Either way, I doubt there will be any difference in OC between the two.Originally Posted by TheBreezyBB
Either way, I doubt there will be any difference in OC between the two.
Asus Crosshair IV Extreme
AMD FX-8350
AMD ref. HD 6950 2Gb x 2
4x4Gb HyperX T1
Corsair AX1200
3 x Alphacool triple, 2 x Alphacool ATXP 6970/50, EK D5 dual top, EK Supreme HF
Probably. A better power draw would be good enough.
Case: HAF-X
CPU: AMD phenom II X6 1090T@4GHz
Motherboard: Asus CHIV formula
GPU: 2x 6870
RAM: Patriot Sector 5 2x4GB
HDD: Crucial M4 256GB
Can you?On AIR
Better? --On AIR
There was no 8170 in latest roadmaps. It takes them time and resources to release a new model, even if it is the Sam as others...Phenom II X4 had a lot left in it but with PD around the corner it would be a waste of their time.
my last roadmap is one month old and as you said Beep, but maybte Il be suprise in next???
AMD FX-8350@5 GHz 1.52V + H100 Corsair, Crosshair V Formula-Z, 2x 4GB GSKill TridentX 2400 MHz+ 10-12-12-25, EAH HD6870 DirectCU, Corsair TX850W
CPUs:next 2x AMD FX-8350, AMD FX-8320, AMD FX-6300, AMD FX-4300, AMD FX-8150, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, AMD FX 8120 95W, AMD FX 8120 125W, next AMD FX-8150, AMD A10-6800K, 2x AMD A10-5800, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, 2x Intel i7-3770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge
Makes me wonder..
What are these for:
OR-B3 (0x600f13)
OR-C0 (0x600f20)
Most likely B3 will be skipped and moved to C0 directly.
AGESA_SUCCESS
C0 could be ES of Vishera (piledriver core)
AMD FX-8350@5 GHz 1.52V + H100 Corsair, Crosshair V Formula-Z, 2x 4GB GSKill TridentX 2400 MHz+ 10-12-12-25, EAH HD6870 DirectCU, Corsair TX850W
CPUs:next 2x AMD FX-8350, AMD FX-8320, AMD FX-6300, AMD FX-4300, AMD FX-8150, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, AMD FX 8120 95W, AMD FX 8120 125W, next AMD FX-8150
Nope, OR-C0 stands for "Orochi".
But what I remember, AMD always use new letter for new architecture (redesign)..
Phenom I B0-B3
Phenom II C revisions
Thuban E0 revision
Zambezi B revisions
Maybe only once in K8 era was it diferent
AMD FX-8350@5 GHz 1.52V + H100 Corsair, Crosshair V Formula-Z, 2x 4GB GSKill TridentX 2400 MHz+ 10-12-12-25, EAH HD6870 DirectCU, Corsair TX850W
CPUs:next 2x AMD FX-8350, AMD FX-8320, AMD FX-6300, AMD FX-4300, AMD FX-8150, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, AMD FX 8120 95W, AMD FX 8120 125W, next AMD FX-8150
The revision (e.g OR-B2) simply stands for the development version of the core.
First two letters are the name of the core:
KM-xx = Komodo
KR-xx = Krishna
LN-xx = Llano
OR-xx = Orochi
ON-xx = Ontario
PH-xx = Pharaoh Hound
TN-xx = Trinity
WF-xx = Weatherford
Im confused now...
ZD-xx = Zambezi ES.... But "Orochi" is die, or ...? Zambezi is core
AMD FX-8350@5 GHz 1.52V + H100 Corsair, Crosshair V Formula-Z, 2x 4GB GSKill TridentX 2400 MHz+ 10-12-12-25, EAH HD6870 DirectCU, Corsair TX850W
CPUs:next 2x AMD FX-8350, AMD FX-8320, AMD FX-6300, AMD FX-4300, AMD FX-8150, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, AMD FX 8120 95W, AMD FX 8120 125W, next AMD FX-8150
The ES were OR-A0, A1, B0, B1 and their various nodes (substeppings).
Zambezi = Platform / Segment (Desktop)
Bulldozer = µArch
Orochi = Die
AMD FX-8350@5 GHz 1.52V + H100 Corsair, Crosshair V Formula-Z, 2x 4GB GSKill TridentX 2400 MHz+ 10-12-12-25, EAH HD6870 DirectCU, Corsair TX850W
CPUs:next 2x AMD FX-8350, AMD FX-8320, AMD FX-6300, AMD FX-4300, AMD FX-8150, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, AMD FX 8120 95W, AMD FX 8120 125W, next AMD FX-8150
The Bulldozer Aftermath: Delving Even Deeper
Anandtech dig into the Bulldozer problems.
1: AMD FX-8150-Sabertooth 990FX-8GB Corsair XMS3-C300 256GB-Gainward GTX 570-HX-750
2: Phenom II X6 1100T-Asus M4A89TD Pro/usb3-8GB Corsair Dominator-Gainward GTX 460SE/-X25-V 40GB-(Crucial m4 64GB /Intel X25-M G1 80GB/X25-E 64GB/Mtron 7025/Vertex 1 donated to endurance testing)
3: Asus U31JG - X25-M G2 160GB
technically it does have µop cache. On bulldozer it's trace cache in between L1 and L2 cache it's suppose to be like part of the L2 cache some how.
HAVE NO FEAR!
"AMD fallen angel"
"Behold the gaseous stench of Skeletor's breakfast burrito!"
You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.
if Anand over looked this, that mean their article is not even in depth enough?
Main Rig:
Processor & Motherboard:AMD Phenom II x6 1090T / Asus Crosshair Formula III
Random Access Memory Module:Kingston KVM 2x4GB DDR3-1333MHz
Graphic Card:Sapphire HD6770 1GB
Power Supply Unit:OCZ ModxStream 650W
Storage Unit:Seagate 500GB Hdd
Processor Heatsink Fan:CoolerMaster V6GT
Chasis:Thermaltake Level 10GTS Black
it say it go's back to memory for a L2 cache miss, higher memory = better.
HAVE NO FEAR!
"AMD fallen angel"
"Behold the gaseous stench of Skeletor's breakfast burrito!"
You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.
Tomshardware has early Trinity review up! AMD Trinity On The Desktop: A10, A8, And A6 Get Benchmarked!
15% faster than bulldozer at the same clocks.
Not bad at all! That certainly looks good. Zambezi's piledriver replacement is probably going to be even faster.
as fast as (or slightly better) than Llano at the same rated TDP looks excellent.
I may actually prefer this over Vishera for the iGPU for encoding purposes... and hopefully encoding apps supports OpenCL by that time.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
