Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Noob question: Testing memory stability

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    473

    Noob question: Testing memory stability

    Hey guys,

    When overclocking memory I used to use memtest86 and memtest86+.
    But out of convenience I started using Win7 memory diagnostic tool.

    Is this a sufficient tool for testing stability of memory?

    Thanks,
    Drizzt
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobbylite View Post
    with great MHZ comes great responsibility
    CPU:Q6600 G0 @ 3.825
    Motherboard:Asus P5E X38
    Memory:2x2GB OCZ Reapers DDR2 1066
    Graphics Card:Asus 4850
    Hard Drive:2xSegate 500gb 32MB Cache raid0
    Power Supply:Xion 800W
    Case:3DAurora
    CPU cooling: D-tek Fuzion V2 (Quad insert removed)
    GPU cooling: mcw60
    Monitor:24" LG

  2. #2
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    I'd stick with memtest, even Linx/IBT stresses memory quite well..

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny87au View Post
    I'd stick with memtest, even Linx/IBT stresses memory quite well..
    Yea your probably right, but is there anything wrong with the windows memory tester? It's so easy to press f8, escape, tab and enter and have it do my biznaz.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobbylite View Post
    with great MHZ comes great responsibility
    CPU:Q6600 G0 @ 3.825
    Motherboard:Asus P5E X38
    Memory:2x2GB OCZ Reapers DDR2 1066
    Graphics Card:Asus 4850
    Hard Drive:2xSegate 500gb 32MB Cache raid0
    Power Supply:Xion 800W
    Case:3DAurora
    CPU cooling: D-tek Fuzion V2 (Quad insert removed)
    GPU cooling: mcw60
    Monitor:24" LG

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,787
    +1 memtest86+

    I never tried the windows 7 memtest tool I've always used memtest86+, I have for years, I trust it well, and it's very well know & used by most.
    Sandy Bridge 2500k @ 4.5ghz 1.28v | MSI p67a-gd65 B3 Mobo | Samsung ddr3 8gb |
    Swiftech apogee drive II | Coolgate 120| GTX660ti w/heat killer gpu x| Seasonic x650 PSU

    QX9650 @ 4ghz | P5K-E/WIFI-AP Mobo | Hyperx ddr2 1066 4gb | EVGA GTX560ti 448 core FTW @ 900mhz | OCZ 700w Modular PSU |
    DD MC-TDX CPU block | DD Maze5 GPU block | Black Ice Xtreme II 240 Rad | Laing D5 Pump

  5. #5
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by drizzt5 View Post
    Yea your probably right, but is there anything wrong with the windows memory tester? It's so easy to press f8, escape, tab and enter and have it do my biznaz.
    Not quite sure as i havent used it, but im happy and wouldnt change !

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny87au View Post
    Not quite sure as i havent used it, but im happy and wouldnt change !
    Ok well this is now stable according to both, what do you think I should do next?
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobbylite View Post
    with great MHZ comes great responsibility
    CPU:Q6600 G0 @ 3.825
    Motherboard:Asus P5E X38
    Memory:2x2GB OCZ Reapers DDR2 1066
    Graphics Card:Asus 4850
    Hard Drive:2xSegate 500gb 32MB Cache raid0
    Power Supply:Xion 800W
    Case:3DAurora
    CPU cooling: D-tek Fuzion V2 (Quad insert removed)
    GPU cooling: mcw60
    Monitor:24" LG

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by drizzt5 View Post
    what do you think I should do next?
    Overclock it until it hertz

    To be cliché
    You're telling my I have a computer!?
    Because I don't!

  8. #8
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by drizzt5 View Post
    Ok well this is now stable according to both, what do you think I should do next?
    Try run command rate 1, if not its ok.. I havent overclocked a 775 since my old Q9650, use to love overclocking back then was alot more trickier compared to now... Anyways leave timings loose find your Highest overclock and tighten timings once your happy with your overclock..

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  9. #9
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    plan3t 3@rth
    Posts
    987
    Quote Originally Posted by drizzt5 View Post
    Ok well this is now stable according to both, what do you think I should do next?

    buy black ops and enjoy it...
    Stacker830 Watercooled
    windows7 ultimate 64 bit!!!
    heatkiller(rev3) on 2500k@ 4.5ghz 1.35v,8 gigs 2133 ripjaws 1.5v
    Swiftech Mcp-655,1/2in tygon,13x120 sunnons on junk ps,
    (2)triple 120mm rads,Biostar TP67XE(rev 5.2)
    150 gig velicraptor (stable drive) ssds r still buggy!!
    xfi-xtrememusic,klipsch ultras, sen hd-595s
    Evga Hydro gtX 590,co0lermaster-1250 watt,
    24" Sony fw-900 black ops at @ 2304x1440 85hz/85fps SOLID
    G@m3r 4 L1Fe!!

    http://s76.photobucket.com/albums/j1...0VIEW%20ALL--/
    3dmark 11 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1102387

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by railmeat View Post
    buy black ops and enjoy it...
    Already played it.
    SP was alright but BFBC2 multiplayer is much better.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobbylite View Post
    with great MHZ comes great responsibility
    CPU:Q6600 G0 @ 3.825
    Motherboard:Asus P5E X38
    Memory:2x2GB OCZ Reapers DDR2 1066
    Graphics Card:Asus 4850
    Hard Drive:2xSegate 500gb 32MB Cache raid0
    Power Supply:Xion 800W
    Case:3DAurora
    CPU cooling: D-tek Fuzion V2 (Quad insert removed)
    GPU cooling: mcw60
    Monitor:24" LG

  11. #11
    I am Xtreme Ket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    6,822
    HCI memtest (its a windows GUI) WAY better than memtest86/+

    "Prowler"
    X570 Tomahawk | R7 3700X | 2x16GB Klevv BoltX @ 3600MHz CL18 | Powercolor 6800XT Red Devil | Xonar DX 7.1 | 2TB Barracuda | 256GB & 512GB Asgard NVMe drives | 2x DVD & Blu-Ray opticals | EVGA Supernova 1000w G2

    Cooling:

    6x 140mm LED fans, 1x 200mm LED fan | Modified CoolerMaster Masterliquid 240

    Asrock Z77 thread! | Asrock Z77 Extreme6 Review | Asrock P67 Extreme4 Review | Asrock P67 Extreme4/6 Pro3 thread | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 thread | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Review | Asrock Z68 Gen3 Thread | 8GB G-Skill review | TK 2.ZERO homepage | P5Q series mBIOS thread
    Modded X570 Aorus UEFIs

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    111
    Quote Originally Posted by Ket View Post
    HCI memtest (its a windows GUI) WAY better than memtest86/+
    So if I have a dual core, I open two instances and run them both? I think if HCI memtest is better, it'd be great since it's a lot more convenient

  13. #13
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    598
    Yeah, number of instances equals number of cores. Just make sure to assign (total memory - size allocated by Windows)/number of cores to avoid testing your pagefile instead of memory. Failing to do so will lead to Memtest writing to the pagefile more than actually stressing the memory.
    ..:Core i7 870///eVGA P55 Classified///VTX3D Radeon 6970///Asus Xonar D2X///16GB F3-12800CL9D-8GBXL///WD 6400AAKS 640Gb///Samsung F2 EcoGreen 1.5TB///Samsung F4 EcoGreen 2TB///Pioneer DVR 216///Seasonic X-series 850///Corsair Obsidian 800D///Logitech G15 rev.1///Logitech G400@Zowie G-TF Spawn///Philips 240SW:..

    ..:EK Supreme Acetal///Bitspower Black Freezer EIP55NSC///Magicool Pro III///S-Flex E@7v///Laing DDC-1T w/ EK Plexi top///EK Multioption 150:..

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,674
    Quote Originally Posted by Ket View Post
    HCI memtest (its a windows GUI) WAY better than memtest86/+
    Define better. Does it actually stress better where it'll pass memtest86+ but fail hci memtest?

  15. #15
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    .ID
    Posts
    320
    Quote Originally Posted by Ket View Post
    HCI memtest (its a windows GUI) WAY better than memtest86/+
    Any memory test that run under gui or windoze will never beat memtest86+ in term of range and flexibility.

    Just a simple example, how the heck that program able to test the ram occupied by windows os kernel or other bloated os code that is not swappable ? Guess you will never understand this either, don't you ?

  16. #16
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,634
    Is HCI Memtest an in-OS memory tester? I'd love one of those so I can do quick tweaks.
    Signatures make my posts look huge... but I'm not humble enough to completely remove my signature, so I kept this note explaining it.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by ScottALot View Post
    Is HCI Memtest an in-OS memory tester? I'd love one of those so I can do quick tweaks.
    Yes it is, ive tryed it a while back and didnt like it, Not sure how you can test your dimm's once loaded into OS, i say memtest86+ is better imo as it runs in a prompt using no memory..

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    173
    Quote Originally Posted by bing View Post
    Any memory test that run under gui or windoze will never beat memtest86+ in term of range and flexibility.

    Just a simple example, how the heck that program able to test the ram occupied by windows os kernel or other bloated os code that is not swappable ? Guess you will never understand this either, don't you ?

    Yeah, your screwed if the memory error just happens to be used up by the OS.

    This is why it is much better to use a program that uses as small of a footprint as possible, so you can test ALL your RAM, not just X - OS - all the other drivers/resident programs that got loaded.

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    118
    I always start testing with a blend test using Prime95 and a mem test using Burn In. After finding stable options, I verify using memtest. It is just my process, but it seems to treat me well.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •