Granted, but if AMD truly has something spectacular, it'd be a smart move to start showing off some performance numbers given the proximity to the release date. The amount of excitement seems to have really died down. That's not to say I'm neither excited or optimistic about it, just the silence does not look good. Intel moving SB-E to a 2012 launch date I think is the only thing helping right now, which if they are bluffing and release it when originally planned... Well, I'm just thankful the chances of that are slim.
BD top chip at launch is going to be 10% slower on average than Intel's 2600K. I've said it and I stand by it. There has not been enough IPC improvements to overcome Intel's SB. It will do fantastic in
multi thread programs, but not so good in programs that utilize one or two threads.
Last edited by freeloader; 08-24-2011 at 05:40 PM.
As quoted by LowRun......"So, we are one week past AMD's worst case scenario for BD's availability but they don't feel like communicating about the delay, I suppose AMD must be removed from the reliable sources list for AMD's products launch dates"
Last edited by freeloader; 08-25-2011 at 09:58 AM.
As quoted by LowRun......"So, we are one week past AMD's worst case scenario for BD's availability but they don't feel like communicating about the delay, I suppose AMD must be removed from the reliable sources list for AMD's products launch dates"
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
How about you quit acting like you know everything and acting a fanboy. Wait until the damn product is released before coming to conclusions please.
Nobody went around talking about Conroe like you do Zambezi so I suggest giving it a rest, no? You might be suprised that AMD has a competitive chip, or maybe you are just afraid of AMD being competition.
Smile
1100T @ 4ghz scores the same as a 2600k stock in pcmark i think it is. we all know 2600k is 3.8 turbo at stock so how bad is 1100T again? BD is gona smoke them all. i use to think 6 months ago that BD would land between 2600k and 990x but i think different now.
all things being equal for even 1100T and 2600k gpu ram ect..... in games there is what maybe a 10fps difference... still dont see how that is getting smoked,killed, omg loook at that intel go.
heres a really good one >>> but i have a i7 .... ok. then they show you cpuz @ 4.5 and you see there cheapo ram (not that ram makes much diff on a 2nd gen i7) and some 5350 or a 450 or lower gpu and they think that there system is pWn or someother term they have learned.
ok done with my rant and letting out my AMD koolaid. LMAO
As quoted by LowRun......"So, we are one week past AMD's worst case scenario for BD's availability but they don't feel like communicating about the delay, I suppose AMD must be removed from the reliable sources list for AMD's products launch dates"
Seasonic Prime TX-850 Platinum | MSI X570 MEG Unify | Ryzen 5 5800X 2048SUS, TechN AM4 1/2" ID
32GB Viper Steel 4400, EK Monarch @3733/1866, 1.64v - 13-14-14-14-28-42-224-16-1T-56-0-0
WD SN850 1TB | Zotac Twin Edge 3070 @2055/1905, Alphacool Eisblock
2 x Aquacomputer D5 | Eisbecher Helix 250
EK-CoolStream XE 360 | Thermochill PA120.3 | 6 x Arctic P12
tell us what we don't know about BD
AMD reveals new details on upcoming Bulldozer chips
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/computers/...e_skin;content
lol probably less than that, it's the GPU that makes the difference. my P2 x6 runs every game I throw at it smoothly, even at stock 3.2ghz.
I rarely convert audio or compress files, or do anything very CPU intensive I mostly game, so if you gave me both systems with the same GPU I probably wouldn't even notice the difference.
DJ Falcone 2x Technics SL1200 MK5, Behringer DJX750 Mixer, Alienware m17 laptop.
Personally, I prefer not to put all my eggs in one basket. Makes for less of a mess later on.BD top chip at launch is going to be 10% slower on average than Intel's 2600K. I've said it and I stand by it.
What kind of logic is that?
-10% on average it cannot win any multithreaded application!
Because if it would win by 20% in multithreaded you won't reach 10% slower on average.
So you probably mean -10% on low threaded applications? Well guess what, AMD has 10-20% clockspeed advantage on anything using 2-4 threads. (which is the majority of the desktop applications). Even phenom2 with l3 at 2.6GHz would be competitive in those applications with that clockspeed advantage. So i see no reason why FX8 8150 wouldn't be competitive in those applications. It will be a different matter for the FX4 and FX6 which do not have such a clockspeed advantage between 2-4 threads. FX4 (~2%) (FX6 has 2-10% for 2-4threads)
Last edited by flyck; 08-25-2011 at 12:05 AM.
I'm not worried about BD performance at launch at all. It will competetive in performance and price. But the high clock design could mean that AMD is hitting a performance ceiling pretty soon. How much further can they take the stock speeds? 5Ghz turbo? At one point they will have to start adding power through extra cache or improvements of the core itself. We know that a 2nd and 3rd generation BD are being prepared but it will be interesting to see what road they are going to take there. What we don't want is 4-5 years of AMD on the same arch with not much room for growth.
Let's see:
2600K on average gets 213.4pts. 1100T gets 165.8pts. 10% slower than 2600K for 3.6Ghz Zambezi would mean 213.4/1.1=194pts. This in turn is around 16% faster than 3.3Ghz X6 Thuban according to the chart. Note that Zambezi has 9% clock advantage.
So basically you expect that Bulldozer design,which is a:
-whole new uarchitecture,with many bottlenecks from K8/K10 removed and better utilization of execution units,new redesigned int and fp pipelines,
-33% more cores,
-13% higher Turbo core clock : 4.2Ghz vs 3.7Ghz (which now runs across 4 cores and not only 3),
-higher default clock of 9% (3.6Ghz vs 3.3Ghz),
-somewhat higher IPC in integer/fp(as per AMD)
-better power management
to run slower than Thuban 1100T. Do you see the problem in your logic? Zambezi will not be only 16% faster than Thuban. Turbo core ALONE will get you there,disregarding the effect of 33% more cores or improvements in the cores.
Last edited by repman; 08-25-2011 at 03:36 AM.
________________
Main:
Phenom II x6 1090T BE|Crosshair IV Formula|Corsair 4x2GB DDR3|Sapphire HD5870|Adaptec 2405 + Hitachi Ultrastar 15k 450GB SAS, Toshiba MBD2147RC 146GB 10k SAS, Samsung F3 1TB, Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB 5900RPM, WD Black 2TB, Seagate Barracuda ST2000M001 2TB|Asus Xonar Essence ST + HD600|Corsair HX850|HPZR24w|Fractal Define XL Black|Windows 7 X64 Pro
Backup/Storage server:
HP Proliant ML350 G4|2 x Xeon "Nocona" 3GHz|4GB DDR1 ECC|Storage (SCSI): 3x10k 72GB + 10k 300GB + 15k 300GB + Ultrium460 tape drive|Storage (SATA): Adaptec 2810SA + 2 x WD Caviar 250GB RAID0 + Seagate 250GB|Windows Server 2008r2 Datacenter
Other:
HP Proliant DL380 G5|Xeon 5150|4GB FB DDR2 ECC|HP Smart Array P400-256MB cache|3x10k 146GB SAS in RAID 0 + 10k 146GB SAS|2x800W|ATi FireGL V7700|Samsung 226BW|Windows Server 2008r2 Enterprise
HP DL320 G5|Xeon 3150 2.13GHz|1GB DDR2 ECC|2x80GB RAID 0|Windows Server 2008r2 Standard
Laptop:
HP 8560w|i5-2540M|2x4GB DDR3|AMD FirePro M5950|Samsung 840 Pro 256GB|Windows 7 X64 Pro
It's not smaller. Llano core is 9.69mm^2 without L2. BD module is 19.4mm^ without L2. If you look only at integer cores then we have 3.84mm^2 for BD integer core and 3.3mm^2 for one Llano integer "core" (or part of the core that does integer execution). Also,if we look at a BD module without the second integer core and without L2 and compare it to one K10 core on 32nm we have : 15.58mm^2 vs 9.69mm^2.In this case (mimicking the scenario of single thread execution within the module),we have all the resources that are shared being used by this single core.This means using the much faster FPU and much better prefetching and branch prediction abilities of the frontend ,all for the single thread.
This is the last of OBR
http://obrovsky.blogspot.com/2011/08...monthyear.html
What happen with this guy?
who cares?
I like large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate
I belive that posting stuff from OBR is not allowed on XS..
Intel i5 3570K w/ Noctua NH D14
Asus Sabertooth Z77
2 x 4 GB Corsair Vengeance LP 1600 Mhz
60 GB Mushkin Callisto Deluxe
500 GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.12
500 GB WD Caviar Blue
EVGA GTX 570 Superclocked
Cooler Master HAF X
Corsair HX 1000w
Logitech G510
Razer Lachesis - Steelseries QcK
Logitech G35
Logitech X230
HP L2045w
what different
B2 / C0 stepping
Intel Core i5 6600K + ASRock Z170 OC Formula + Galax HOF 4000 (8GBx2) + Antec 1200W OC Version
EK SupremeHF + BlackIce GTX360 + Swiftech 655 + XSPC ResTop
Macbook Pro 15" Late 2011 (i7 2760QM + HD 6770M)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) , Huawei Nexus 6P
[history system]80286 80386 80486 Cyrix K5 Pentium133 Pentium II Duron1G Athlon1G E2180 E3300 E5300 E7200 E8200 E8400 E8500 E8600 Q9550 QX6800 X3-720BE i7-920 i3-530 i5-750 Semp140@x2 955BE X4-B55 Q6600 i5-2500K i7-2600K X4-B60 X6-1055T FX-8120 i7-4790K
Yeah, he's pathetic, but PLEASE POSTING FROM THAT SITE!!!! I DON'T CARE ABOUT HIS BS AND NEITHER SHOULD YOU.
He's an attention whore and all you do by posting links here is helping him...
STOP MESSING UP THE TREAD.
MODS: Isn't it possible to get certain URL's replaced with smilies, just like when i write ? Can't you just put that O-word on the same list?Originally Posted by Vapor
Last edited by Mats; 08-25-2011 at 06:34 AM.
i find it interesting that he takes a quote from this thread, then we quote him quoting this thread, lol
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
Bookmarks