Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 199

Thread: AMD HD 6990 (Photos!!)

  1. #26
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lima, Peru
    Posts
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by kaktus1907 View Post
    reminds me old VHS cassettes
    Your sig is training in anticipation xD.
    Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
    | Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"

    Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
    Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)

    Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
    Reality check

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    791
    get the EK people on the phone, they need to start making some waterblocks for this baby!

  3. #28
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,124
    Looking forward for 6990 to come out my next card! looks like 580Gtx will have to be sold!6990 crossfire come on!

  4. #29
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Quote Originally Posted by antiacid View Post
    get the EK people on the phone, they need to start making some waterblocks for this baby!
    He try to rest after CES XS Party ... no phone for again a week.

    I like how look this card, just black, red...
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  5. #30
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,550
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthShader View Post
    Yeah, the fan is in the middle. Ensures both chips get fresh air. Downside it, half of the heat gets dumped back into the case. :S
    I don't think that blows out, the is perpendicular, and sucks air from the power connector end of card, as well as bottom

  6. #31
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    157
    I hope this doesn't turn up to be 2x8pin tea heater.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lima, Peru
    Posts
    600
    It's the top end, you should expect that specially when it's done at the same 40nm as the 5970.
    Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
    | Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"

    Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
    Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)

    Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
    Reality check

  8. #33
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles/Hong Kong
    Posts
    3,058
    That thing looks exactly like a VHS tape!!
    Team XS: xs4s.org



  9. #34
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    Quote Originally Posted by KoHaN69 View Post
    I don't think that blows out, the is perpendicular, and sucks air from the power connector end of card, as well as bottom
    um, no.

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near Venice as they say
    Posts
    1,314
    Quote Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal View Post
    guys the fan in the middle look here



    like XFX HD 5970 Black Edition Limited

    Not that much of a good option...
    TRUE Lapped - Intel Core i7 2600k 4,7Ghz - ASRock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 - Nvidia GTX 1080 FE - 16Gb Crucial 2133 Mhz CL9 1,51v - Crucial M4 256Gb - Crucial MX300 1050Gb - Corsair AX850 - Fractal Define R3


  11. #36
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    310
    Wonder if it will unlock?

  12. #37
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    195
    It will probably have full set of SPs, so nothing to unlock.

  13. #38
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    sorry, excuse my bluntness, but whats the point of a 6990?
    quad 6970 will be much faster, probably even 6950s in tri xfire...
    its not going to cost less than 700$, so it will have worse price perf than xfire or quad xfire as well...
    and even if it WOULD cost less than 700, thats only justified as its slower than 2 350$ 6970s...
    its going to run hotter than 2 cards in sli as well...

    really, i dont get it, whats the point?
    its pure marketing of claiming the "fastest card" which nobody cares about except for whoever happens to have the "fastest card" at the point in time, isnt it?

  14. #39
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,247
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    sorry, excuse my bluntness, but whats the point of a 6990?
    quad 6970 will be much faster, probably even 6950s in tri xfire...
    its not going to cost less than 700$, so it will have worse price perf than xfire or quad xfire as well...
    and even if it WOULD cost less than 700, thats only justified as its slower than 2 350$ 6970s...
    its going to run hotter than 2 cards in sli as well...

    really, i dont get it, whats the point?
    its pure marketing of claiming the "fastest card" which nobody cares about except for whoever happens to have the "fastest card" at the point in time, isnt it?
    just one question: why not? it'll have its benefits and since there have always been people who bought dual-gpu cards its existence is more than justified.

    supply and demand. if there was no demand, dual-gpu cards would be dead already.
    1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile


    2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W

  15. #40
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by RaZz! View Post
    just one question: why not? it'll have its benefits and since there have always been people who bought dual-gpu cards its existence is more than justified.

    supply and demand. if there was no demand, dual-gpu cards would be dead already.
    why not?
    well then why not make a 5gpu vga even though only 4 can be used in xfire?
    why not make a dual gpu card and have the second gpu not connected to a bridge chip, its just eating power and producing heat

    come on man, you can just throw out a product on the market hoping that some people will buy it without realising its a pointless product to begin with

    then again, ageias ppu worked out well, bigfoots killer nic worked out well... but those guys hypnotized people with PR, theres no 6990 pr whatsoever... so i doubt itll do well...

  16. #41
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    whoever wants max perf and not semi braindead is on a quad vga capable board already, so they will upgrade to 6970 or 6950 quad or switch to sli, why would anybody go 6990?

  17. #42
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    195
    Well, there are folks out there without even pciexpress 2.0 support.Arent there 1155/1156 sockets kinda limited in the pci express department too ?
    And it will most likely consume less power than 2xfired 6850s.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    USA /okla
    Posts
    2,103
    water cooled will be my solution to heat and noise

    This all depends on its speed and price.
    i7 6700K @4.8 ghz
    XSPC RayStorm (very nice block)
    Z170 Sabertooh ,, 32GB- Gskill (15-15-15-36 @3600 mhz) 1:1
    XFX-7970 with Swiftech Komodo nickel block
    Water Cooling - MO-RA3 Pro with 4 Silverstone 180mm @ 700 rpm, Twin Vario mcp-655 pumps
    Samsung 850-1TB SSD,, OCZ ZX-1250W (powerfull and silent)
    Crossfire 30" decent monitor for IPS too bad SED tech died

    Docsis2.0 Docsis3.0

    -- People who reject the idea that "government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality" give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition.

  19. #44
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by RaV666 View Post
    Well, there are folks out there without even pciexpress 2.0 support.Arent there 1155/1156 sockets kinda limited in the pci express department too ?
    And it will most likely consume less power than 2xfired 6850s.
    yeah, people without even pciE 2.0 support are going to buy a 700$ dualgpu vga... :P

    and whether you run one 6990 at 16x or two 6970s at 8x, the 6970s will still be faster... dual 6990 each running at 8x doesnt make sense, first of all you lose perf, and second, who saves 100$ on board+cpu when spending 1400$ on vgas? 0_o

    and a 6990, a dual 6970, will consume less power than two 6850s?

    and yeah, you can watercool two 6990, but you can do the same with 3 6950s, probably spend the same on watercooling, but pay less for the cards and get the same perf out of it...

  20. #45
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,247
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    why not?
    well then why not make a 5gpu vga even though only 4 can be used in xfire?
    why not make a dual gpu card and have the second gpu not connected to a bridge chip, its just eating power and producing heat

    come on man, you can just throw out a product on the market hoping that some people will buy it without realising its a pointless product to begin with

    then again, ageias ppu worked out well, bigfoots killer nic worked out well... but those guys hypnotized people with PR, theres no 6990 pr whatsoever... so i doubt itll do well...
    because there is a breakeven point where producing and selling such a card let's a company make money on a product. furthermore there are things known as standards and form factors. a dual-gpu is the only thing you can do with the current standards.
    e.g. a 4gpu card would cost too much to produce and be too clunky (dual pcb 3 slot graphics card anyone?) - nobody would buy it and amd (or whoever) wouldn't make any money on it at all.
    1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile


    2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W

  21. #46
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    AMD has to go forward with 6990, they have put a lot of prestige in it. they have delayed it once, and have no excuse to drop it now.
    Fans are waiting for a mighty card, and that matters to a lot of loyal fans.

    Besides, they have to do something to keep nVidia in shock from the top. They can't just sit and watch them to sweep the marked top down.

    Most importantly, it batter be competitive, and come om time. We all need it for a price-break at high-end.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  22. #47
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    Adding to the drawbacks already mentioned, for the consumer I don't see how this is a good choice over separate cards because of the cost. Unless they make it really competitive with msrp like $500. The last good dual gpu card to buy was the 4870x2 because places like BB sold it for $379.
    Only 2 ideal scenarios I can think of to buy this over separate 6950/70 cards.

    -Limited space on the motherboard and you really want to keep it.
    -Small Case, limited space inside where the bottom 2nd card would run out of space to fit in.

    I wish AMD would ditch the dual gpu card strategy already especially as gpu die sizes are now hitting the landmark 28nm and beyond.

  23. #48
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    529
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    sorry, excuse my bluntness, but whats the point of a 6990?
    quad 6970 will be much faster, probably even 6950s in tri xfire...
    6990 is two GPU's. So I don't know why you're comparing them.

  24. #49
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    sorry, excuse my bluntness, but whats the point of a 6990?
    quad 6970 will be much faster, probably even 6950s in tri xfire...
    its not going to cost less than 700$, so it will have worse price perf than xfire or quad xfire as well...
    and even if it WOULD cost less than 700, thats only justified as its slower than 2 350$ 6970s...
    its going to run hotter than 2 cards in sli as well...

    really, i dont get it, whats the point?
    its pure marketing of claiming the "fastest card" which nobody cares about except for whoever happens to have the "fastest card" at the point in time, isnt it?
    I would say that that actually is part of the whole exercise.

    And usually these dual cards are priced a bit lower than if you bought two equivalent cards for crossfire. You end up saving space and money.
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  25. #50

    Exclamation

    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    sorry, excuse my bluntness, but whats the point of a 6990?
    quad 6970 will be much faster, probably even 6950s in tri xfire...
    AMD is just making something that Nvidia cant. With their smaller die strategy, taking into account PCI-E certification they wont go over 300W TDP and voila you have the fastest card on the market.

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •