Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 40

Thread: x4 vs x6 for gaming?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    263

    x4 vs x6 for gaming?

    Is there a difference?
    I usually game at 1920 x 1080, would I notice a performance increase between a quad core or a 6-core CPU?
    Don't really care about future proofing right now.....
    Gigabyte z68 UD3
    2600k @ stock
    8Gb G Skill
    2x eVGA GTX 680 @ stock
    Intel 320 80Gb
    Intel 320 120Gb x2
    Intel 320 160Gb x2

  2. #2
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    For gaming, most likely not.

    Most games are single threaded and the ones that are multi-threaded usually don't scale past three cores or so.

    If you were doing video encoding or heavy multitasking the X6 would help out.
    Smile

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    For gaming, most likely not.

    Most games are single threaded and the ones that are multi-threaded usually don't scale past three cores or so.

    If you were doing video encoding or heavy multitasking the X6 would help out.
    Yeah that's what I thought as well.
    Also figured the x4 might actually be faster because it probably clocks higher.
    Gigabyte z68 UD3
    2600k @ stock
    8Gb G Skill
    2x eVGA GTX 680 @ stock
    Intel 320 80Gb
    Intel 320 120Gb x2
    Intel 320 160Gb x2

  4. #4
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by schoolslave View Post
    Yeah that's what I thought as well.
    Also figured the x4 might actually be faster because it probably clocks higher.
    Actually, they are about the same clock wise. If you have decent cooling the X6's clock higher than Deneb (X4) sometimes.
    Smile

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    Actually, they are about the same clock wise. If you have decent cooling the X6's clock higher than Deneb (X4) sometimes.
    Ah, didn't know that.
    I haven't actually overclocked since s939....lol.
    Gigabyte z68 UD3
    2600k @ stock
    8Gb G Skill
    2x eVGA GTX 680 @ stock
    Intel 320 80Gb
    Intel 320 120Gb x2
    Intel 320 160Gb x2

  6. #6
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by schoolslave View Post
    Don't really care about future proofing right now.....
    In this case, get 4 core.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,787
    More and more games are taking advantage of quads now, soon they will be taking advantage of more cores. So I'd say go for the hexacore if you would like to be a little more future proof.

    I had this same argument going on in my mind a few years ago, i.e. should I go with a fast dual, or a basic quad. Well I wish I would have gone quad now.
    Sandy Bridge 2500k @ 4.5ghz 1.28v | MSI p67a-gd65 B3 Mobo | Samsung ddr3 8gb |
    Swiftech apogee drive II | Coolgate 120| GTX660ti w/heat killer gpu x| Seasonic x650 PSU

    QX9650 @ 4ghz | P5K-E/WIFI-AP Mobo | Hyperx ddr2 1066 4gb | EVGA GTX560ti 448 core FTW @ 900mhz | OCZ 700w Modular PSU |
    DD MC-TDX CPU block | DD Maze5 GPU block | Black Ice Xtreme II 240 Rad | Laing D5 Pump

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    milwaukee
    Posts
    1,683
    x6 will most likely clock higher than c3 deneb unless it is the new denebs that a few people have seen like mad222's 5.1ghz air chip. all amd chips have date/stepping, something like 1045gpmw, if the x4 has 4 letters after the date x6 will clock higher IMO, if it has 3 letters after the date i think it will clock as high or higher than x6

    with all that said go x6
    LEO!!!!
    amd phenom II x6 1100T | gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 . .
    2x2gb g.skill 2133c8 | 128gb g.skill falcon ssd
    sapphire ati 5850 | x-fi xtrememusic. . .
    samsung f4 2tb | samsung dvdrw . .
    corsair tx850w | windows 7 64-bit.
    ddc3.25 xspc restop | ek ltx | mc-tdx | BIP . .
    lycosa-g9-z2300 | 26" 1920x1200 lcd .

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by CrazyNutz View Post
    More and more games are taking advantage of quads now, soon they will be taking advantage of more cores. So I'd say go for the hexacore if you would like to be a little more future proof.

    I had this same argument going on in my mind a few years ago, i.e. should I go with a fast dual, or a basic quad. Well I wish I would have gone quad now.
    My problem here is that Sandy bridge and Bulldozer are right around the corner, but just glancing at my sig reveals I need an update NOW. lol.
    I figure, getting a cheap x4, ram, GTX 570 and Ill be set until this summer.
    Gigabyte z68 UD3
    2600k @ stock
    8Gb G Skill
    2x eVGA GTX 680 @ stock
    Intel 320 80Gb
    Intel 320 120Gb x2
    Intel 320 160Gb x2

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bucharest
    Posts
    138
    If you're going to overclock it, then a hexacore will clock better on the IMC which will boost your ram performance. But if you're going for a dozer/sb setup later next year than i guess a quad will suffice.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by chinook View Post
    If you're going to overclock it, then a hexacore will clock better on the IMC which will boost your ram performance. But if you're going for a dozer/sb setup later next year than i guess a quad will suffice.
    Yep, so it seems general consensus is that the quad will last me until summer and should provide ample overclocking fun.
    Thanks
    Gigabyte z68 UD3
    2600k @ stock
    8Gb G Skill
    2x eVGA GTX 680 @ stock
    Intel 320 80Gb
    Intel 320 120Gb x2
    Intel 320 160Gb x2

  12. #12
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    the core count dose not matter, but the thulban clocks better and has more ram clocking fun. so i would get anything thats a thulban base (there is the 970x4 if u can find it) or just wait the few months for the BD.
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by zanzabar View Post
    the core count dose not matter, but the thulban clocks better and has more ram clocking fun. so i would get anything thats a thulban base (there is the 970x4 if u can find it) or just wait the few months for the BD.
    Waiting is not an option at this point. Look at my sig!
    Gigabyte z68 UD3
    2600k @ stock
    8Gb G Skill
    2x eVGA GTX 680 @ stock
    Intel 320 80Gb
    Intel 320 120Gb x2
    Intel 320 160Gb x2

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    milwaukee
    Posts
    1,683
    lol you got a nice psu at least
    LEO!!!!
    amd phenom II x6 1100T | gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 . .
    2x2gb g.skill 2133c8 | 128gb g.skill falcon ssd
    sapphire ati 5850 | x-fi xtrememusic. . .
    samsung f4 2tb | samsung dvdrw . .
    corsair tx850w | windows 7 64-bit.
    ddc3.25 xspc restop | ek ltx | mc-tdx | BIP . .
    lycosa-g9-z2300 | 26" 1920x1200 lcd .

  15. #15
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by crazydiamond View Post
    lol you got a nice psu at least
    I suppose
    Gigabyte z68 UD3
    2600k @ stock
    8Gb G Skill
    2x eVGA GTX 680 @ stock
    Intel 320 80Gb
    Intel 320 120Gb x2
    Intel 320 160Gb x2

  16. #16
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    Get yourself a decent GPU now and do a complete overhaul next year... Do you need a hefty OC for gaming ? Nope, for gaming you don't need a 4Ghz or higher clocked CPU... being it 4 or 6 cores, high NB speed or not. The difference is inbetween the ears... I'v been testing alot of different GPU/CPUcombos... A quad core at 3.6Ghz handles everything nicely ( not talking about multiple GPU setups...) for the average gamer...
    Last edited by Leeghoofd; 12-12-2010 at 11:56 PM.
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  17. #17
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    Quote Originally Posted by schoolslave View Post
    Waiting is not an option at this point. Look at my sig!
    u just need a gpu, i would still rock a dual core if it clocks nicely as yours should. and maybe a new HDD or an SSD as u have a seagate so slow and deadly to your data.
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    1,070
    you could probably sell off your current cpu+mobo for a decent amount, enough to get a 955BE + mobo for just a little more. Where are you located OP?

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    263
    I'm located in Pennsylvania.
    My rig is outdated though, and I do feel like I need some sort of upgrade over Christmas.
    Gigabyte z68 UD3
    2600k @ stock
    8Gb G Skill
    2x eVGA GTX 680 @ stock
    Intel 320 80Gb
    Intel 320 120Gb x2
    Intel 320 160Gb x2

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    50
    I run 5 instance of my game and I am on a x4 core, I am running @ 80-90% CPU usage across all 4 cores currently.

    I am curious if I had a x6 core if the load would spread across all 6 and lessen the CPU usage?

  21. #21
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    379
    Quote Originally Posted by Confuzzled View Post
    I run 5 instance of my game and I am on a x4 core, I am running @ 80-90% CPU usage across all 4 cores currently.

    I am curious if I had a x6 core if the load would spread across all 6 and lessen the CPU usage?
    Oh yeah, and what game might that be
    Quote Originally Posted by Sister
    Do you really go on your computer...to look at computers?

  22. #22
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    Maybe he runs a dedicated server(s) on his rig
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    50
    Star Wars Galaxies



    yeah yeah I know it is an "old game"

    I am not about to try to run 5 instances of COD Black Ops.

  24. #24
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    379
    Oh and to the OP, for the purpose you stated I would just go with a quad core.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sister
    Do you really go on your computer...to look at computers?

  25. #25
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    379
    Quote Originally Posted by Confuzzled View Post
    Star Wars Galaxies



    yeah yeah I know it is an "old game"

    I am not about to try to run 5 instances of COD Black Ops.
    Haha oh, I was thinking WoW 5 boxing
    Quote Originally Posted by Sister
    Do you really go on your computer...to look at computers?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •