Page 2 of 24 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 593

Thread: GTX 560 Coming soon!

  1. #26
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia / Europe
    Posts
    1,310
    sounds like we might even see some overlaps between different class products

  2. #27
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Budaors, Hungary.
    Posts
    143
    Quote Originally Posted by Pantsu View Post
    No way will GTX 560 be anywhere near GTX 570. Even with full GF104 and 800+Mhz clocks it won't reach that level. Also upping the clocks means this card won't have much of an OC ability left. Most likely this will compete against 6950 at 300$ level.
    Most likely the GPU clocks will be around ~770MHz. With the extra block enabled and the raised clocks it should be around the HD5870 / GTX 470 performance mark.

    "We are going to hell, so bring your sunblock..."

  3. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    Don't they need an official product to combat a 6870 first?
    This thing wouldn't just compete... it'll MURDER the 6870. No speculation required on that, the 6870 couldn't keep up with a plain GTX 460 at those clocks, with the shaders bumped up like that it won't even be close.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  4. #29
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ROMANIA
    Posts
    687
    2. GTX580's maximum overclock is around 900Mhz. How is it possible for a chip of the same architecture to have 875Mhz base clock? It's possible that shader-to-core clock ratio is reduced but then high clock doesn't tell anything about actual performance without knowing shader domain clock.
    GTX 460 achieved high clocks because of the smaller die-size and because of the less tranzistor.
    Combine this with the tweaked GF110 silicon and you will have even higher clocks.
    And by the way GTX 570 have a 219W TDP and it's a huge chip, 529mm2.
    Think a 350mm2 chip what TDP will have.
    And probably the GTX 560 will have a higher voltage than GTX 460, but still almost same oc. headrom.
    Still Nvidia is starting to equal Amd in Gpu frecuencys, GTX 560 might do this(only 6870 at 900Mhz will be higher), and we know, clock/clock Nvidia is a little faster.
    i5 2500K@ 4.5Ghz
    Asrock P67 PRO3


    P55 PRO & i5 750
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966385
    239 BCKL validation on cold air
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966536
    Almost 5hgz , air.

  5. #30
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    73
    Quote Originally Posted by xdan View Post
    GTX 460 achieved high clocks because of the smaller die-size and because of the less tranzistor.
    Combine this with the tweaked GF110 silicon and you will have even higher clocks.
    GTX460 achieved clocks similar to GTX580 because GF104 already has most of the tweaks included in GF110. So any further increase is possible, but it'll be not as large as before.

  6. #31
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Quote Originally Posted by sergiojr View Post
    GTX460 achieved clocks similar to GTX580 because GF104 already has most of the tweaks included in GF110. So any further increase is possible, but it'll be not as large as before.
    I'm pretty sure the GF104 didn't have the actual changes in transistors that the GF110 did. The GF104 just removed a lot of the features geared towards professional use, which cut down the transistor count by a fair margin.

    I could be wrong, but I'm pretty doubtful of it. The power usage would've been quite a bit lower on the GTX460 had that been the case.

    Care to provide a link with such statements?
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  7. #32
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    62
    Anyone know how valid the date is? Was looking at self gifting a 460 for the holidays, and have been putting it off due to bills and such but with this possibly coming late January, I'd be willing to hold off just a bit more and be a little more frugal anyhow for a better product.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    409
    Given it's just a rumor from China I wouldn't hold my breath just yet. Of course I don't really see why Nvidia would need to wait so January might be entirely possible.
    "No, you'll warrant no villain's exposition from me."

  9. #34
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    875 MHs seems really high, 30% compared to TGX 460

  10. #35
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    A full 384 shaders even in the mid 7xx clock range would be a nice very competitive piece of gpu. I would imagine if they do offer 875 as a std clock they will probably also have a number of scaled down core configs to fill the void down to what would be the 550.
    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  11. #36
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    Quote Originally Posted by Pantsu View Post
    Given it's just a rumor from China I wouldn't hold my breath just yet. Of course I don't really see why Nvidia would need to wait so January might be entirely possible.
    well considering the GTX 580 and GTX 570 were "rumors from China" and merely weeks after are on store shelves. It seems like Nvidia has been pulling allot or new GPU's out of no-ware lately. maybe we will get lucky and it will be around shortly, we could use a good GPU to occupy the gap between the GTX 470 and the 6950
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  12. #37
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,821
    Very nice. What would it take to match a 470@800/1600/1848? I love my 470, but it dumps so much heat into my case.
    Desktop:
    Antec 300
    Foxcon A7AD-S 790GX
    8GB Gskill PC-1066@5/5/5/12
    PII X940 BE @3.6GHZ
    Sunbeam Core Contact
    2x 640GB in Raid 0+1
    4870 512MB@800/1000
    Vista Business 64bit W/ SP1

  13. #38
    Xtreme XIP
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,559
    Sounds interesting , lets hope it does not take 6 months to be available

  14. #39
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    573
    hopefully this comes out before my 5870 dies. all i know is im never buying ati again, cant handle the proness of the drivers.
    we going shh around the corner

  15. #40
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    588
    Another rumor say that this card GTX 560 will come Officially with These frequencies : 820/1640/2000MHz, As we knew from beginning this card will use core GF114 and will have 384 CUDA core and this card will Release in January 20. the New information Talk about this card that will come 38% faster than GTX 460 1GB !!



    Source

  16. #41
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    399
    That would put it on roughly equal terms as 6950 and ca. 10% slower than a GTX570 - which might hurt it sales. Otoh, they will finally be able to ask a decent price for the GTX560.

  17. #42
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Even at 820mhz this thing is going to take heads if it's priced similar to what we saw out of the 460 at launch. I'm expecting ~$250, not $300 like the 6950... To give you an idea, 800mhz on a GTX460 easily traded blows with a GTX 470. Adding those extra shaders should make this come extremely close to the GTX570. Overclocking will DEFINITELY catch the GTX570, and lucky cards should actually be able to PASS that card.

    Fwiw, you already know palit will likely make a 2gb version of this, much like they did with the 460. Should help for those of you who demand top-resolution, seeing as how overclocking will probably allow you to hit the performance level where the ram can actually be put to use. Might be worth keeping an eye on, considering these days the price difference is $10 between the 1gb and 2gb(at microcenter, check yourself).

    Either way, those eyeing the 6950 might be wise to wait it off for this release, merely to drop the price of the 6950 if nothing else. Even if you're already decided upon the 6950 and nothing can change your mind on it, if this is priced like I think it'll be we should see some big price drops on that card next month.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  18. #43
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Home- Minnesota
    Posts
    501
    This seems likely.
    Donate to XS.org


    "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Ben Franklin
    "Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves, therefore, are its only safe depositories." -Thomas Jefferson

    "He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."-Thomas Paine

  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    I think AMD obvious response would be a 1gb 6950. Could definitely be sold around the 250 region.
    Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
    6gb OCZ platinum
    4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
    2*640 WD Blacks
    750GB Seagate.

  20. #45
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,128
    1) I'm almost drooling; 875 MHz would definitely be great.
    2) Comparing Nvidia's TDP and AMD's Max Board Power is like comparing apples to oranges. They mean completely different things and can not be compared 1:1. I would say that Nvidia's ~180 W TDP is AMD's ~225 W MBP. The reasoning is that Max Board Power literally means the maximum power draw sustained by the whole product, while TDP means just the thermal load put on the cooling solution to sustain while keeping the GPU/other parts temperature below the maximum junction temperature. I made a quite long post about this some weeks ago and compared 5970 and GTX 480; it was clear that Nvidia's TDP is much closer to the typical power draw than AMD's Max Board Power, which is more or less the "theoretical max" set by the manufacturer and controller by the power management.

    Thus said; If GTX 560 can increase the perf/W and put pressure on AMD then I'm more than happy; everybody wins.

  21. #46
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montana, USA
    Posts
    503
    The killer feature for me on this card will be full bitstreaming of HD audio streams over HDMI. Because it is based on GF104, it is logical to assume it will include this feature.

    I would have bought a GTX570 already, but they have not added this feature into GF110 for whatever reason and that is a huge dissapointment. This upcoming GTX560 will be the first card to offer upper mid-range performance AND include the audio bitstreaming.

    I know I am in the minority as one who runs everything thru a A/V reciever, but this is a make or break feature for me. The 6950/6970 are also appealing because they include this, but I will wait to see how the GTX560 stacks up before deciding.
    i7-2600K @ 4806Mhz 102.3x47 1.368v LinX stable
    MSI P67 GD-80
    16Gb Corsair 8-8-8-24 1T 818.2Mhz
    MSI GTX560Ti 1005/2250 1.062v
    Crucial m4 256Gb SSD
    Corsair TX850 | 64bit WIN7 Pro
    Custom watercooling
    47" 1080p LCD | Onkyo 876/ Polk 5.1 surround

  22. #47
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lima, Peru
    Posts
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by DilTech View Post
    Even at 820mhz this thing is going to take heads if it's priced similar to what we saw out of the 460 at launch. I'm expecting ~$250, not $300 like the 6950... To give you an idea, 800mhz on a GTX460 easily traded blows with a GTX 470. Adding those extra shaders should make this come extremely close to the GTX570. Overclocking will DEFINITELY catch the GTX570, and lucky cards should actually be able to PASS that card.

    Fwiw, you already know palit will likely make a 2gb version of this, much like they did with the 460. Should help for those of you who demand top-resolution, seeing as how overclocking will probably allow you to hit the performance level where the ram can actually be put to use. Might be worth keeping an eye on, considering these days the price difference is $10 between the 1gb and 2gb(at microcenter, check yourself).

    Either way, those eyeing the 6950 might be wise to wait it off for this release, merely to drop the price of the 6950 if nothing else. Even if you're already decided upon the 6950 and nothing can change your mind on it, if this is priced like I think it'll be we should see some big price drops on that card next month.

    Regular 6950 will probably keep it's price. They can release a 1GB version for less price.

    HD6950 2GB $299
    HD6950 1GB $269?

    With the release of 6950 current 6870 doesn't make any sense. Rumors point some price-cuts in january.
    Last edited by Nintendork; 12-18-2010 at 11:10 AM.
    Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
    | Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"

    Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
    Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)

    Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
    Reality check

  23. #48

  24. #49
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Not surprising.
    Looks good, though! The clocks are quite high. Now if someone released non-reference 2GB versions of these...

    Edit: GPU-Z 0.4.8 does not know GTX560, so I am referring just to the clocks.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  25. #50
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Not surprising.
    Looks good, though! The clocks are quite high. Now if someone released non-reference 2GB versions of these...

    Edit: GPU-Z 0.4.8 does not know GTX560, so I am referring just to the clocks.
    I am pretty much promising that palit will make a 2gb version of this, much like they did with the GTX460.

    Frankly speaking, I'd be in shock if they didn't.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nintendork View Post
    Regular 6950 will probably keep it's price. They can release a 1GB version for less price.

    HD6950 2GB $299
    HD6950 1GB $269?

    With the release of 6950 current 6870 doesn't make any sense. Rumors point some price-cuts in january.
    If NVidia hits the expected $249 mark with the GTX560 then even at $269 the 1gb card will still be over-priced if this card performs as it would seem like it should. For $269 you'll probably be able to get a 2gb GTX 560.

    Like I said, AMD will probably have to drop their 6950 prices. The 6870 and 6850 will be forced to the $199 and $149 brackets as well I would think, as obviously the remaining GTX 460's will end up dropping in price to make room and clear stock.

    Essentially, no matter which brand you plan on buying from, if you're eyeing the mid-range($150-300 bracket) it'll be worth your while to wait for this card's release, even if for some reason you refuse to ever buy a NVidia card. Bit-tech kind of beat around the bush about it in their 6950 review by saying that if you wait a little longer you may be handsomely rewarded.
    Last edited by DilTech; 12-20-2010 at 08:47 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

Page 2 of 24 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •