Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: Intel price drops

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dorset, UK
    Posts
    439

    Intel price drops

    First sign of possible seismic shifts in pricing coming with the imminent release of Intel's G3 series...

    Major UK retailer Scan has just dropped pricing of the Intel 80Gb x25-M by almost £20, close to 15%: http://www.scan.co.uk/products/80gb-...ite-70mb-s-oem

    I'm not particularly banging a drum for the Intels (not like some are doing for OWC at any opportunity ), but everyone is aware of their proven reliability even if they aren't the fastest. And for those of us using XP or not in RAID, the free Intel SSD Toolbox is extremely handy for monitoring and keeping the thing in good shape with a proper manual TRIM.

    If you can't wait for G3, this is just excellent value now, and it'll probably get better.
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Software patents are mostly fail wrapped in fail sprinkled with fail and sautéed in a light fail sauce.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    Intel drives are great for reliability, nobody that I know had any problems with them. It's a great price reduction.

    I always see somebody complaining about the Sandforce or Crucial drives.

    Greater Performance + Problems = Sandforce or Crucial.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,597
    Unfortunately the 160Gb drives haven't dropped in price.
    I might pick one up any way to experiment with raid 0 and hIOmon.

    EDIT: I think price drops might be more to do with NAND prices dropping rather than EOL clearance.
    Last edited by Ao1; 10-27-2010 at 05:29 AM.

  4. #4
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    When is G3 coming again?
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,597
    Best guess: Febuary, but possibly earlier.

  6. #6
    Worlds Fastest F5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Room 101, Ministry of Truth
    Posts
    1,615
    £127.50 @ Pricelover.. going down
    X5670 B1 @175x24=4.2GHz @1.24v LLC on
    Rampage III Extreme Bios 0003
    G.skill Eco @1600 (7-7-7-20 1T) @1.4v
    EVGA GTX 580 1.5GB
    Auzen X-FI Prelude
    Seasonic X-650 PSU
    Intel X25-E SLC RAID 0
    Samsung F3 1TB
    Corsair H70 with dual 1600 rpm fan
    Corsair 800D
    3008WFP A00



  7. #7
    RAIDer
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    699
    Quote Originally Posted by Metroid View Post
    Intel drives are great for reliability, nobody that I know had any problems with them. It's a great price reduction.

    I always see somebody complaining about the Sandforce or Crucial drives.

    Greater Performance + Problems = Sandforce or Crucial.
    Was it not THIS forum that failed from raid-5 with Intel ssd? 2 drives failed, and 14 days lost and no backup?

    Only noobs have problems with Crucial c300

  8. #8
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,597
    As far as I can see there have been very few problems with the C300 following the firmware update. I used a C300 for my nephew's build and even he has not been able to mess it up Not yet anyways. (Touch wood, cos I will get the job of sorting it out).
    Last edited by Ao1; 10-27-2010 at 08:52 AM.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    yea walk a big circle around SF though.....that one only gets uglier from the day you plug it in.
    uh yea intel G3 FTW....lets talk steady state performance fellas.
    im buying eight of them on launch day.
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  10. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Prestonsburg, KY
    Posts
    545
    Quote Originally Posted by Computurd View Post
    yea walk a big circle around SF though.....that one only gets uglier from the day you plug it in.
    uh yea intel G3 FTW....lets talk steady state performance fellas.
    im buying eight of them on launch day.
    Eight? Making a run at PCMV I see?


  11. #11
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    of course!

    might throw in a mythical 990X ifn they ever come out and go for first
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    701
    People who buy 8 drives the day they launch are insane.
    slowpoke:
    mm ascension
    gigabyte x58a-ud7
    980x@4.4ghz (29x152) 1.392 vcore 24/7
    corsair dominator gt 6gb 1824mhz 7-7-7-19
    2xEVGA GTX TITAN
    os: Crucial C300 256GB 3R0 on Intel ICH10R
    storage: samsung 2tb f3
    cooling:
    loop1: mcp350>pa120.4>ek supreme hf
    loop2: mcp355>2xpa120.3>>ek nb/sb
    22x scythe s-flex "F"

  13. #13
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    ROFL! i seem to recall this one guy and his 8 uber c300.....
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,820
    Quote Originally Posted by Metroid View Post
    Intel drives are great for reliability, nobody that I know had any problems with them.
    Khm.... two of X25-E crapped on me (out of 4). One would not read a sector in the middle, the other would not read one of the first sectors.. (essentially the second one was useless, as everything that would get the data back would read the first few sectors always ).
    I think a few others had similar problems. Nothing on the scale of other SSDs though.

    As far as X25 prices go, I think it has more to do with the weaker USD$ than anything else (it takes time for Intel SSDs to pick up on the currency changes!)
    P5E64_Evo/QX9650, 4x X25-E SSD - gimme speed..
    Quote Originally Posted by MR_SmartAss View Post
    Lately there has been a lot of BS(Dave_Graham where are you?)

  15. #15
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Prestonsburg, KY
    Posts
    545
    Quote Originally Posted by Computurd View Post
    of course!

    might throw in a mythical 990X ifn they ever come out and go for first
    Hmm and you still don't run with your SS yet huh? Might as well start shopping the bay for a deal on a dewar. Actually with where you live you should be able to find one cheaper off a farm locally.


  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dorset, UK
    Posts
    439
    Quote Originally Posted by alfaunits View Post
    As far as X25 prices go, I think it has more to do with the weaker USD$ than anything else (it takes time for Intel SSDs to pick up on the currency changes!)
    I don't think so. There haven't been drops on the X25-V or the 160Gb M. At the old price the 80Gb M was competing with the new 80GB Corsair Force and a bunch of 120Gb older drives. Now it's priced perfectly below those. This has to be a marketing move on this drive and maybe I was wrong about this just being G3-related.

    The X25-V still can't be beaten on price for a solid XP-sized boot drive, there's no benefit to Intel to cut that price yet. I'm gonna keep buying them for my school builds without a doubt, but at only 70% more for double the space (and double the write speed) the M now dominates the sweet spot for Win 7 or unusually large XP working environments where people always complain that a small boot drive isn't big enough. And if that isn't enough, we know how well these RAID and that's a lot more affordable now.

    It just makes me even more curious about the G3 launch. Big price cut per GB at the low end? Or mostly just larger sized drives at a more reasonable price? Or both? February can't come soon enough...
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Software patents are mostly fail wrapped in fail sprinkled with fail and sautéed in a light fail sauce.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    Quote Originally Posted by alfaunits View Post
    ...
    One problem and that is likely a bad batch, reason 2 drives had the same problem.

    As for the others, take a look on OCZ, Crucial and Corsair forums and you will understand. Firmware issues, ghost drives, compromised reliability, bad sectors and the list goes on.

  18. #18
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    I don't think G3 will be dramatically faster than G2, if much at all. Look for increased capacity and lower costs.

    I just purchased a 120GB OCZ Vertex 2. It had a $30 MIR and is a great drive. The Intel drives are too far off for this customer to wait and the Intel 80GB was going to be too small for them (however I use one and have no issues with its size). The 160GB G2 was simply way over budget. The Vertex 2 actually had the lowest $/GB.

    In day to day use, one cannot tell the difference between them. No one could guess which drive was in which computer unless they saw the capacity.
    Last edited by Soulburner; 10-28-2010 at 08:27 AM.
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

  19. #19
    V3 Xeons coming soon!
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    36,363
    Quote Originally Posted by Computurd View Post
    of course!

    might throw in a mythical 990X ifn they ever come out and go for first
    They ain't mythical..
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    The XS WCG team needs your support.
    A good project with good goals.
    Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frisch View Post
    If you have lost faith in humanity, then hold a newborn in your hands.

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    328
    My X25-M 80GB G2 died after 5 months, at july.
    With 100% refund, I bought a Crucial C300 128GB at september, more fast and 45GB bigger
    Last edited by Gilgamesh; 10-28-2010 at 01:42 PM.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    Hmm and you still don't run with your SS yet huh?
    yeah unfortunatley all of my research points to a vapochill not being able to hold a 920....very sad it was an impulse buy off ebay, but for the price i got it for it wasnt too bad. used it on a q9550 and it held that fine, but everyone says a i7 will start it on fire

    dunno what to do with it. sold the q9550 now the phase looks sad...
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  22. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    78
    Quote Originally Posted by Nizzen View Post
    Was it not THIS forum that failed from raid-5 with Intel ssd? 2 drives failed, and 14 days lost and no backup?

    Only noobs have problems with Crucial c300
    Seconded.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •