@BeepBeep2
Sb will lose in 3ds
\ 
but in cinebench wins
All tests have a 500MHz difference are here after OC
http://nvision.pl/Intel-Core-i7-2600...etails-17.html
Polish language - translate
@BeepBeep2
Sb will lose in 3ds
\
but in cinebench wins
All tests have a 500MHz difference are here after OC
http://nvision.pl/Intel-Core-i7-2600...etails-17.html
Polish language - translate
hicookie hits 8GHz on LN2 with AMD Bulldozer
http://gigabytedaily.blogspot.com/20....html?spref=tw
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2040266
Silverstone Sugo SG08 | Enermax Modu82+ 625W | ASRock Z77E-ITX | Intel Core i5 3570K /w Indigo Xtreme + CoolIT ECO II ALC + Noctua NF-P14 FLX | 2x4GB Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 /w Xilence Heat Pipe Duo | Sapphire HD7870 GE | Kingston HyperX T3 120GB | 2TB Samsung Spinpoint F1
??Originally Posted by wez
How nice of you to validate Flankers claim
Sadly, I doubt that was your intention, lol.
How exactly is he validating Flanker's claim ?
Beep: Thuban at 4300 MHZ (my) hit 7.72 points in R11.5, 2500k at 4.8 GHz has 7.65points, 3DMax2011 (I have here only this data): 4.05GHz 1100T 382s, 5GHz 2600k 316s (think 4c/4t 2500K at 4800MHz will be worse than 4c/8t 2600k 5GHz).
So, which shoes?
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
Those are pretty equal scores. I'm sure you can get 7.7 out of a 2500K at 4.8.Beep: Thuban at 4300 MHZ (my) hit 7.72 points in R11.5, 2500k at 4.8 GHz has 7.65points, 3DMax2011 (I have here only this data): 4.05GHz 1100T 382s, 5GHz 2600k 316s (think 4c/4t 2500K at 4800MHz will be worse than 4c/8t 2600k 5GHz).
So, which shoes?
Besides, I don't think you can write a review based purely on Cinebench 11.5.
I can't run Cinebench 11.5 at 4.3 Ghz at even unsafe voltages on water. I haven't seen a 2500K that couldn't run Cinebench above 4.8 Ghz.
Not eating a shoe just yet, 0.8% win isn't really a win in my book.
Smile
3dsmax 2011:Beep: Thuban at 4300 MHZ (my) hit 7.72 points in R11.5, 2500k at 4.8 GHz has 7.65points, 3DMax2011 (I have here only this data): 4.05GHz 1100T 382s, 5GHz 2600k 316s (think 4c/4t 2500K at 4800MHz will be worse than 4c/8t 2600k 5GHz).
So, which shoes?
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/p...k_3ds_max_2011
... but if you use 3dsmax9 ... :
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4083/t...2100-tested/17
... and btw the current version for cinema 4d is R13!
Last edited by r.p; 10-11-2011 at 04:26 AM.
Mine 2500K@5Ghz is doing 7,94 in CB 11,5.
CB likes HT so 2600K is much quicker even with lower clockspeed.
i5 2500K (L041C124) @ 5GHz + Scythe Mugen 2 rev. B | ASRock P67 Extreme4 B3 UEFI L3.19 | ADATA 2x4GB DDR3 1600 | MSI Radeon RX 470 4GB | 2x Crucial m4 64GB SSD RAID 0, Seagate 7200.12 500GB, Samsung F4 EG 2TB | 24" HP LP2475w | EVGA SuperNOVA G2 750W | Fractal Design Define R3 | Windows 10 64 bit
One thing to note is that C4D R13 makes significant changes to the renderer, as it does physical lighting now.
Whether BD renders fast in R13 is another thing, but I'm pretty sure almost everyone will be on the new version quite soonish.
Found this:
I7 4.0GHz 4 core 12 gigs ram. All times in seconds, all files loaded into the full version of c4d, all renders done 3 times.
Cinebench 10 bike scene
R11.5: 19
R12.0: 19
R13.0: 18
Cinebench 11.5 Sponza scene
R11.5: 79
R12.0: 75
R13.0: 74
i5 2500K (L041C124) @ 5GHz + Scythe Mugen 2 rev. B | ASRock P67 Extreme4 B3 UEFI L3.19 | ADATA 2x4GB DDR3 1600 | MSI Radeon RX 470 4GB | 2x Crucial m4 64GB SSD RAID 0, Seagate 7200.12 500GB, Samsung F4 EG 2TB | 24" HP LP2475w | EVGA SuperNOVA G2 750W | Fractal Design Define R3 | Windows 10 64 bit
Look, I'm not trying to be a stickler here, but it disturbs me that you're discarding accuracy for consistency of your claim. Your claim made no mention of there needing to be a wide margin or a variety of tests. Your claim, as stated, has been successfully challenged. If what you said was not what you meant, you shouldn't have said it.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Maybe Microsoft is under NDA as well...
Intel Core i5 2500k
ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen 3
16 GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 1600
Evga GeForce GTX 560 Ti 1 GB
Soundblaster X-Fi XtremeGamer
Intelbras Wi-Fi N adapter
Corsair AX850
7 days late but this post is still relevant to me. Sounds like BD's going to be an encoding monster once x264 gets updated.
I'm not sure if you have answered this yet or not, but where are you going to post up your review at?
Asus Rampage IV Extreme (Cooled by EK)
3930k (still dialing it in) (Cooled by: summer time= HeatKiller / winter time= ss phase)
Samsung 30nm 32gig (still dialing it in)
2x GTX 590 Quad-SLI (Cooled by XSPC)
128GB Crucial SSD
1200w PCP&C
@BeepBeep2
Sb will lose in 3ds
\
but in cinebench wins
All tests have a 500MHz difference are here after OC
http://nvision.pl/Intel-Core-i7-2600...etails-17.html
Polish language - translateTalking about 3dsmax9??
3dsmax.jpg
the performance of BD is here in this graph
It's the three at the top, do a better job at blurring next time.the performance of BD is here in this graph
Donate to XS forums
it's the first 3 result, it's easy to tell the difference from the leading letter, it's an F on the first 3 and a C on the other ones.
I think that the FX line will be great for gamers...
For what i've been reading and seing ... if you're not a synthetic bencher and more of a gamer... the FX will give you top performance on par with more expensive rigs
Oh...your ass is grass and I've got the weed-whacker.
the middle of the bottom 3 blurred lines looks like its 2600k stock
the chart does not give a great impression for BD, just an ok/sub-par impression
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
I don't think it is the 2600K
to me it looks like core i7-3XXXK maybe the i7-3930K model?
the three FX one look like maybe
FX-81XX stock
FX-81XX(maybe FX61XX)
FX-81XX @ 4XXX MHz?
and the core i7's look like maybe?
core i7-3930K or 3960K
core i7-3820
core i7-920/870 or 750?
but its very hard to make it out exactly
Last edited by radaja; 10-11-2011 at 08:27 AM.
_________________________________________________
............................ImAcOmPuTeRsPoNgE............................
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
MY HEATWARE 76-0-0
Well dont be too optimistic, of course instruction set could do well in some code, but for other code is another story. Wait and see.
according to the graph, 8150(415) is 8% slower than 980x(382). I could be wrong.
Last edited by undone; 10-11-2011 at 08:49 AM.
my god iron....Nda lift for italy is on 12th at 6a.m.
So in usa it would be around midnight between 11 and 12 october, don't know in which fuse, since you have 3 or 4 (east coast, central or west coast)
hwupg people drive me crazy...
all these benchmarks comparing cpus in various states of overclock = useless and confusing and harmful. we need stock vs stock. then overclocked vs overclocked. not this mixed up chit
we need all the results.
confusing?! you cant distinguish numbers?!
if you dont want to see oc results just dont watch them, I want to see them
That version of 3dsmax use more than 8 threads like 2011 and 2011?I don't think it is the 2600K
Last edited by Gilgamesh; 10-11-2011 at 10:03 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
MAXIMUS IV EXTREME-Z CPU INTEL 2600K @ 4700 Mhz @ 1,296v liquid cooling by EK supreme hf RAM A-DATA XPG+ V.2 2200 C8 elpida hyper SLI MSI GTX 560ti TWIN FROZRII OC liquid cooling by ek supreme hf vga bridge edition SSD CRUCIAL C300 128GB MONITOR SAMSUNG 2233RZ + NVIDIA 3D VISION KEYBOARD LOGITECH G110 MOUSE LOGITECH MX518
Bookmarks