DirectX 11 Benchmark AVP

[Wrench]

http://segaeu.vo.llnwd.net/o37/alien...mark-v1.03.msi

The folks at AMD have let us know that Rebellion, SEGA and Twentieth Century FOX have just released the Aliens vs. Predator DirectX 11 Benchmark to the public.
About 303 meg download.

Source (Hardocp)

[BenchZowner]

Cheers!

[Chickenfeed]

Thanks for the heads up

Heres a run at default settings -

--------
Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 4139
Average Frame Time: 25.3ms
Average FPS: 39.5

--------

Its worth mentioning that texture quality defaults to medium and not high.

The results file outputs to your user/documents folder by default. The config can be changed in the install directory to alter video settings as well.

Note: Disregard this result as it was achieved with 1 run only. Additional runs resulted in much higher performance.

[Ghigo]

AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================

**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 23:55:35
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 5878
Average Frame Time: 17.8ms
Average FPS: 56.0

GTX 480 - 870/2150

[Circaflex]

AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================

**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 14:49:47
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 1280 x 1024
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 14106
Average Frame Time: 7.4ms
Average FPS: 134.6


Use command-line option '-logframetime' to report performance frame-by-frame.

Stock 920 and 5870's

[Wrench]

apparently ATI spank Nvida all around.

I have a quadro card so I wouldn't know.. I don't play many games anyway.

You guys should run a standard baseline res 1680X1050 (or something like that) to get a good picture of performance of the different hardware.

[=[PULSAR]=]

I think a parts list next to the benchmark would do some justice

[fellix_bg]

AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================

**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-27 @ 01:09:14
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 6823
Average Frame Time: 15.4ms
Average FPS: 65.0

Radeon HD 5870 1GB @ 900/1250 MHz

[ElSel10]

AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================

**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 17:11:22
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Video Settings from file <config.txt>:

Resolution: 1600 x 1200
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 4289
Average Frame Time: 24.4ms
Average FPS: 40.9

GTX480 @ 800/1600/3700 - 257.15 drivers

apparently ATI spank Nvida all around.

Err what? Make sure you pay attention to the settings used. Look at my results and compare with post #3

[=[PULSAR]=]

Where is the results file, ran the benchmark and can't find it?

[Loque]

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 11150
Average Frame Time: 9.4ms
Average FPS: 106.4

cpu at 3.6ghz or 4.2 gave me same fps average.. -_-

[Wrench]

Err what? Make sure you pay attention to the settings used. Look at my results and compare with post #3

http://www.hardocp.com/images/news/1...X6Tk_1_2_l.jpg


http://hardocp.com/news/2010/05/26/a..._now_available

[=[PULSAR]=]

AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================

**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 18:13:23
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 5278
Average Frame Time: 19.9ms
Average FPS: 50.3

i7 @ 4ghz GTX480 800/1600/2000

Was wondering why my score was lower

[ElSel10]

http://www.hardocp.com/images/news/1...X6Tk_1_2_l.jpg


http://hardocp.com/news/2010/05/26/a..._now_available

I don't care what some benchmark site got. My GTX480 got higher performance on this benchmark than another user's 5870 (who had his card overclocked by a larger amount than mine), and mine had higher settings to boot. Results from other users in this thread are painting the same picture as well.

[Wrench]

I don't care what some benchmark site got. My GTX480 got higher performance on this benchmark than another user's 5870 (who had his card overclocked by a larger amount than mine), and mine had higher settings to boot. Results from other users in this thread are painting the same picture as well.

Actually look at other posts.. Your not running the same baseline either.

[96redformula]

HTPC System as listed in Signature....




AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================

**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 16:36:39
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 4667
Average Frame Time: 22.5ms
Average FPS: 44.5

[ElSel10]

Actually look at other posts.. Your not running the same baseline either.

Sorry I don't know what you are smoking. The results are pretty clear. No, my baseline wasn't the same than the one in post #3. Mine has the graphics turned up even higher. If I used the same baseline, the performance would be even higher.

[SKYMTL]

apparently ATI spank Nvida all around.

Maybe in the benchmark but not in the game itself. The second AA is turned on, the NV cards surge to the front. Without AA, ATI dominates.

[annihilat0r]

The AMD slides say that the benches were done with 197 Forceware drivers. The 257's might have changed the situation.

[Wrench]

Maybe in the benchmark but not in the game itself. The second AA is turned on, the NV cards surge to the front. Without AA, ATI dominates.

Oops my fault.

I was looking at some wrong columns.


http://www.hardocp.com/images/news/1...6Tk_1_13_l.jpg

[=[PULSAR]=]

That chart is about 15fps off from my matching system, with a slight OC.

[Chumbucket843]

Oops my fault.

I was looking at some wrong columns.


http://www.hardocp.com/images/news/1...6Tk_1_13_l.jpg

you might want a better/more reliable source. for some reason AMD likes to put the 5000 series ahead of the 400 series.

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...review-13.html
this is the only site i could find that benched AVP.

[annihilat0r]

Guys, we are all running the bench at medium settings without AA. We should run with the command line -config=name_of_your_config.txt and create a config file.

My default results with a HD5970 at 850MHz and 19x12 for comparison:

Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 9188
Average Frame Time: 11.4ms
Average FPS: 87.7

[theystolemyname]

Stock 5870 using cat 10.4

Using Video Settings from file <config.txt>:

Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 3112
Average Frame Time: 33.7ms
Average FPS: 29.7

[NapalmV5]