Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 62

Thread: TessMark 0.2.2: New OpenGL 4 Tessellation Benchmark

  1. #26
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    217
    Quote Originally Posted by ElSel10 View Post
    I want to see 5870 vs GTX480!
    Just look above - the GTX480- OWNS- the HD5870 in Tesselation

  2. #27
    Xtreme Member Toysoldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Posts
    314
    Quote Originally Posted by tombman View Post
    Just look above - the GTX480- OWNS- the HD5870 in Tesselation
    This is indeed true. nVidia did a very good job on their dynamic tessellation configuration.

    So I thought it would be interesting to run Furmark and Tessmark at the same time to see what the result would be.

    Tessmark result with both tessmark and furmark running in a window




    Tessmark runs on top of furmark



    So my scores drop from 150 tessmarks running in a window to 51 with furmark running in the background.

    Settings used in Tessmark and Furmark :





    So it would be interesting to see what kind of performance GTX460/470/480 owners would get running furmark and tessmark.
    Last edited by Toysoldier; 08-22-2010 at 11:59 AM.
    AMD Phenom II 1100T ~ Noctua NH-D14
    GeForce GTX 680 ~ 301.25
    GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD5 ~ bios F6
    Zahlman ZM-1000HP PSU
    2 x 4 GB Mushkin Redline CL7 PC312800
    1 x Corsair CSSD-F120GB2
    1 x 1000 GB Samsung HD103SJ F3
    1 x 1000 GB WD Caviar Black WD1002FAEX
    Cooler Master CM 690 Case
    Creative X-FI XtremeGamer
    Logitech G19 keyboard
    Roccat Kone+ v2 Mouse
    Samsung Syncmaster 2493HM monitor

    Running Windows 7 Ultimate x64 OEM SP1

    Smartphone : Samsung Galaxy Nexus

  3. #28
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by Toysoldier View Post
    So it would be interesting to see what kind of performance GTX460/470/480 owners would get running furmark and tessmark.
    GTX 460 800/2000. Using settings from your screenshots.

    TessMark - 381 fps
    TessMark + FurMark - 124 fps

  4. #29
    Xtreme Member Toysoldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Posts
    314
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    GTX 460 800/2000. Using settings from your screenshots.

    TessMark - 381 fps
    TessMark + FurMark - 124 fps
    Thank You.
    So the performance drop seems to be about the same on both type of GPU's.
    AMD Phenom II 1100T ~ Noctua NH-D14
    GeForce GTX 680 ~ 301.25
    GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD5 ~ bios F6
    Zahlman ZM-1000HP PSU
    2 x 4 GB Mushkin Redline CL7 PC312800
    1 x Corsair CSSD-F120GB2
    1 x 1000 GB Samsung HD103SJ F3
    1 x 1000 GB WD Caviar Black WD1002FAEX
    Cooler Master CM 690 Case
    Creative X-FI XtremeGamer
    Logitech G19 keyboard
    Roccat Kone+ v2 Mouse
    Samsung Syncmaster 2493HM monitor

    Running Windows 7 Ultimate x64 OEM SP1

    Smartphone : Samsung Galaxy Nexus

  5. #30
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    535
    Charlie was right... err... I mean wrong!

  6. #31
    Xtreme Member Toysoldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Posts
    314
    Quote Originally Posted by hurleybird View Post
    Charlie was right... err... I mean wrong!
    ??????????
    AMD Phenom II 1100T ~ Noctua NH-D14
    GeForce GTX 680 ~ 301.25
    GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD5 ~ bios F6
    Zahlman ZM-1000HP PSU
    2 x 4 GB Mushkin Redline CL7 PC312800
    1 x Corsair CSSD-F120GB2
    1 x 1000 GB Samsung HD103SJ F3
    1 x 1000 GB WD Caviar Black WD1002FAEX
    Cooler Master CM 690 Case
    Creative X-FI XtremeGamer
    Logitech G19 keyboard
    Roccat Kone+ v2 Mouse
    Samsung Syncmaster 2493HM monitor

    Running Windows 7 Ultimate x64 OEM SP1

    Smartphone : Samsung Galaxy Nexus

  7. #32
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    535
    About Fermi only being great at tessellation when it has nothing else to do.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Mentor tbone8ty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West hartford, CT
    Posts
    2,761
    Quote Originally Posted by Toysoldier View Post
    This is indeed true. nVidia did a very good job on their dynamic tessellation configuration.

    So I thought it would be interesting to run Furmark and Tessmark at the same time to see what the result would be.

    Tessmark result with both tessmark and furmark running in a window


    Tessmark runs on top of furmark


    now that is Xtreme!
    FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
    Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
    G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
    MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
    OCZ ZX 850w psu
    Lian-Li Lancool K62
    Samsung 830 128g
    2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
    Win7 Home 64bit
    My Rig

  9. #34
    Registered User Arctucas's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    66
    Following everyone's lead; 1024x768(FS), AA-off, PostFX-off:







    GTX460 SLI

    EDIT: Yes, SLI was not working. I was told to use etqw.exe and it seems to have done the trick!
    Last edited by Arctucas; 08-31-2010 at 01:25 PM. Reason: Needed to use etqw instead of TessMark!

  10. #35
    Xtreme Enthusiast kaktus1907's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Istanbul
    Posts
    606
    ^ seems SLI not working.. you can check my results at previous page..

  11. #36
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    34,647
    Quote Originally Posted by tombman View Post
    Just look above - the GTX480- OWNS- the HD5870 in Tesselation
    are you surprised?

    its just too bad there arent really any games using tesselation in a way it actually enhances iq...

  12. #37
    Xtreme Guru Johnny87au's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,428
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    are you surprised?

    its just too bad there arent really any games using tesselation in a way it actually enhances iq...
    lets just hope ATI step up their game with the new 6000 series..

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  13. #38
    Xtreme Member ElSel10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    435
    Quote Originally Posted by hurleybird View Post
    About Fermi only being great at tessellation when it has nothing else to do.
    Yes, a GTX460 scoring 120 with TessMark with FurMark in the background vs. a 5870 scoring only ~50 under the same configuration is a big victory for Charlie
    i7 920 D0 / Asus Rampage II Gene / PNY GTX480 / 3x 2GB Mushkin Redline DDR3 1600 / WD RE3 1TB / Corsair HX650 / Windows 7 64-bit

  14. #39
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    34,647
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny87au View Post
    lets just hope ATI step up their game with the new 6000 series..
    so they score higher in benchmarks and people slap their fanboy epeens around?

    wrong thinking! :P
    lets hope GAME DEVELOPERS STEP UP THEIR GAME WITH TESSELATION AND USE IT IN A WAY IT ACTUALLY MAKES IT WORTH IT TO GO DX11!!!!

  15. #40
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,068
    Quote Originally Posted by Arctucas View Post
    Following everyone's lead; 1024x768(FS), AA-off, PostFX-off:





    GTX460 SLI
    480 vs ^460sli^ @ same clocks

    normal runs hotter than insane



    Last edited by NapalmV5; 09-02-2010 at 11:25 PM.

  16. #41
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,068
    stock cooled @ 910/1820/2200




  17. #42
    Registered User Arctucas's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    66
    Tried to see how far I could go:

    Normal




    Extreme




    Insane




    Notice that the more intense the tessellation, the lower the clocks.

  18. #43
    Registered User Arctucas's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    66
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmV5 View Post
    stock cooled @ 910/1820/2200



    I wonder how much effect the difference between your Quad @ 4500 vs. my Dual @ 3200 makes?

  19. #44
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,068


    Last edited by NapalmV5; 11-20-2010 at 10:32 AM.

  20. #45
    Xtreme Addict Dimitriman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rio de Janeiro
    Posts
    1,527
    I see ONE person with custom drivers based off 10.7 running a benchmark which itself reports innoperable with most AMD high end configurations due to bugs and crashes. Also one claim that a 5770 is doing better than a 5870 for the same reasons above.
    I would wait for the problems to be ironed out before giving a overall opinion about this benchmark. So far all I can say is nice for having xp support, but kinda pointless if it only works as intended on nvidia so far.
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
    Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
    i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
    Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
    Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb

  21. #46
    Xtreme Member -=DVS=-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    241
    Most likely problem is ATI/AMD's inability to write good OpenGL drivers , looking back in history they always sucked in that area.
    And considering we don't have alot of new if any games in OpenGL , ATI might be keeping it a low low priority.
    .:. Obsidian 750D .:. i7 5960X .:. EVGA Titan .:. G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4 32GB .:. CORSAIR HX850i .:. Asus X99-DELUXE .:. Crucial M4 SSD 512GB .:.

  22. #47
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    787
    here's some 5970 results for you folks, all in 2560x1600 because I have a big screen:

    Also, some details about my setup... Everything is watercooled, running 10.10 catalysts, did a fresh re-install of win7 64bits 2 days ago, the 5970 is slightly overclocked 775/1075, it goes higher but I don't really care, the cpu is at 4.6ghz for 24/7 use but can boot upwards of 4.8 so I just need some phase change. I'm running a double monitor setup (2560x1600, 1920x1200) so perhaps this influences the benchmark results a bit.

    Moderate, no AA


    Normal, no AA


    Normal, 4x MSAA


    Normal, 8x MSAA


    Extreme, no AA


    Insane, no AA
    Last edited by antiacid; 11-20-2010 at 11:21 AM.

  23. #48
    Xtreme Addict Monkeywoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    above USA...below USSR
    Posts
    1,187






    from the looks of the Insane tess run, ati have to pull up their socks.
    Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
    MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
    Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
    Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
    CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
    RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
    Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
    300Gb of MUSICA!!


    Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
    http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/

  24. #49
    c[_] STEvil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    20,451
    Anyone got 6870 runs to compare to the 5870's? Dont know if tessmark will take advantage of the new method that 6870's have, but worth a try.
    Heatware || 01.01.08; AND 111.2%

    Dead Z7S-WS? Click!. || XS Z7S-WS Thread || Current Dead Asus Z7S-WS count: 26+ ($15,000 in dead motherboards).
    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
    Want to use my Anti-asus logo? Go ahead, but use this link please!: http://i853.photobucket.com/albums/a...sus/noasus.gif
    Bring back the game. http://reclaimyourgame.com/. EA are mean.

  25. #50
    Registered User cirons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    82
    Quote Originally Posted by STEvil View Post
    Anyone got 6870 runs to compare to the 5870's? Dont know if tessmark will take advantage of the new method that 6870's have, but worth a try.
    Everything at stock.

    Moderate:


    Normal:


    Extreme:


    Insane:


    *the links picasa was wanting me to use weren't working right let me know if you can see these.

    Edit: Just realized in my pics the memory was at 900 where the actual stock value is 1050, forgot i dropped that down i guess, the benchmark numbers the same on insane, +17 for extreme, +120 or so for Normal, +1040ish for Moderate.
    Last edited by cirons; 11-21-2010 at 01:13 PM. Reason: Just realized something
    cpu: AMD Phenom II 1090T
    motherboard: MSI 890FXA-GD70
    ram: A-DATA 4GB(2 x 2GB) DDR3 1333
    videocard: Sapphire Radeon HD6870
    powersupply: Silverstone DA1000 1000W

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •