It's seems like ASUS is preparing a board with 4-way multi-GPU suport and 2oz PCB.
ASUS P8P67 WS Revolution – First official informations | lab501 | Translate
Thanks for reading,
matose
It's seems like ASUS is preparing a board with 4-way multi-GPU suport and 2oz PCB.
ASUS P8P67 WS Revolution – First official informations | lab501 | Translate
Thanks for reading,
matose
Last edited by matose; 12-01-2010 at 04:03 PM.
Born to lose, live to win!
One of the strengths that differentiate the new model series WS normal P8P67 is effective over 92% of the power stage. This is possible because the UPR and DIGI + VRM we talked about but also through a technology called True 2oz PCB. Not to be nasty and say they look forward to other technologies of the series 'True': True On / Off Charge eg
Lots of new tech we can look forward to from them: True DualBIOS, True Ultra Durable 3, True Hotkey OC, True Japanese solid caps (this should be an interesting one because you don't get any truer than Japanese made caps), True smart 6, etc... Truly ridiculous!
Is it ATX? or E-ATX?
What's the sense behind for that "True" for both Asus and Asrock? Do they vowed their saying the "true" nothing but the "true" ?
I don't know anything, Don't ask me!!
The board itself simple looks fantastic. I don't like the fact that it has an NF200 on it, but it still may be my next board.
Looks ATX to me,it also looks really nice,and a lot like those MSI boards we've seen earlier.
My Heatware
Originally Posted by some guy on internet
That's your problem right there. Just forget about how things look on paper as that's irrelevant.
ATX
Seven slots, and there's technically no room for more slots, just like a regular ATX.
EATX is usually 264 - 266 mm deep, and also have seven slots, but it's quite common that people get it mixed up.
You can also see the mounting holes in the front of the board, they're in the corner.
Compare with this, it got holes in the front corners, but those are not mounting holes, the mounting holes are almost 1" in.
Last edited by Mats; 12-01-2010 at 07:52 PM.
So asus is using 2oz copper now? Someone over at OCN said they have been for a while, I stated if they are going to use it why not talk about it. Looks like now they are using it. yea the nf200 might not be the best add on chip, but for people with SLI setups there would really be no other way with only 8 x 5GT/s native lanes of PCI-E as well as the USB3 and marvell sata6g bandwidth added. BTW right now lanes run at 2.5GT/s so there are 16x lanes running 2.5GT/s.
Last edited by sin0822; 12-01-2010 at 09:14 PM.
I wonder if ASUS needs to pay any licensing fee to Gigabyte for using 2oz copper PCB, you know in this day every1 licenses everything... anyway you'd easily think they could like use slightly thicker layer and get away with it like that probably.
Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 12-01-2010 at 09:24 PM.
Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs
If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place
Just noticed, 16+2 digital power phase! Damn, that's a lot!
the heatsink doesnt look bad... the fins are a bit crammed next to each other but it looks like an actually well working heatsink, a novelty in mainboard design!
i like the dual intel gbe lan, last i checked it was faster than other NIC chips, so thats cool... dual isnt really necessary but... ah well...
what is tpu? techpowerup? 0_o
and why does it only mention 3sli if it has 4 pciE slots? are you sure it supports quad sli and quad xfire? sounds to me like one of those slots is going through the chipset, which would suck for quad vga operation...
the board has too many white parts to look cool imo... but it doesnt look bad...
and yeah, the pwm sounds sick... do i smell shamino? *sniff sniff*
Lucid Hydra 200, maybe?
It only has a 4.5W TDP.
I hope that it's a real 16+2 phase and not 6 phase with 3 chokes-per-phase.
-
And you think Hydra performs better?
high price also
Intel Core i5 6600K + ASRock Z170 OC Formula + Galax HOF 4000 (8GBx2) + Antec 1200W OC Version
EK SupremeHF + BlackIce GTX360 + Swiftech 655 + XSPC ResTop
Macbook Pro 15" Late 2011 (i7 2760QM + HD 6770M)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) , Huawei Nexus 6P
[history system]80286 80386 80486 Cyrix K5 Pentium133 Pentium II Duron1G Athlon1G E2180 E3300 E5300 E7200 E8200 E8400 E8500 E8600 Q9550 QX6800 X3-720BE i7-920 i3-530 i5-750 Semp140@x2 955BE X4-B55 Q6600 i5-2500K i7-2600K X4-B60 X6-1055T FX-8120 i7-4790K
3-way SLI and 4-way CFX works even without any PCIe bridge, but for 4-way SLI you need two NF200 bridges. ASUS used one NF200 on the WS because the Sandy Bridge CPU doesn't have native 3 GPU support, just 1 x 16x or 2 x 8x
Also, Lucid Hydra 200 is more expensive than the NF200 from what I know...
Born to lose, live to win!
AMD Phenom II BE, ASUS Crosshair II formula, 8gb ddr2 800, 470 SLI, PC P&C 750, arcera RAID, 4x OCZ Vertex2, 2x samsung 7200 1tb, HT Omega Clario +
Bookmarks