The clock rates for the 8 core BD are not that high, in part because you can't achieve Turbo Core 2.0 levels, as posted here:
...without setting the stock speeds to a more conservative level. The above is a good representation of what the FX-8130P will be able to achieve in terms of Turbo Core.
Last edited by perkam; 05-21-2011 at 07:56 PM.
It will be that stupid unsubstantiated rumour by a guy from an English site who claims to have a Bulldozer.
He won't say anything either, funny about that.
I've been searching all day in an attempt to confirm this "rumour" and can't find a thing. I'm hardly surprised.
It originated here.
http://forums.aria.co.uk/showthread.php?t=26041&page=60
If AMD had a showstopper which is the only thing that would stop the launch now then they would be legally obliged to inform stock markets etc immediately.
It would be all over the internet like wildfire.
Last edited by Aussie FX; 05-21-2011 at 11:41 PM.
Well if there is a delay then AMD will have to come out in a few days and tell the world. But I don't buy this at all.Sure it's possible but so close to the launch(2 weeks) and AMD hits a delay is not likely to happen.
Technically whole June is still Q2 so if it launches in June,even on the last day it fits with the roadmap . Macadamia, did Anand hint in some article or in comments section?
Maybe they cannot iron out that 990 chipset bug they were talking about in one of the conference calls? As I doubt they would have CPUs in trouble.
You mean Anand the site that is not pro intel at all?
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb
http://twitter.com/#!/anandshimpi/st...66600668758016
Don't read too much into it (like the clockspeed slide omfg), just my speculation that they don't have FX chips yet, only Llano ones.
It does look like, AMD is not telling him anything, and he is just guessing as much as we are
But when you think of it, it is highly unlikely to have BD launched in two weeks, as we haven't heard anything from AMD about shipping. Unless they are doing paper launch.
better paperlaunch (for reviews) than nothing
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
I'm going to have to check my desktop computer (which is in sleep mode) to see for sure, but... I was pppretty darn certain I replied with my guesses on the ASUS slide about clock speeds >_> If I did, then for some reason it got deleted
Anyways, I came to talk about something else, but the talk on delays brings us something else I saw on the Wiki page too (yes, I take Wiki info with a grain of salt, don't worry haha).
First is all the Zambezi release dates are marked at June 20th, so that might be where the speculation is stemming from. Also after thinking about it, I guess I'm not totally sure if I ever read that AMD was releasing it on June 7th, but it may only have been said "debut". If that's the case then it could technically hit the market later on like said; not likely if you ask me.
The other part is where Wiki says, for Six and Quad cores, that they are "Native # core, with # cores disabled" My understanding was "native" meant no compromises or whatnot have been made to make something. That would make VIA's latest Nano quad core "Native", when it has two physical dies on one chip (ala Intel Quad). So wouldn't that make it NOT a native design (for all three, AMD, VIA and Intel)? Or is my understanding of what Native implies not quite correct?
OH yea, and it's listing an HT of 3200MHz. I thought that the CPU-NB was running at 2600MHz on the desktop chips? While it generally doesn't work, I'm 95% sure (it was last year) I had my Athlon II X2 250u 1.6GHz running with a higher HT then NB speed, but it's pretty much common knowledge to not run the HT above NB speed due to the almost certain fact of instability. Anyways, more inaccuracies on the Wiki article's part, or more misunderstanding on my part? lol
Link to the Wiki
Now... time to go fire up the desktop and find my post that's MIA...
EDIT: Found my post, which I had posted, but still isn't here. I hit browser back and got it all (after taking a screenshot) and before I got around to submitting it my comp crashed haha Oh well, I got the screenshot at least! Still don't know why this got deleted or what have you (glitch in the Matrix?)
Last edited by Formula350; 05-22-2011 at 07:50 AM.
Ivy Bridge 3770K @ ????MHz
6c Intel Xeon X7460 24MB cache 16GB RAM 22TB HDD fileserver
Dual Intel Xeon E5620 workstation
SB 2600K @ 5016MHz 1.37v HT on AIR primestable
AMD Athlon X3 425 @ B25 4GHz+ AIR
AMD Athlon X2 6400+ @ 3811MHz AIR
AMD Athlon X2 3600+ @ 3200MHz AIR
AMD Athlon XP 1700+ @ 2714MHz AIR
Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme
Corsair 8GB XMS3 2000MHz
ATI Radeon HD5850 @ 1000MHz+/1200MHz+
Windows 7 Enterprise x64
Corsair HX750W
Guys, may I interrupt your trash fanboy talk and ask when Interlagos is supposed to be released? (And is gonna hit retail market)
Soya
^
quite possible, with TC it still would be 3,7ghz (if it is 500mhz).
edit: played around a bit with the TC freq. and it seems the first one is a 9... but its kinda strange 900mhz would make sense (its 4,1ghz for st apps), but then theres only space for 2 numbers and there a G at the end... and the last number seems to either be a 2 or 7...
9,2 or 9,7 ghz doesn't make much sense....
Attachment 114568
Charlies & JF-AMD hinted it was a fake.
http://semiaccurate.com/forums/showt...t=4695&page=94
http://semiaccurate.com/forums/showp...&postcount=938
http://semiaccurate.com/forums/showp...&postcount=940
So.......everybody pls keep calm & wait.
Last edited by undone; 05-23-2011 at 12:33 AM.
Bookmarks