
    Hi Duck i have seen this issue happen before even tho you have disabled phys-x it is still running unless you disable all cuda processing aswell, I had this issue recently benching.

    Keep up the good work tho champ.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    "realy magic isnt card tricks, big cribs and cars b1tch
    its 6 gig vantage full pass without 2v sh1t" Young Pro

  13. #38
    The_MAN_eta
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    61
    Those gpu clocks... are CRAZY!

    Same as the resulsts.

    Big Gz really. I didnt knew those galaxy were able to reach such clicks.

  14. #39
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,609
    Congrats Duck-San really nice SR2 action, not easy bench with that platform
    Quote Originally Posted by LardArse View Post
    i think you are asking the wrong person about safety limits, but

  15. #40
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,634
    5690s = 100K CPU anyone?
    Signatures make my posts look huge... but I'm not humble enough to completely remove my signature, so I kept this note explaining it.

  16. #41
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    198
    Congratz Duck-san Beast of a set-up, man.

    GPU settings (clocks/voltage) can positively effect the CPU portion of the score, even with physx-off. Also, conversely sometimes you can surprisingly get through GT1 & 2 with real high GPU clock, to only have CPU tests die on you...drop the GPU clocks, then CPU tests finish. There seems to be an efficiency setting that the GPU/CPU work well with together...the trick of course is finding that setting, lol. That's my experience anyway. And Evga don't know jack about the intricacies of any benchmark application. They sell product...ask K|np|n, he's the one with the answers.
    Mobo: eVGA x58 Classified (759)
    CPU: i7-990x
    GPU: 2xGTX 580
    Cooling: F1 Gemini/Tek-9 Fat LN2 | 12k BTU Chiller HK 3.0/DD Water Block
    RAM: 3 x 2gb DDR3 Crucial Ballistix Tracers
    HD: OCZ LE SSD 100GB | OCZ Vertex 2 SSD 60GB
    PSU: PC Power & Cooling 1200W
    OS: Win7 64-Bit | XP Pro
    Monitor: Dell 2707 LCD

  17. #42
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    671
    Great achieivement, 4-way is so hard to bench especially alone Overclocking doesn't get much more badass than this.
    2008 - AOCC WW #2 | MOA EU #8 | GOOC WW #1
    2009 - GOOC WW #3 | MOA EU #3 | MOA WW #1 | GB TweaKing #6 | ASUS ROG OCS #2
    2010 - MOA EU #1 | GOOC EU #13 | MOA WW #1
    2011 - MOA EU #4 | MOA WW #?

  18. #43
    Xtreme XIP
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,559

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by ME4ME View Post
    Hi Duck,

    I was just about to compare your and Kingpin's result with the SR-2 and noticed some strange things..

    While you're running 100mhz more on the GPU's, your still behind in GT1 and GT2 (even though Vince's memory speed may have helped, it shouldn't make that much of a difference).

    Also, your CPU-test 1 is extremly high, about 30% higher than Vince's score (which was done with higher clocks) .. while CPU-test 2 is slightly lower, but on a normal level.

    I hope either you or Vince can explain some more about this.. It may just be the SR-2 "weirdness" that I personally haven't experienced .. but the result sure does look a bit weird.

    No hard feelings
    yes , you are correct 100% , thats a bugged run on SR-2 , CPU bugged.

  19. #44
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    198
    Quote Originally Posted by chispy View Post
    yes , you are correct 100% , thats a bugged run on SR-2 , CPU bugged.
    CPU 1 bugged on high GPU clocks maybe?
    Mobo: eVGA x58 Classified (759)
    CPU: i7-990x
    GPU: 2xGTX 580
    Cooling: F1 Gemini/Tek-9 Fat LN2 | 12k BTU Chiller HK 3.0/DD Water Block
    RAM: 3 x 2gb DDR3 Crucial Ballistix Tracers
    HD: OCZ LE SSD 100GB | OCZ Vertex 2 SSD 60GB
    PSU: PC Power & Cooling 1200W
    OS: Win7 64-Bit | XP Pro
    Monitor: Dell 2707 LCD

  20. #45
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    Quote Originally Posted by duck View Post
    Sometimes my SR-2 system boosts up when I run Vantage repeatedly under the
    same clock(both CPU and VGA).
    In the past I saw CPU score exceeded 100K on my system with PhysX turned
    off.

    This time, when GPU clock reached somewhere around 1150MHz, CPU score
    started to boost up, yet GPU score didn't go up.

    I still don't know why this happened, it is a mystery.
    I talked to the EVGA people about this before, but no clear answer.
    Considering the circumstances, I apologize, but I cannot view this score as legitimate. It appears that the setup does not consistently produce scores like this, and there is no explanation for why it produced this one.

  21. #46
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    2,219
    Wow, truly amazing. I <3 when I see a thread started by duck. Congrats!!!
    MB Reviewer for HWC
    Team OCX Bench Team

  22. #47
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    246
    Amazing

  23. #48
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    YOKOHAMA
    Posts
    163
    Thanks all.

    I was very confident of this record from the beginning and posted it on the
    web..

    CPU clock seemed a bit low, however GPU clock is at 1170MHz and I thought it
    was a possible score.
    I felt a bit strange about the CPU-Test1 figure, but I can make the same
    score again and again anytime.
    I have posted the score under the same status before on the web, and nobody
    ever suspected or pointed it out back then.


    However, I discussed with the people engaged in SR-2 designing whom I trust,
    and I found I was wrong about it.
    It turned out to be a possible bug, and it was a impossible score under the
    system environment.

    Therefore this score should not be recognized as the record and I believe
    the record must be recognized by a third party.

    But I will not give up and will try again soon.



    By the way, this is the second best score I set during the try.

    Last edited by duck; 01-30-2011 at 08:45 PM.

  24. #49
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    413
    Wow duck... I like that score better! It makes sense lol!

    Awesome benching. Bugged runs are no fun


    i7 920 / X58A-OC / Dominator GT 2000 7-8-7 / 5870 Lightning

  25. #50
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by Linuxfan View Post
    CPU score is weird.
    Could it by Physics plus throttling?

    3 PSUs and so many pots...
    Actually physx affects the second CPU test, but not the first.
    So if physx was enabled, his second CPU test would be off the chard.

    Cpu test 1 seems right tho. Most likely his uncore is a bit higher, which greatly affects the CPU-1 score.


    Also, were the GPUs hard-volt modded, or just an unlocked bios?
    CPU: 3960X @ 4.8GHZ
    Motherboard: RIVE
    Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws Z 2133@LC9
    GPUs: Quad-SLI 580 @ 970
    Case: MM Ascension CYO
    PSUs: Corsair AX1200, Enermax 1250

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •