Have 3dmarks scores from a card ever been leaked this early?
Have 3dmarks scores from a card ever been leaked this early?
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
~2 months? Yes.
Originally Posted by motown_steve
Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.
Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.
Fake scores have always been leaked early...
6.4ghz Gddr5.....
a while ago people said there was a memory bandwidth limitation on ati cards
Last edited by demonkevy666; 08-27-2010 at 07:07 AM.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.p...postcount=1434
ATIRadeonX3000AMDCaymanHardware
ATIRadeonX3000AMDBartsHardware
ATIRadeonX3000AMDTurksHardware
ATIRadeonX3000AMDCaicosHardware
give link to original ok? http://netkas.org/?p=539
jesus christ... thats almost double the gddr5 clock of a 460
and almost double the vantage X score too...
so maybe thats why nvidia didnt launch a 490?
cause ati will be able to beat that with a single gpu card within a few weeks?
looks like there will be a red 460 soon... i wonder how much itll cost...
and damn... 12k vantage X with a single card, at stock!
just imagine quadfire with those cards... itll be ridiculously fast... i mean you could probably play on several 30" displays... in 3d... with everything maxed out...
Last edited by saaya; 08-29-2010 at 02:14 AM.
and a Unigine score from same source.
http://we.pcinlife.com/thread-1500103-1-1.html
Well tbh thats the "problem" there is no real reason to upgrade anymore as games are not demanding enough, we have enough GPU power now and cpu is the same really. Its only if you play in 25xx x 16xx or multidisplay that these new cards are worth upgrading to, I dont get why I bought a HD5870 in the first place, I could play all my lousy RTS games on my 8800GTS 512 anyway :s
Ps: I hate my inner upgrade junkie!
Pps: selling my computer now and getting a Thinkpad X201t and a ViDock like solution.
Desktop I5-3570k, 8GB Ram, GTX 560, Silverstone TJ08-E, Crucial M4 128GB, 750W Silver Power, ASUS P8Z77-M
Laptop ThinkPad W520 2720QM /2 x 4 GB ram / Quadro 1000M / Crucial M4 128GB + 500Gb Hdd / FHD Screen / Intel WiFi Link 6300 AGN WLAN / 9 Cell Battery
Laptop 2 New Macbook Pro Retina / i7 QuadCore / 650 GT / 16GB Ram / 512 GB SSD
Server: Athlon II X4 640, ASROCK K10N78, 8GB Ram, LSI MegaRaid 8 port, 64GB Vertex 1, 5 x 1 TB WD Raid6, 3 x 3TB Seagate Raid5
Just found a Unigine 2.1 test with GTX 480/5870.
http://www.geeks3d.com/20100525/quic...-tessellation/
Results:
EVGA GTX 480 Scores
GTX 480 clocks – GPU:700MHz, memory:1848MHz and shader:1401MHz
OpenGL 4.0
Res: 1920×1080 fullscreen
Tessellation mode: Extreme
- Score: 916
- FPS = 36.4
- Min FPS = 6.1
- Max FPS = 89.4
Direct3D 11
Res: 1920×1080 fullscreen
Tessellation mode: Extreme
- Score: 970
- FPS = 38.5
- Min FPS = 17.6
- Max FPS = 95.5
GeForce GTX 470 Scores
GTX 470 clocks – GPU:607MHz, memory:1674MHz and shader:1215MHz
OpenGL 4.0
Res: 1920×1080 fullscreen
Tessellation mode: Extreme
- Score: 719
- FPS = 28.5
- Min FPS = 5.9
- Max FPS = 70.4
Direct3D 11
Res: 1920×1080 fullscreen
Tessellation mode: Extreme
- Score: 768
- FPS = 30.5
- Min FPS = 13.5
- Max FPS = 76.1
Radeon HD 5870 Scores
- HD 5870 clocks – GPU:850MHz and memory:1200MHz
- Drivers: Catalyst 10.4
OpenGL 4.0
Not supported yet.
Direct3D 11
Res: 1920×1080 fullscreen
Tessellation mode: Extreme
- Score: 531
- FPS = 21.1
- Min FPS = 6.5
- Max FPS = 74.4
It looks like Cayman will kick ass, since now is up to par with GTX 480 in DX11 but better in anything else, for a lot less TDP.
No AA?
http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=25391&page=6
1,920x1,080 with 4x AA and 16x AF
That's true, it had no AA, but couldn't find another one that fast :P. What is obvious is that with 4x AA and 16 AF, the future 6870 is faster than any other single GPU in Unigine, which is impressive for a refresh.
From S|A forum:
It is a bit bigger than Evergreen, and a hair bigger than GF104. I think it is in the 380mm^2 range, but I could be wrong there.
-Charlie
guys, we're going in circles here. could we keep the discussion in one thread instead of the same pics etc in 2 seperate ones? this would make keeping up with new posts a bit easier imo
what i mean are the coherencies between this thread and the "6870 benchmarked" one.
1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile
2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W
Impressive scores! Much faster than 480!
CPU: i7 930 3002A648 (Venomous X+Ultra Kaze 2000rpm)
MB: Asus P6X58D Premium Bios 1501
Video: Saphire HD 5970
Memory: Corsair Dominator TR3X6G1600C8D @ 1600MHz
X-Fi Extreme Gamer Fatality Pro
HDD: Vertex 2 100GB+WD Caviar Black 1Tb
Case: TT Kandalf LCS Silver
Power: CM Real Power Pro 1000W
Display: Samsung 275T
Input: Logitech G25/G15/G500/Z-2300
Damn, seeing these results I really regret purchasing a 460 1Gb. Should have waited just a little longer
CPU: i7 930 3002A648 (Venomous X+Ultra Kaze 2000rpm)
MB: Asus P6X58D Premium Bios 1501
Video: Saphire HD 5970
Memory: Corsair Dominator TR3X6G1600C8D @ 1600MHz
X-Fi Extreme Gamer Fatality Pro
HDD: Vertex 2 100GB+WD Caviar Black 1Tb
Case: TT Kandalf LCS Silver
Power: CM Real Power Pro 1000W
Display: Samsung 275T
Input: Logitech G25/G15/G500/Z-2300
I also think that the benchmark thread and this could be merged.
HD 6xxx series especially that HD 6870 looking to shape up very well, like better than most people's expectations I bet taking into account this refresh 40nm had rather uncertain existance for starters and been on quite tight schedule with not much room for improvements. I do believe in these benchmarks not being fake, cuz somehow every rumors handed out so far, pricing, specs, performance seems to go rather hand-in-hand and by logic it was almost certain ATI/AMD would aim to make 6870 slightly faster (OK I personally think it looks a bit more than "slightly" so far) than GTX 480 and the full 512 SP variant to make life even more difficult (read lose market share). But everytime things don't go as well as you planned but looks like HD 6xxx development have went VERY smooth (again not suprising as it's still 40nm which they master by now and this isn't a drastic change from previous series). Would really be interesting to hear an interview with the person in charge of HD 6xxx development.
Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 08-29-2010 at 05:30 AM.
Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs
If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/video/d...s_Sources.html
No more ATI brand in 6xxx said by xbit labs ...
I'm going to ROFLMAO if these benchmarks turn out to be fake
They seem too good to be true, and you know what they say about being too good to be true... Fake benchmarks always circulate before a new card is released.. You guys should know that by now, so don't put all of your eggs in one basket eh?
And correct me if I'm mistaken, but memory overclocking never had much of an impact on HD 5870 performance compared to overclocking the core..
So with that said, where does the assumption come from that the HD 5870 architecture is bandwidth limited?
Intel Core i7 6900K
Noctua NH-D15
Asus X99A II
32 GB G.Skill TridentZ @ 3400 CL15 CR1
NVidia Titan Xp
Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5
Sennheiser HD-598
Samsung 960 Pro 1TB
Western Digital Raptor 600GB
Asus 12x Blu-Ray Burner
Sony Optiarc 24x DVD Burner with NEC chipset
Antec HCP-1200w Power Supply
Viewsonic XG2703-GS
Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
Logitech G502 gaming mouse w/Razer Exact Mat
Logitech G910 mechanical gaming keyboard
Windows 8 x64 Pro
Bookmarks