I mean, for an unsuspecting customer it surely sounds like an upgrade going from GTS 250 to GTS 450. I hope reviewers will point out this branding madness from both vendors. I hear rumors that AMD will release Bart (which is the 2nd tier compared to Cayman) as 6870, and I would only consider that legit if its performance is significantly better than 5870. Otherwise, that would also be a shady naming tactic to confuse consumers. Reviewers should make things like these clear for consumers.
I don't check my PMs very often.
Even with the arq change 450 seems more like a rebranded 250. As a previous post said, a better name would've been 440 o 435.
450
128bit*3600Mhz GDDR5 / 8 --> 57.6GB/s
HD5750
128bit*4600Mhz GDDR5 / 8 --> 73.6GB/s
HD5770
128bit*4800Mhz GDDR5 / 8 --> 76.8GB/s
Last edited by Nintendork; 09-11-2010 at 11:58 AM.
Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
| Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"
Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)
Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
Reality check
I'd buy it, if it was under 100 bucks, for a physX replacement card.
Holy crap...
This chip is not that far off double the size of Juniper yet can't match a 5770's performance!
That is just ludicrous, not to worry though, atleast it's a whole new architecture.
Originally Posted by BSNJust when I thought their stock wouldn't get any lower, they go and release this, Nvidia should of just cancelled it, what were they thinking? what's the point in making a product that can't economically compete, this is a large volume part! If AMD squeeze this card into a loss making product it could cost Nv huge sums of cash with only slight negative margins.Originally Posted by BSN
Waste of R&D resources and silicon IMHO.
Edit:
Forgot to add the link...
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news...-revealed.aspx
Last edited by Ejizz; 09-11-2010 at 03:44 PM.
The reason this isn't more of an upgrade over the gts 250 I can imagine is drivers. The gts 250 driver are as wrung out for performance as you can get. I think if the gts 450 drivers were as mature, I think you could expect 10% more performance because during the gts 250 lifetime, the drivers have had multiple big jumps such as when big bang II drivers were released.
But still this card should be performing better than it is, especially considering the die size. The biggest flaw in the gf1xx architecture it appears is that the shader clock is not at a higher ratio than 1:2. 1:2.5 would have done wonders for this architecture.
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
Last edited by kaktus1907; 09-12-2010 at 07:21 AM.
Man from Atlantis(B3D, DH, S|A, 3DC, OCN), MfA(G3D, CH), kaktus1907(XS,TPU,AT) and zennino
SIS 6326 > Ti 4200 > 9800XT > 9800GT > GTX 460
Celeron 366 > Celeron 1700 > Athlon XP 2500+ > E6300 > Q9650
Alice Madness Returns | Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood | Assassin's Creed: Revelations | Batman Arkham City | Battlefield 3 | Bulletstorm | Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 | Crysis 2 | Darkness II | Darksiders | Dead Island | Dead Space | Dead Space 2 | Deus Ex: Human Revolution | Dragon Age Origins | Dragon Age 2 | F.3.A.R. | F1 2011 | Half Life 2 | Hard Reset | Kane & Lynch 2 | L.A. Noire | LEGO: Pirates of the Caribbean | LEGO: Star Wars III: The Clone Wars | LOTR: War in the North | Mass Effect | Mass Effect 2 | Mass Effect 3 | Mini Ninjas | NFS Hot Pursuit | RAGE | Renegade Ops | Skyrim | The Witcher 2 | Tomb Raider: Underworld | Transformers: WFC | Trine 2
260.52 driver version shows really good gains in this review. We will see more tomorrow.
Anyway, thanks for sharing Man from Atlantis
Nice improvement from the earlier leaks. So it can give an HD 5770 a run for it's money after all.
So an overclocked version is about even with a 5770, performance per dollar seems ok, but it uses something like 50% more power than a 5770? (65W under load). Not very efficient IMO.
Obsolescence be thy name
I'm pretty sure it is. Maybe not this exact model, but it seems some OC versions cost the same as the regular thing.
very odd that the power consumption graph shows gts 450 == gtx 460.
the average price for both gts 450 and 5750 appears to be around $135 on newegg. the average 5770 price is maybe 10-20 bucks more.
Last edited by kaktus1907; 09-12-2010 at 08:03 AM.
Man from Atlantis(B3D, DH, S|A, 3DC, OCN), MfA(G3D, CH), kaktus1907(XS,TPU,AT) and zennino
SIS 6326 > Ti 4200 > 9800XT > 9800GT > GTX 460
Celeron 366 > Celeron 1700 > Athlon XP 2500+ > E6300 > Q9650
Alice Madness Returns | Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood | Assassin's Creed: Revelations | Batman Arkham City | Battlefield 3 | Bulletstorm | Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 | Crysis 2 | Darkness II | Darksiders | Dead Island | Dead Space | Dead Space 2 | Deus Ex: Human Revolution | Dragon Age Origins | Dragon Age 2 | F.3.A.R. | F1 2011 | Half Life 2 | Hard Reset | Kane & Lynch 2 | L.A. Noire | LEGO: Pirates of the Caribbean | LEGO: Star Wars III: The Clone Wars | LOTR: War in the North | Mass Effect | Mass Effect 2 | Mass Effect 3 | Mini Ninjas | NFS Hot Pursuit | RAGE | Renegade Ops | Skyrim | The Witcher 2 | Tomb Raider: Underworld | Transformers: WFC | Trine 2
E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
Intel's atom is a terrible chip.
They are benching a OC EDITION 450 against a SILENT EDITION 5770 regarding performance. Lol really?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Bookmarks