DirectX 11 Benchmark AVP

[annihilat0r]

Oops my fault.

I was looking at some wrong columns.


http://www.hardocp.com/images/news/1...6Tk_1_13_l.jpg

Fermi's do great with AA. Without AA the 5970 is 1.7 times faster than the 480, with 4xAA and AF the number drops to 1.4.

[ElSel10]

Fermi's do great with AA. Without AA the 5970 is 1.7 times faster than the 480, with 4xAA and AF the number drops to 1.4.

1.7x faster? You mean 70% faster??

EDIT:
Oh, 5970. I thought you were talking about the 5870. That still seems kind of high though...

[annihilat0r]

Yeah, even 1.4x is higher than the usual percentage by which 5970 is faster than 480.

[tajoh111]

This is more a less a TWIWMTBP game but in AMD favour, just look at the hardocp article and it becomes obvious. The graphs and marketing tools should make it more obvious those.

[Olivon]

[H] reviews AMD slides ... Good ...

[SKYMTL]

This is more a less a TWIWMTBP game but in AMD favour, just look at the hardocp article and it becomes obvious. The graphs and marketing tools should make it more obvious those.

Yes and no. IMO, it's a lot like Far Cry 2 in terms of optimizations.

When AvP was first released, ATI cards walked all over it in DX9 and DX10 (no mention of DX11 simply NVIDIA had nothing to compare). However, both ATI and NV have been at the top of their games when it comes to optimizations for it. Just like FC2 was a TWIMTBP game that proved to be quite even performance-wise for both companies.

Also -and unlike FC2- the developers themselves have rolled out SIGNIFICANT performance improvements over their last few patches for both vendors' products.

As such, I think AvP is one of the more vendor-agnostic games out there right now regardless of ATI's support.

[Chickenfeed]

I ran the bench another 3 times after seeing Felix's 5870 results as my first result was much lower. Low and behold, the next 3 runs were magically higher

-------------------------

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 6901
Average Frame Time: 15.2ms
Average FPS: 65.8

------------

Did a few more runs with textures set to high and 4x AA ;

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Video Settings from file <avp.txt>:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 4095
Average Frame Time: 25.6ms
Average FPS: 39.0

---------

@ ElSel

Although you are running 1600x1200, 1680x1050 is still 88% the pixel count so the difference will be marginal. You shouldn't have put so much weight in my initial result, especially in light of Felix's result. Don't be so quick to jump to conclusions my friend

[justin.kerr]

hmm does not seem to be CPU limited... Scaling sux max of 67%...

[Carfax]

This benchmark is definitely pro AMD, because it seems to use crossfire but not SLI. I just ran the test at default settings, and I checked my GPU usage and there was only activity on one GPU (second GPU didn't use no more than 10%):

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 2560 x 1600
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 2760
Average Frame Time: 38.0ms
Average FPS: 26.3

Keep in mind my benchmark was at 2560x1600 without SLI.

[evoted]

man mine suck big time

AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================

**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 20:43:40
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 3380
Average Frame Time: 31.0ms
Average FPS: 32.2

[BobyTT]

Thats me

AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================

**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 22:32:34
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 4817
Average Frame Time: 21.8ms
Average FPS: 45.9


Use command-line option '-logframetime' to report performance frame-by-frame.

[LightSpeed]

[H] reviews AMD slides ... Good ...

They didnt review anything, just put it up on their front page news

Also, SLI does work in the actual game IIRC?

[japamd]

GUI time



Alien vs Predator Benchmark Tool


Edit: Links updated at 7/14

x86 Systems

x64 Systems

[japamd]

Nobody with DX9/DX10 results?

[RaZz!]

Nobody with DX9/DX10 results?

does this benchmark have a dx9 codepath as well? thought it'd be dx11 only - downloading now

*edit* ok, seems like it doesn't run with winxp cba to boot win7 now.

[Loque]

GUI time



Alien vs Predator Benchmark Tool

x86 Systems

x64 Systems

that was fast

thanks

[SKYMTL]

Nobody with DX9/DX10 results?

DX11 only and from where I am standing, not a very good representation of the actual in-game performance.

It's a shame too because we're sure to see AvP benchmarks using this tool to start popping up in numerous reviews due to its ease of use. Meanwhile, it doesn't give accurate results in relation to actual gameplay so hopefully sites will realize this and either use the game itself or not include AvP at all in their reviews.

[japamd]

does this benchmark have a dx9 codepath as well? thought it'd be dx11 only - downloading now

*edit* ok, seems like it doesn't run with winxp cba to boot win7 now.

Ooops, now you got me... maybe thats why nobody posted DX9/DX10 results?

I think it would be kinda stupid on dev side not supporting DX9/DX10 as well.

that was fast

thanks

RAD & OOP rules

[quattro_]

AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================

**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-27 @ 19:20:12
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 2560 x 1600
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 5927
Average Frame Time: 17.7ms
Average FPS: 56.6

980x @4 -- 2x 5870 stock

[Asmola]

5870 @ 1050/1275

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 6721
Average Frame Time: 15.6ms
Average FPS: 64.1

[PaganII]

1090T-stock/5870E6-stock

AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================

**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-27 @ 00:01:11
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 5908 x 1080
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 2687
Average Frame Time: 39.0ms
Average FPS: 25.6

[DosDuoNo]

man mine suck big time

AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================

**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 20:43:40
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 3380
Average Frame Time: 31.0ms
Average FPS: 32.2

your gona kick yourself here, im 10 FPS faster with same settings and card im more up with the 480 results

this is a GTX470 on default clocks

AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================

**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-27 @ 20:04:08
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 4807
Average Frame Time: 21.8ms
Average FPS: 45.8

[cold2010]

THIS TEST IN GAME





Try in Vain AMD

[evoted]

your gona kick yourself here, im 10 FPS faster with same settings and card im more up with the 480 results

this is a GTX470 on default clocks

AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================

**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-27 @ 20:04:08
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 4807
Average Frame Time: 21.8ms
Average FPS: 45.8

hey whats going here :P mine is a SC overclocked :S

[X.T.R.E.M.E_ICE]

where do you find the benchmark results?. Edit; I found it.

Cpu: i7 930 @ 4,00 Ghz
MoBO: Asus P6x58D Premium
Ram: 3 x 2GB
Vga: GTX480
OS: Win 7 X64

AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================

**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-28 @ 11:19:16
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Default Video Settings:

Resolution: 2048 x 1152
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 6021
Average Frame Time: 17.4ms
Average FPS: 57.4