Does Windows need a patch to make the AMD processors work correctly AGAIN?
If at least the power consumption is real, then we have that this particular FX doesn't face any stress in some benchs. Some pages behind there was a post mentioning how FX power consumption was extremely low despite running CB11.5.
Since this violates the NDA then the "reviewer" should have no problem measuring how many watts this FX eats in all benchs vs the SB chip.
Doesn't make sense.
Also, why include the useless superpi? Doesn't even worth any decent reviewer's time.
Last edited by Nintendork; 10-08-2011 at 09:06 PM.
Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
| Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"
Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)
Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
Reality check
Well if this is true then I am sticking with my 1090t. And thats that. This has really broken my heart.
some more leak to come
Intel Core i5 6600K + ASRock Z170 OC Formula + Galax HOF 4000 (8GBx2) + Antec 1200W OC Version
EK SupremeHF + BlackIce GTX360 + Swiftech 655 + XSPC ResTop
Macbook Pro 15" Late 2011 (i7 2760QM + HD 6770M)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) , Huawei Nexus 6P
[history system]80286 80386 80486 Cyrix K5 Pentium133 Pentium II Duron1G Athlon1G E2180 E3300 E5300 E7200 E8200 E8400 E8500 E8600 Q9550 QX6800 X3-720BE i7-920 i3-530 i5-750 Semp140@x2 955BE X4-B55 Q6600 i5-2500K i7-2600K X4-B60 X6-1055T FX-8120 i7-4790K
Rig:
Intel Core 2 Quad 9400 @4.0 GHz watercooled
AMD Radeon HD 5850 @950 MHz
4 GB Adata Vitesta
DFI LanParty X38
Creative XFi
2 WDC black 640 GB RAID 0, 2 WDC caviar 1.5 GB
Silverstone 700 w
Thermaltake Kandalf
24" Samsung LCD TV full HD
Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved
Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree
i5 2500K (L041C124) @ 5GHz + Scythe Mugen 2 rev. B | ASRock P67 Extreme4 B3 UEFI L3.19 | ADATA 2x4GB DDR3 1600 | MSI Radeon RX 470 4GB | 2x Crucial m4 64GB SSD RAID 0, Seagate 7200.12 500GB, Samsung F4 EG 2TB | 24" HP LP2475w | EVGA SuperNOVA G2 750W | Fractal Design Define R3 | Windows 10 64 bit
Why do people still believe those results are accurate for retail chips?
Still many unbelievers...
The results are true, Mosntru and Matose i think that they are the most reliable sources.
BD is what it is, a FAIL.
FX4170 will also fail to beat X4 955.
i5 2500K@ 4.5Ghz
Asrock P67 PRO3
P55 PRO & i5 750
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966385
239 BCKL validation on cold air
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966536
Almost 5hgz , air.
SweClockers.com
CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
GPU: HD 5770
SweClockers.com
CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
GPU: HD 5770
Yes the arhitecture which was wrong from the begining.And there's more than just the silicon that affects performance.
What if the penalty from sharing resources between cores is biger than AMD was saying.
Finally three more days to the complete truth.
i5 2500K@ 4.5Ghz
Asrock P67 PRO3
P55 PRO & i5 750
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966385
239 BCKL validation on cold air
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966536
Almost 5hgz , air.
SweClockers.com
CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
GPU: HD 5770
BeepBeep2
from the sitePhoronix noted a trinity 2.5 Ghz sample doing "very well" against a 2.5 deneb based laptop...
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...ty_early&num=1This Trinity APU is quad-core and running at 2.50GHz. The current quad-core Llano offerings are clocked at 2.6GHz (A6-3650) and 2.9GHz (A8-3850), while this Trinity part is clocked slower, it's numbers are nice compared to my A8-3850 Linux system.
Lower clock(16% difference) and module penalty should mean not just +10% but a rather big IPC increase.
xVeinx
I don't know how good is their benchmark testing but Llano and SB2100 are comparable and the same situation is in Windows, so I am pretty optimistic but I hope It won't end like current BD launch.That doesn't mean much. Phoronix isn't a completely bogus site by any means, but they aren't exactly "scientific" in their benchmarking either...
I think this is it,performance wise. There is no magic dust. Something is wrong with this thing since this cannot be the same design that was presented 1 year ago at HC22.That design had at least comparable performance versus the old core. This one is not only slower in ST,but sky high Turbo doesn't help it to beat the old core. Then on top of that comes poorer MT scaling and this further more lowers its performance in well multithreaded applications. And then comes the very poor SIMD performance,think Bobcat level stuff. I doubt we will hear that anything is wrong with Bulldozer and that this is the thing they were describing all along...
The funniest thing is soon AMD will release a 3Ghz QC Llano desktop chip that will maybe even have a slight Turbo for cpu cores. Imagine this 32nm 3Ghz K10 keeping up with the 4Ghz FX4110 stock vs stock in many benchmarks,it's going to be very funny to see the marketing spin on that.
Last edited by informal; 10-09-2011 at 01:13 AM.
Things that can affect CPU performance include:
* BIOS settings/features
* microcode
* CPU thread scheduler (OS), or various patches for the OS
* program compiler, and what instruction sets are used
* CPU revision/stepping
Some things are known, but some things aren't.
I think Apokalipse means more like:
Fine we know what stuff (hardware) that is used, but what about bios/uefi (agesa microcode version) & settings?
Also we know OS, but what driverversions (mostly chipset & video) are used and settings?
Did you se the PM from me requesting the "performance per watt" comparison in your upcoming review?
Would be fine if you have time to squeeze in a Win 8 dev preview test in it to
Edit: he was faster
Last edited by nex_73; 10-09-2011 at 01:18 AM.
My stuff
PhII x6 1055T @ 4.2GHz | Corsair H50 + Scythe SL12SH PnP | Asus Crosshair IV F | 4GB Dominator 1600 CL8 | Corsair HX520W | CM HAF932 | Dell 2405FPW | Creative 5.1 THX |
Bookmarks