Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 39 of 39

Thread: ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme review and AMD WR as bonus!!!

  1. 09-27-2010, 07:44 AM #26
    DosDuoNo
    DosDuoNo is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Face Clinic, Harley Street
    Posts
    282
    Quote Originally Posted by OC Maximus View Post
    need more coffee..........
    me too this brown nosing is killing me
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 09-27-2010, 07:48 AM #27
    chew*
    chew* is offline
    Brilliant Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    11,015
    It's not a big deal if he runs it again he will hit around 9.700 get record and call it a day.

    Like i said great result regardless he will have record at those speeds
    heatware chew*
    I've got no strings to hold me down.
    To make me fret, or make me frown.
    I had strings but now I'm free.
    There are no strings on me
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 09-27-2010, 07:51 AM #28
    crazydiamond
    crazydiamond is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    milwaukee
    Posts
    1,683
    pretty amazing runs there maybe even be able to squeeze out a few extra mhz if he disables 2 cores like i have seen others do
    LEO!!!!
    amd phenom II x6 1100T | gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 . .
    2x2gb g.skill 2133c8 | 128gb g.skill falcon ssd
    sapphire ati 5850 | x-fi xtrememusic. . .
    samsung f4 2tb | samsung dvdrw . .
    corsair tx850w | windows 7 64-bit.
    ddc3.25 xspc restop | ek ltx | mc-tdx | BIP . .
    lycosa-g9-z2300 | 26" 1920x1200 lcd .
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 09-27-2010, 08:28 AM #29
    FlanK3r
    FlanK3r is offline
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    Send a message via ICQ to FlanK3r
    next will validation too (7GHz+ think easy)
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 09-27-2010, 08:45 AM #30
    Mad222
    Mad222 is offline
    Champion
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    550
    Hey, Flankerp...he must be a great AMD Overclocker
    Nice to see new WRs
    Frankly, I would say 6.9GHz @ 9.3s is an unrealistic no. even with tweaks which may not make a very big diff.

    Anyway, congrats to OBR & hope to see more AMD WRs from him soon !
    A qualified amateur has been poisoned by LN2 & soon be killed
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 09-27-2010, 08:56 AM #31
    chew*
    chew* is offline
    Brilliant Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    11,015
    Quote Originally Posted by Mad222 View Post
    Frankly, I would say 6.9GHz @ 9.3s is an unrealistic no. even with tweaks which may not make a very big diff.
    Be carefull madd, stating the obvious apparently nowadays makes you a troll or jealous
    heatware chew*
    I've got no strings to hold me down.
    To make me fret, or make me frown.
    I had strings but now I'm free.
    There are no strings on me
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 09-27-2010, 10:44 AM #32
    TheKarmakazi
    TheKarmakazi is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    1,609
    yeah watch out guys DosDuoNo is hungry, dont feed the troll!

    And as has already been stated that 1M is def bugged. Cant wait for a rerun and a valid WR! Great clockin silicon u got there
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 09-27-2010, 10:57 AM #33
    cartago2202
    cartago2202 is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    189
    very nice
    Cartago´s Review on Facebook
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 09-27-2010, 11:03 AM #34
    sofos1990
    sofos1990 is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Athens - Hellas
    Posts
    739
    Send a message via MSN to sofos1990
    Solid performance there
    Keep pushing it
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 09-27-2010, 11:13 AM #35
    hiwa
    hiwa is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,609
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian y. View Post
    very nice clocks...

    that was done using Windows 7?
    Brian-Y it's 7 64bit

    lol mr trackball u got it
    Quote Originally Posted by LardArse View Post
    i think you are asking the wrong person about safety limits, but
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 09-27-2010, 11:50 AM #36
    [XC] Oj101
    [XC] Oj101 is offline
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    I don't think anyone has ever run SuperPi at that frequency... When at that speed I think it's safe to say anywhere remotely near that frequency, as once you get to that speed every MHz is more difficult that the last. I learned that when I hit 3.916GHz on my FX-55 and thought 4GHz would be a breeze

    I'm working on my 8th GHz now, the first seven failed
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 09-27-2010, 11:53 AM #37
    BeepBeep2
    BeepBeep2 is offline
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
    be carefull madd, stating the obvious apparently nowadays makes you a troll or jealous
    Smile
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 09-27-2010, 12:02 PM #38
    Zeus
    Zeus is offline
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    6,421
    Send a message via ICQ to Zeus
    chew* is right, this efficiency is simply impossible. Copy waza does very little for 1M, especially with the cache current cpu's have. Take it from a guy who has a fair share of experience with SuperPi 1M.
    Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z | FX 8350 | 2x4GB Trident-X 2600 C10 | 2x ATI HD5870 Crossfire | Enermax Revo 1050watt | OCZ Vertex 3 60GB | Samsung F1 1TB

    Watercooling: XSPC Raystorm | EK 5870 Delrin fullcover | TFC X-changer 480 w/ 4x Gentle Typhoon | DDC2+ Delrin top | EK 200mm res | Primochill LRT 3/8 tubing

    Case: Murdermodded TJ-07
    sub 9 sec. SPi1M 940BE 955BE 965BE 1090T
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 09-27-2010, 12:34 PM #39
    FlanK3r
    FlanK3r is offline
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    Send a message via ICQ to FlanK3r
    MAD+Chew: ok, hope, we will se "true" in next LN2 station...Maybe really it was some bug, god know it.
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules