Page 17 of 42 FirstFirst ... 71415161718192027 ... LastLast
Results 401 to 425 of 1028

Thread: AMD Radeon HD 6870 and HD 6850 confirmed to be launched on 22.10.2010

  1. #401
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    Quote Originally Posted by Hey Zeus View Post
    Not sure why exactly i should buy one then other then curiosity.

    Is there any ETA on the 475 or 495? I've been out of the loop
    i heard nothing till h1 for NV other than some low end crap like the 108
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  2. #402
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toon
    Posts
    1,570
    Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.67GHz
    ASUS 6T Deluxe
    Powercolor 7970 @ 1050/1475
    12GB GSkill Ripjaws
    Antec 850W TruePower Quattro
    50" Full HD PDP
    Red Cosmos 1000

  3. #403
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia / Europe
    Posts
    1,310
    that looks like an awesome piece of photoshop work
    edit (which fails when you notice the vertical lines of different shades of white background...)

  4. #404
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    660
    That is one good looking FAKE!!!
    An unfortunate person is one tries to fart but sh1ts instead...

    My Water Cooling Case Build (closed)

  5. #405
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    425
    Quote Originally Posted by kuroikenshi View Post
    that looks like an awesome piece of photoshop work
    edit (which fails when you notice the vertical lines of different shades of white background...)
    i'm sorry but it's not even a good photoshop :p
    Core i7 2700k@4,8ghz HT off- 1.41v / Gainward GTX580 GooD 850/1700/2200 / 2X4Gb G.Skill Ares 1833C9 / Z77 Sabertooth / Crucial M4 64 Gb / WD 320Gb and 640GB / Corsair H80 / Corsair 620 HX

  6. #406
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,247
    Quote Originally Posted by initialised View Post
    that's definately a fake. just look at the pattern of the gpus. both gpus have exactly the same shading and texture.

    makes me wonder why these people don't put more effort in modifying copied parts - it always seems like as if they want people to see it's a fake especially since everything else in this fake was done pretty well.
    1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile


    2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W

  7. #407
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Posts
    1,553
    lol there are no vmods on that Homoshop

    next...
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
    Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
    i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
    Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
    Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb

  8. #408
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601


    Dirt II 1920X1200 AA8 AF16
    960= 6850
    1120=6870

    VR-Zone

  9. #409
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ROMANIA
    Posts
    687
    The numbers for GTX 460 768MB and 1GB are very wrong....
    Last edited by xdan; 10-18-2010 at 06:07 AM.
    i5 2500K@ 4.5Ghz
    Asrock P67 PRO3


    P55 PRO & i5 750
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966385
    239 BCKL validation on cold air
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966536
    Almost 5hgz , air.

  10. #410
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    201
    http://www.guru3d.com/article/ecs-ge...lack-review/12

    Guru3D got 53 FPS for the 1GB and 46 FPS for the 768MB.

    Settings:
    Baja Iron Route 1
    8x Anti-Aliasing
    16x Anisotropic Filtering
    All settings maxed out

    I never played Dirt 2, but is there anymore demanding levels then this?

  11. #411
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    You're right pals ! Numberz doesn't seem accurate concerning GTX 460

  12. #412
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by xBanzai89 View Post
    http://www.guru3d.com/article/ecs-ge...lack-review/12

    Guru3D got 53 FPS for the 1GB and 46 FPS for the 768MB.

    Settings:
    Baja Iron Route 1
    8x Anti-Aliasing
    16x Anisotropic Filtering
    All settings maxed out

    I never played Dirt 2, but is there anymore demanding levels then this?
    not to sound dumb. but is it possible they forgot to turn on dx11 in that test guru3d?
    the bottom chart which has 5000 series cards shows the 5850 just ahead of all 460s, which i though would have demolished it with tessellation on

    heres from TPU which DOES NOT have dx11 enabled


    notice that in this with 4x AA vs 8x,
    the 5850 is 77fps vs that one being 64
    and the 460s are 58-61 vs 46-62 (alot of cards compared in the guru3d article)

    im under the impression guru3d did not turn on dx11 settings. otherwise it somehow seems like it was "free"
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

  13. #413
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ROMANIA
    Posts
    687
    Palit Sonic Platinium GTX 460(800/4000) scores 61 FPS .
    We will see but Ati can do that much magic, i mean you think that a 960SP card will equal an 1440SP( 6850= 5850? ) , and 1120SP = > 1600SP( 5870) ?
    I don't think so.
    I think that 6850 performance will be between GTX 460 768MB an 1GB closer to 1gb version( between 5830 an 5850), and 6870 will be above GTX 460 1GB an slightly above 5850 more or less, so between 5850 and 5870.
    i5 2500K@ 4.5Ghz
    Asrock P67 PRO3


    P55 PRO & i5 750
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966385
    239 BCKL validation on cold air
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966536
    Almost 5hgz , air.

  14. #414
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    1900X1200 DX9 and DX11 :


  15. #415
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    836
    So DiRT2 has SLI issues? GTX 295 loses to HD 4890?

    Ryzen 3800X @ 4.4Ghz
    MSI X570 Unify
    32GB G.Skill 3600Mhz CL14
    Sapphire Nitro Vega 64
    OCZ Gold 850W ZX Series
    Thermaltake LV10

  16. #416
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ROMANIA
    Posts
    687
    Anyway, the drivers from GTX 460 launch reviews were 258.90, than was 260.63 added some more performance and today Nvidia launched another driver 260.89(WHQL this time), probably because of 6850/6870 launch....
    http://www.nvidia.com/object/win7-wi...ql-driver.html
    Version: 260.89 WHQL
    Release Date: 2010.10.18

    GeForce GTX 460:
    Up to 19% in StarCraft II (SLI – 1920x1200 4xAA/16xAF Ultra)
    Up to 15% in Battlefield Bad Company 2 (SLI – 2560x1600 4xAA/16xAF)
    Up to 12% in S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat (2560x1600 noAA)
    Up to 9% in Aliens vs. Predator (1680x1050 4xAA/16xAF – Tessellation on)
    Up to 7% in Metro 2033 (1680x1050 noAA – Tessellation on)
    Up to 11% in Dirt 2 (SLI – 2560x1600 4xAA/16xAF)
    Up to 12% in Crysis:Warhead (SLI – 1920x1200 4xAA/16xAF Gamer)
    Up to 13% in Far Cry 2 (2560x1600 4xAA/16xAF)
    Up to 12% in H.A.W.X (SLI – 1920x1200 4xAA/16xAF SSAO Very High)
    Up to 5% in Just Cause 2 (1920x1200 4xAA/16xAF)
    Up to 22% in Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena (1920x1200 noAA)
    Up to 5% in 3DMark Vantage (Extreme Preset)
    i5 2500K@ 4.5Ghz
    Asrock P67 PRO3


    P55 PRO & i5 750
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966385
    239 BCKL validation on cold air
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966536
    Almost 5hgz , air.

  17. #417
    Banned Movieman...
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    1,809
    Quote Originally Posted by kuroikenshi View Post
    that looks like an awesome piece of photoshop work
    edit (which fails when you notice the vertical lines of different shades of white background...)
    count the odd number of memory chips

  18. #418
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
    1900X1200 DX9 and DX11 :

    [image removed]
    wow thats interesting chart

    5850 went from 63fps to 55 (highest settings before/after dx11)
    460 1GB was 81 to 55

    thats a massive drop. and i thought the opposite would have been true
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

  19. #419
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    960
    To all Quoted: If the reviews aren't using the same CPU... it's not apples vs apples.

    Quote Originally Posted by xdan View Post
    The numbers for GTX 460 768MB and 1GB are very wrong....
    Quote Originally Posted by xBanzai89 View Post
    Guru3D got 53 FPS for the 1GB and 46 FPS for the 768MB.
    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
    You're right pals ! Numberz doesn't seem accurate concerning GTX 460

  20. #420
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Quote Originally Posted by Piotrsama View Post
    To all Quoted: If the reviews aren't using the same CPU... it's not apples vs apples.
    Intel Core i7-975XE (HT & Turbo Off)
    DFI LanParty DK X58-T3eH6 (bios 422)
    G.Skill F3-16000CL9T-6GBTD 3 x 2 Go @DDR3-1333 (6/6/6/18)
    Western Digital Raptor 150 Go (OS) / Samsung F1 500 Go (Jeux)
    Samsung SH-D163B
    Corsair TX-750W
    LeComptoir

  21. #421
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Evje, Norway
    Posts
    3,419
    Whats your point?

    Guru3d used Core i7 965 @ 3750 MHz
    and we dont know whats used in the 6870/6850 vs GTX460...
    Quote Originally Posted by iddqd View Post
    Not to be outdone by rival ATi, nVidia's going to offer its own drivers on EA Download Manager.
    X2 555 @ B55 @ 4050 1.4v, NB @ 2700 1.35v Fuzion V1
    Gigabyte 890gpa-ud3h v2.1
    HD6950 2GB swiftech MCW60 @ 1000mhz, 1.168v 1515mhz memory
    Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB 1866 cas 9 @ 1800 8.9.8.27.41 1T 110ns 1.605v
    C300 64GB, 2X Seagate barracuda green LP 2TB, Essence STX, Zalman ZM750-HP
    DDC 3.2/petras, PA120.3 ek-res400, Stackers STC-01,
    Dell U2412m, G110, G9x, Razer Scarab

  22. #422
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Quote Originally Posted by eXa View Post
    Whats your point?

    Guru3d used Core i7 965 @ 3750 MHz
    and we dont know whats used in the 6870/6850 vs GTX460...
    Try to find if results are possible or not ... Nothing more
    Last edited by Olivon; 10-18-2010 at 07:23 AM.

  23. #423
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    I don't see how that card can preform better, with the same amount of tessellation units as 5870 or perhaps a bigger one ?
    where's the heaven 2.1 benchmarks ? lol
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  24. #424
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Four crossfire connectors and 17 memory ICs? That's not even a very good photoshop.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  25. #425
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    90% of the Dirt 2 numbers I have seen in reviews seem to be incorrect due to the use of the early stand-alone Dirt 2 benchmark, improper implementation of forced DX11 or using an old version of the game engine (patches have increased performance quite a bit).

Page 17 of 42 FirstFirst ... 71415161718192027 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •