Page 4 of 42 FirstFirst 123456714 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 1028

Thread: NVIDIA GTX 595 (picture+Details)

  1. #76
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by Aten-Ra View Post
    It could be done with the following specs

    2x GF110 chips
    2x 480 Shaders @ 600MHz
    2x 320-Bit memory and 2560MB

    Max board power 289W

    Performance could be the same as ~GTX470 SLI


    so you think the thermal specs of 2 GF110 could be kept under 300watt or so at only 600mhz ????
    Last edited by Sn0wm@n; 11-21-2010 at 01:59 AM.
    WILL CUDDLE FOR FOOD

    Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
    Dual proc client systems are like sex in high school. Everyone talks about it but nobody is really doing it.

  2. #77
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Pantsu View Post
    I'm sure they can pull of a dual GF110 with 2x8-pin but imo it's just not worth it if you have to go over 300W. Too hard to keep cool and you can do the same much easier with two cards.
    exactly...

    im pretty sure itll be dual gf114 (gtx460x2)
    and it only makes sense if you run two of them to get quadsli, which nvidia artificially limited/disabled on 460 cards.

    but whats the point of gtx460 quad sli?
    gtx580 quad sli is possible with 4 cards, so...
    its not very user friendly, but i find it hard to imagine that using 2 dual 580 cards will be MORE user friendly than 4 individual cards... 2 dual cards will be slower, noisier and hotter...

    so yeah, i dont really get the point of this...
    the pcb is surprisingly small though... well engineered pcb...

  3. #78
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    1,195
    For a high-end card is there any reason to be limited to air-cooling?

    This wouldn't fit in many mATX cases due to length, so would it really be a big deal to ship the card with a waterblock and the option of a self-contained pump/rad combo?

    2 GPU's would take up 2 pci-e slots, plus the radiator attatching to a fan mounting point either internally or externally.
    Last edited by onewingedangel; 11-21-2010 at 04:51 AM.

  4. #79
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Poland / Rypin
    Posts
    865
    Quote Originally Posted by STEvil View Post
    quad slot cooling solution anyone?
    you mean, dual-head cascade + case
    Schedule of Live Extreme Overclocking - info Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by K404 View Post
    "My Backup is bigger than Your Backup"

  5. #80
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by onewingedangel View Post
    For a high-end card is there any reason to be limited to air-cooling?

    This wouldn't fit in many mATX cases due to length, so would it really be a big deal to ship the card with a waterblock and the option of a self-contained pump/rad combo?

    2 GPU's would take up 2 pci-e slots, plus the radiator attatching to a fan mounting point either internally or externally.
    remember you have to sell a solution that works for 2+ years without touching anything... and then the cost is much higher than aircooling.

    lets take an existing card that is limited by heat, like the 480.
    with air cooling you probably spend 35$ on the heatsink
    with water cooling or something else youd spend 135$ on the cooling alone easily, if not even more. and the resulting improved cooling performance would allow you to run the card 10% faster at best... it just isnt really worth it...

    if it would be, youd see a lot more companies offering 480s with waterblocks or unconventional cooling solutions.

  6. #81
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    17
    Maybe the board is a GF110 + GF104, GF104 being advertised as a co processor for PhysX.

  7. #82
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    235
    Why don't they just encourage people to buy 2 x 460 / 2x 470 / 580 cards and give some discount.

    Then they could edit sys info to tell people they have "GTX 695" or something installed on their system.

    People can then enjoy god-like performance and be happy

  8. #83
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n View Post
    so you think the thermal specs of 2 GF110 could be kept under 300watt or so at only 600mhz ????
    I believe GTX570 with 480 Shaders (15x 32) and 320bit memory could have 210-220W Max Graphics card power usage, that’s the same as GTX275.

    If they could make the GTX295 out of two GTX275, then they can make a dual GF110 card.
    Intel Core i7 920@4GHz, ASUS GENE II, 3 x 4GB DDR-3 1333MHz Kingston, 2x ASUS HD6950 1G CU II, Intel SSD 320 120GB, Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, DELL 2311HM

    AMD FX8150 vs Intel 2500K, 1080p DX-11 gaming evaluation.

  9. #84
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Posts
    1,553
    Quote Originally Posted by donitsi View Post
    Why don't they just encourage people to buy 2 x 460 / 2x 470 / 580 cards and give some discount.

    Then they could edit sys info to tell people they have "GTX 695" or something installed on their system.

    People can then enjoy god-like performance and be happy
    youre on to something and I further add to your input by saying they could sell sli combos in one box. picture a giant box that bundles two gtx 460 for 399$ with a full crysis 2 included. Now whos gonna ignore that!
    Last edited by Dimitriman; 11-21-2010 at 09:02 AM.
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
    Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
    i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
    Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
    Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb

  10. #85
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    A dual-GPU has a few advantages, as it's cheaper than tow cards, takes less space and allows better air-flow, etc.., but the biggest advantage is for GPGPU and GPU-farms, due to the limited number of PCI-slots.

    The disadvantage is the extra heat and power in a single card. The PCI-power-limitation can be solved by adding 3 (or even 4) 8-pins connections, but coolers are still a big problem. A better cooler is needed for such a power-monster for sure.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  11. #86
    Nerdy Powerlifter
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Down in the Bayou
    Posts
    4,553
    This seems like an interesting solution for guys running mini itx boards like myself, specifically SG07 or capable cases.

    I have a gtx470 now, I wonder how this'll compete w/ the 5970 or gtx580 in general.
    You must [not] advance.


    Current Rig: i7 4790k @ stock (**** TIM!) , Zotac GTX 1080 WC'd 2214mhz core / 5528mhz Mem, Asus z-97 Deluxe

    Heatware

  12. #87
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by Aten-Ra View Post
    It could be done with the following specs

    2x GF110 chips
    2x 480 Shaders @ 600MHz
    2x 320-Bit memory and 2560MB

    Max board power 289W

    Performance could be the same as ~GTX470 SLI, but better performance in DX-11 tessellation due to 2 more polymorph engines
    Way too low power consumption estimate.
    Also, 2.5GB dual GF100 vs 4Gb Antilles looks weak... Especially since they are going to compete at 4MP+ resolutions.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  13. #88
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    system load power: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/GPU/1...69.168.166.167

    an extra "275" in the 295 adds ~50W.

    an extra 285 in SLI adds ~100W.


    system perf: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/GPU/88?i=169.168.166.167

    an extra "275" in the 295 adds ~15fps

    an extra 285 in SLI adds ~22fps.


    the 295 is more efficient. they are able to produce a card with two hot chips by introducing new efficiencies.

    can they do that with GF110? consider that the power draw of the 275 is close to the power draw of the 470: http://tpucdn.com/reviews/ASUS/GeFor...power_peak.gif

    if the 570 is also close, we can imagine a dual GF110 card is doable.
    Last edited by bamtan2; 11-21-2010 at 12:26 PM.

  14. #89
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    Quote Originally Posted by bamtan2 View Post
    system load power: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/GPU/1...69.168.166.167

    an extra "275" in the 295 adds ~50W.

    an extra 285 in SLI adds ~100W.


    system perf: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/GPU/88?i=169.168.166.167

    an extra "275" in the 295 adds ~15fps

    an extra 285 in SLI adds ~22fps.


    the 295 is more efficient. they are able to produce a card with two hot chips by introducing new efficiencies.

    can they do that with GF110? consider that the power draw of the 275 is close to the power draw of the 470: http://tpucdn.com/reviews/ASUS/GeFor...power_peak.gif

    if the 570 is also close, we can imagine a dual GF110 card is doable.
    you hit the nail on the head, people don't seem to under stand that a dual card is not 2x the power of a single one. there are many improvements that can be made to lower power consumption of 2 full cards. I think dual GTX 570's is perfectly doable...
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  15. #90
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ROMANIA
    Posts
    687
    Yes, indeed, because a dual gpu card has just one PCB, it is much complex, but it's one, not two pcb's.
    It's doable i think two GTX 570 gpu's at lower frecuency, 600Mhz with lower voltage.
    It should be 35-45% faster than GTX 580, but it would be faster than 6990? It depends on what 6970 is.
    i5 2500K@ 4.5Ghz
    Asrock P67 PRO3


    P55 PRO & i5 750
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966385
    239 BCKL validation on cold air
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966536
    Almost 5hgz , air.

  16. #91
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by xdan View Post
    Yes, indeed, because a dual gpu card has just one PCB, it is much complex, but it's one, not two pcb's.
    It's doable i think two GTX 570 gpu's at lower frecuency, 600Mhz with lower voltage.
    It should be 35-45% faster than GTX 580, but it would be faster than 6990? It depends on what 6970 is.
    The 6990 seams to have gone back to drowning-board, and delayed to next year, just after they saw the GTX580, apparently.

    The timing of GTX570 suggests that nVidia is preparing it to to compete with AMD's upcoming single-GPU (6980) too.

    So yes, indeed, it will be interesting to see what comes out of the new-drown 6990, but these delays are suggesting that AMD is straggling. Nothing is clear yet thought, we have to wait and see.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  17. #92
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Posts
    1,553
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    The 6990 seams to have gone back to drowning-board, and delayed to next year, just after they saw the GTX580, apparently.

    The timing of GTX570 suggests that nVidia is preparing it to to compete with AMD's upcoming single-GPU (6980) too.

    So yes, indeed, it will be interesting to see what comes out of the new-drown 6990, but these delays are suggesting that AMD is straggling. Nothing is clear yet thought, we have to wait and see.
    Its not back on the drawing board it was planned to be released 30 days after cayman but as cayman got delayed due to production problems so did antilles. it will not be a paper launch on cayman though and antilles is still dual cayman xt with lower clocks, here is the latest info leaked and what the gtx 595 will go against:

    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
    Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
    i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
    Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
    Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb

  18. #93
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Yeah, I've also heard the rumors that explains those delays smoothly. Lets hope those are the real reasons for tow "strange" delays.

    To me, those delays suggest performance-trouble in AMD-camp, but who knows maybe you are right.

    Anyways. lets hope AMD can compete on performance, with or without going back to drown-aboard, it will be good for competition. With a aggressive nVidia on the ride, a competitive AMD will bring out better and cheaper GPUs from both camps.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  19. #94
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    588
    new Details about this card GeForce GTX 590

    ----------------

    GeForce GTX 590 in February with dual GF110

    the Name will be GTX 590 not GTX 595
    NVIDIA has already set the launch date of GeForce GTX 590 to sometime in February



    With dual GF110 GPUs comes a big memory buffer. GeForce GTX 590 gets 3072 MB graphics memory work with and with dual 384-bit memory buses bandwith shouldn't be a problem. Reference design set with large centered fan

    We have no pictures to show of the card since NVIDIA is holding everything tight before the launch of the new flagship. According to reliable sources to NordicHardware the reference design is set and as expected the card will get a full-cover cooler with a large radial fan in the center. The fan will be around 90mm in diameter and hte card will be very similar to GeForce GTX295 (generation 2), but most likely a bit longer.

    Launch in Febrary with a surprise

    NVIDIA has already set the launch date of GeForce GTX 590 to sometime in February. The exact date was not revealed and from what it seems like it is aiming for a launch similar to the one of GeForce GTX 580, in other words as soon as possible to surprise competitor AMD and the media.

    Today we know more about GeForce GTX 590 than we know about Radeon HD 6990 "Antilles" that sporting dual Cayman GPUs will arrive in February. NVIDIA beat AMD with the new performance series a few months ago, but the question is if they will do it this time too.

  20. #95
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    There's no doubt in my mind these things have been kickin in a development center somewhere. Considering how close power consumption is between the 570 & 6970 I can understand the feasibility of bringing a dual 570 based card to market if AMD can bring a dual 6970 card to market but a full dual 512 shader in retail will definitely be interesting to say the least.

    I'm a bit skeptical but with how they're getting to the point of firing on all cylinders again with their lineup things may get interesting for the top performance enthusiasts.
    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  21. #96
    Xtreme Addict Chrono Detector's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,142
    If those specs are true, then this card will be expensive, though I still find it hard to believe that NVIDIA slapped two GTX 580's into one PCB.
    AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160

  22. #97
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    " a lot "

    hmm..

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  23. #98
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    Quote Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal View Post
    new Details about this card GeForce GTX 590
    it can be done, but I'm skeptical because gf114 is so good. since they are constrained by power, I feel like 300W of gf114 might be just as good as 300W of gf110. BUT maybe the underclocked 580 yields very high efficiency. we've never seen anyone benchmark an undervolted 580 to see.

    it will be very interesting. dual gf110 could be crazy pills.

  24. #99
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Hollywierd, CA
    Posts
    1,284
    Quote Originally Posted by STEvil View Post
    " a lot "

    hmm..
    yeah.... to me, that part makes it all bull$#!7. if they release a duel card it will have the 570 core.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    I am an artist (EDM producer/DJ), pls check out mah stuff.

  25. #100
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Don't Evga was speaking about 2x GF1x4 on last CES when they have present their card ? ( unofficialy ofc )... The GF110's is born way later, when some "sites" have badly report the initial article talking about thoses cards made by jurnalist who was present on CES ( and who have done a nice article about next Evga products ).

    I believe, 2x GF110 low clocked can do the job, even if im a little bit sceptic.
    Last edited by Lanek; 01-27-2011 at 09:34 PM.
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

Page 4 of 42 FirstFirst 123456714 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •