Geforce GTX460: Overclocking and 3DMark results

[bamtan2]

I havent read the whole thread but if it can do about 900mhz with a voltage boost im not very impressed...
My Gtx 465 can do 875mhz on the gpu with a slight voltage increase and over that the stock cooler cant really handla the heat output...

Lets see on monday

you should be impressed by both because both overclock really well.

[kaktus1907]

GTX460/1024MB @900MHZ GPU @4452mhz Ram

[Olivon]

Nice ! That's between HD 5850 and HD 5870 but the score is with PhysX activated.

[alcachofa]

Seems the 1 Gb version will be on par with GTX 465, except it will have much better thermals and will need less power

[=SOC= Admiral]

Ok so we have the GF100 and GF104. Next up to bat are the GF106 and GF108.

[Snowman89]

Seems the 1 Gb version will be on par with GTX 465, except it will have much better thermals and will need less power

How is it possible for it to be on pair with the GTX 465?

[Picao84]

How is it possible for it to be on pair with the GTX 465?

Why not?

[Snowman89]

Why not?

Since from what i have seen the gtx 460 and 465 would overclock somewhat the same and the gtx 460 has less cuda cores. So why would the 460 be more effective clock per clock than the 465?

If we are talking stock gtx 460 against stock gtx 465. Yeah then they are probably going neck to neck.

[cowie]

How is it possible for it to be on pair with the GTX 465?

stock clocks of 675 up to 800 for factory oc cards might have something to do with it.

[Snowman89]

stock clocks of 675 up to 800 for factory oc cards might have something to do with it.

As i wrote in the post above you:

Since from what i have seen the gtx 460 and 465 would overclock somewhat the same and the gtx 460 has less cuda cores. So why would the 460 be more effective clock per clock than the 465?

If we are talking stock gtx 460 against stock gtx 465. Yeah then they are probably going neck to neck.

[GoldenTiger]

Since from what i have seen the gtx 460 and 465 would overclock somewhat the same and the gtx 460 has less cuda cores. So why would the 460 be more effective clock per clock than the 465?

If we are talking stock gtx 460 against stock gtx 465. Yeah then they are probably going neck to neck.

44 vs. 56 TMU's would help , I'd assume.

[Snowman89]

44 vs. 56 TMU's would help , I'd assume.

Oh so the 465 has 44 and 460 has 56? Will be fun to read reviews tomorrow and see how hot it gets also

[Picao84]

Oh so the 465 has 44 and 460 has 56? Will be fun to read reviews tomorrow and see how hot it gets also

According to leaked info, maxes at 81º at Furmark. On normal use, around 51º.

[Snowman89]

According to leaked info, maxes at 81º at Furmark. On normal use, around 51º.

Hmm okey. Well see when the reviews come. That info doesnt sound to good although.. The gtx 460 reviews said kinda the same. Although the review samples had 10 memory chips and 1.1v vpgu and my (all real 465?) had 0,9375v wich gave me 60C full load furmark.

[Neova]

I got 800 core / 1600 shaders and 3500 memory on a 465 with ~ 75 full load (weather is over 30 C here!) so would like to see how the 460 performs clock to clock. Doesn't anyone compare architecture efficiency anymore or just it out of the box and call it a day? The 460 looks really good and if the prices can be under 199, then 2 or 3 in sli would be a killer combo. But I did get the 465 for only 210 so might need to pickup a 2nd one before it all goes away.

[ElSel10]

Since from what i have seen the gtx 460 and 465 would overclock somewhat the same and the gtx 460 has less cuda cores. So why would the 460 be more effective clock per clock than the 465?

If we are talking stock gtx 460 against stock gtx 465. Yeah then they are probably going neck to neck.

The 460 has 56 TMUs, the 465 has 44.

And the stock 460 has more shader power than the stock 465.

336*1350 vs. 352*1215

In fact, the 1GB 460 should be faster across the board compared to the 465. It has more shader power, more memory bandwidth, more TMUs, and the same number of ROPs.

The 768mb version should trade blows. It has lower memory bandwidth, but more TMUs and more shader power.

[Luka_Aveiro]

The 460 has 56 TMUs, the 465 has 44.

And the stock 460 has more shader power than the stock 465.

336*1350 vs. 352*1215

In fact, the 1GB 460 should be faster across the board compared to the 465. It has more shader power, more memory bandwidth, more TMUs, and the same number of ROPs.

The 768mb version should trade blows. It has lower memory bandwidth, but more TMUs and more shader power.

It has fewer PolyMorph engines, however, right? And no L2.

[Picao84]

It has fewer PolyMorph engines, however, right? And no L2.

Wrong. It does have L2.

[Luka_Aveiro]

Wrong. It does have L2.

I'd love to see where you got that info from, please.

[-Sweeper_]

nvidia is killing the GTX480, you can get two GTX460s (factory OCed to 800/1000mhz) 1Gb in SLI for the same $$$

[-Sweeper_]

first review: http://www.expreview.com/11276-1.html

[Picao84]

I'd love to see where you got that info from, please.

From here:

[-Sweeper_]

nice card...

[Chickenfeed]

Quite respectable. Assuming availability and pricing stay in check, it should be a strong seller.

[cold2010]

MSI N460GTX CYCLONE 768D5 OC Edition




728/1800



3dmark vantage



800/2000







830/2060




830/2060@3DMARK Vantage





840/2100@3DMARK Vantage




www.coolaler.com