New Method for Glasses Free 3D

**StAndrew** · 01-16-2011, 07:09 AM

Imagine putting those one someone sleeping...

**Sn0wm@n** · 01-16-2011, 07:20 AM

LOLL this video is epic lol

**eric66** · 01-16-2011, 08:23 AM

lol you can torture with this thing

**jmke** · 01-16-2011, 10:05 AM

blinkmaster 3000

**STEvil** · 01-16-2011, 04:11 PM

Originally Posted by NEOAethyr

Actually I thaught it would be:
120hz, 2d, 60fps.
120hz, 3d, split to 2 eyes, 60hz per eye and 30fps per eye.

That algo seems to be related to interlaced frames though, but...
I do know that 60hz, for 29.97 ntsc fps is not enough to keep in sync with a capture input.
Just 2hz more is enough to keep it in sync without causing framerate issues after a period of time.

Interlaced is split into a 2 fields, bottom and top, for every refresh sync thing it's 1/2 a frame.
60hz = 30fps, slightly more then ntsc.
120hz, is what some would prefer for gaming, like me, 60fps.

But is 120hz on a proscan monitor actually 120fps?
I don't know, because what I heard is that you can do 3d at 60hz, but since it's split into 2 fields for left and right, you get 30hz per eye and 15fps.

That and if a proscan monitor and vga card did 60hz, why would it drop frames from an ntsc source if it was really 60fps? (no buffering using graphedit to watch the raw stream, does so on 3 diff phillips capture chip models)

So I think it's fps = 1/2 of the hz.
And if it's 3d, it's 1/2 the hz per eye.

Thought you were talking about LCD's. 120hz is needed for 60fps per eye 3D on an LCD. 60hz gets you 30fps per eye. Every hz is an image update so you only have to take half the hz number to get the FPS per eye on an LCD.