Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 97

Thread: DirectX 11 Benchmark AVP

  1. 05-26-2010, 01:40 PM #1
    Wrench
    Wrench is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    243

    DirectX 11 Benchmark AVP

    http://segaeu.vo.llnwd.net/o37/alien...mark-v1.03.msi

    The folks at AMD have let us know that Rebellion, SEGA and Twentieth Century FOX have just released the Aliens vs. Predator DirectX 11 Benchmark to the public.
    About 303 meg download.

    Source (Hardocp)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 05-26-2010, 01:44 PM #2
    BenchZowner
    BenchZowner is offline
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Send a message via ICQ to BenchZowner Send a message via AIM to BenchZowner Send a message via MSN to BenchZowner Send a message via Skype™ to BenchZowner
    Cheers!
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 05-26-2010, 01:55 PM #3
    Chickenfeed
    Chickenfeed is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,264
    Thanks for the heads up

    Heres a run at default settings -

    --------
    Using Default Video Settings:

    Resolution: 1680 x 1050
    Texture Quality: 2
    Shadow Quality: 3
    Anisotropic Filtering: 16
    SSAO: ON
    Vertical Sync: OFF
    DX11 Tessellation: ON
    DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
    DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


    Benchmark Summary:

    Number of frames: 4139
    Average Frame Time: 25.3ms
    Average FPS: 39.5

    --------

    Its worth mentioning that texture quality defaults to medium and not high.

    The results file outputs to your user/documents folder by default. The config can be changed in the install directory to alter video settings as well.

    Note:     Disregard this result as it was achieved with 1 run only. Additional runs resulted in much higher performance.
    Last edited by Chickenfeed; 05-26-2010 at 05:14 PM.
    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 05-26-2010, 02:00 PM #4
    Ghigo
    Ghigo is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    122
    AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
    ==========================

    **************************************************
    * Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 23:55:35
    **************************************************
    * Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
    **************************************************

    *DX11 Hardware Detected*

    Using Default Video Settings:

    Resolution: 1920 x 1200
    Texture Quality: 2
    Shadow Quality: 3
    Anisotropic Filtering: 16
    SSAO: ON
    Vertical Sync: OFF
    DX11 Tessellation: ON
    DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
    DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


    Benchmark Summary:

    Number of frames: 5878
    Average Frame Time: 17.8ms
    Average FPS: 56.0

    GTX 480 - 870/2150
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 05-26-2010, 02:06 PM #5
    Circaflex
    Circaflex is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,218
    Send a message via AIM to Circaflex
    AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
    ==========================

    **************************************************
    * Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 14:49:47
    **************************************************
    * Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
    **************************************************

    *DX11 Hardware Detected*

    Using Default Video Settings:

    Resolution: 1280 x 1024
    Texture Quality: 2
    Shadow Quality: 3
    Anisotropic Filtering: 16
    SSAO: ON
    Vertical Sync: OFF
    DX11 Tessellation: ON
    DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
    DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


    Benchmark Summary:

    Number of frames: 14106
    Average Frame Time: 7.4ms
    Average FPS: 134.6


    Use command-line option '-logframetime' to report performance frame-by-frame.

    Stock 920 and 5870's
    i9-10900k@5.3ghz//MSI MEG z490 Unify//32GB Gskill TridentZ b.die@DDR4666//RTX 2080ti(+150/+700) kingpin bios//Samsung 970 Pro//Corsair AX1200i
    Custom Loop: Dual DDCs->Dual EK XE360 w/GT's -> HK IV CPU -> HK IV GPU ->EK X3 Res controlled by Aquaero 6
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 05-26-2010, 02:07 PM #6
    Wrench
    Wrench is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    243
    apparently ATI spank Nvida all around.

    I have a quadro card so I wouldn't know.. I don't play many games anyway.

    You guys should run a standard baseline res 1680X1050 (or something like that) to get a good picture of performance of the different hardware.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 05-26-2010, 02:07 PM #7
    =[PULSAR]=
    =[PULSAR]= is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    CT, USA!!!
    Posts
    2,821
    Send a message via ICQ to =[PULSAR]= Send a message via AIM to =[PULSAR]= Send a message via MSN to =[PULSAR]= Send a message via Skype™ to =[PULSAR]=
    I think a parts list next to the benchmark would do some justice
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 05-26-2010, 02:12 PM #8
    fellix_bg
    fellix_bg is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bulgaria, Varna
    Posts
    447
    Send a message via Skype™ to fellix_bg
    AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
    ==========================

    **************************************************
    * Report Created: 2010-05-27 @ 01:09:14
    **************************************************
    * Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
    **************************************************

    *DX11 Hardware Detected*

    Using Default Video Settings:

    Resolution: 1680 x 1050
    Texture Quality: 2
    Shadow Quality: 3
    Anisotropic Filtering: 16
    SSAO: ON
    Vertical Sync: OFF
    DX11 Tessellation: ON
    DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
    DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


    Benchmark Summary:

    Number of frames: 6823
    Average Frame Time: 15.4ms
    Average FPS: 65.0

    Radeon HD 5870 1GB @ 900/1250 MHz
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 05-26-2010, 02:15 PM #9
    ElSel10
    ElSel10 is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    435
    AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
    ==========================

    **************************************************
    * Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 17:11:22
    **************************************************
    * Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
    **************************************************

    *DX11 Hardware Detected*

    Using Video Settings from file <config.txt>:

    Resolution: 1600 x 1200
    Texture Quality: 3
    Shadow Quality: 3
    Anisotropic Filtering: 16
    SSAO: ON
    Vertical Sync: OFF
    DX11 Tessellation: ON
    DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
    DX11 MSAA Samples: 4


    Benchmark Summary:

    Number of frames: 4289
    Average Frame Time: 24.4ms
    Average FPS: 40.9

    GTX480 @ 800/1600/3700 - 257.15 drivers

    Quote Originally Posted by Wrench View Post
    apparently ATI spank Nvida all around.
    Err what? Make sure you pay attention to the settings used. Look at my results and compare with post #3
    i7 920 D0 / Asus Rampage II Gene / PNY GTX480 / 3x 2GB Mushkin Redline DDR3 1600 / WD RE3 1TB / Corsair HX650 / Windows 7 64-bit
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 05-26-2010, 02:19 PM #10
    =[PULSAR]=
    =[PULSAR]= is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    CT, USA!!!
    Posts
    2,821
    Send a message via ICQ to =[PULSAR]= Send a message via AIM to =[PULSAR]= Send a message via MSN to =[PULSAR]= Send a message via Skype™ to =[PULSAR]=
    Where is the results file, ran the benchmark and can't find it?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 05-26-2010, 02:21 PM #11
    Loque
    Loque is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    650
    *DX11 Hardware Detected*

    Using Default Video Settings:

    Resolution: 1680 x 1050
    Texture Quality: 2
    Shadow Quality: 3
    Anisotropic Filtering: 16
    SSAO: ON
    Vertical Sync: OFF
    DX11 Tessellation: ON
    DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
    DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


    Benchmark Summary:

    Number of frames: 11150
    Average Frame Time: 9.4ms
    Average FPS: 106.4

    cpu at 3.6ghz or 4.2 gave me same fps average.. -_-
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    TJ07BW | i7 980x | Asus RIII | 12Gb Corsair Dominator | 2xSapphire 7950 vapor-x | WD640Gb / SG1.5TB | Corsair HX1000W | 360mm TFC Rad + Swiftech GTZ + MCP655 | Dell U2711
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 05-26-2010, 02:21 PM #12
    Wrench
    Wrench is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    243
    Quote Originally Posted by ElSel10 View Post

    Err what? Make sure you pay attention to the settings used. Look at my results and compare with post #3


    http://www.hardocp.com/images/news/1...X6Tk_1_2_l.jpg


    http://hardocp.com/news/2010/05/26/a..._now_available
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 05-26-2010, 02:25 PM #13
    =[PULSAR]=
    =[PULSAR]= is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    CT, USA!!!
    Posts
    2,821
    Send a message via ICQ to =[PULSAR]= Send a message via AIM to =[PULSAR]= Send a message via MSN to =[PULSAR]= Send a message via Skype™ to =[PULSAR]=
    AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
    ==========================

    **************************************************
    * Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 18:13:23
    **************************************************
    * Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
    **************************************************

    *DX11 Hardware Detected*

    Using Default Video Settings:

    Resolution: 1920 x 1200
    Texture Quality: 2
    Shadow Quality: 3
    Anisotropic Filtering: 16
    SSAO: ON
    Vertical Sync: OFF
    DX11 Tessellation: ON
    DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
    DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


    Benchmark Summary:

    Number of frames: 5278
    Average Frame Time: 19.9ms
    Average FPS: 50.3

    i7 @ 4ghz GTX480 800/1600/2000

    Was wondering why my score was lower
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 05-26-2010, 02:34 PM #14
    ElSel10
    ElSel10 is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    435
    Quote Originally Posted by Wrench View Post
    http://www.hardocp.com/images/news/1...X6Tk_1_2_l.jpg


    http://hardocp.com/news/2010/05/26/a..._now_available
    I don't care what some benchmark site got. My GTX480 got higher performance on this benchmark than another user's 5870 (who had his card overclocked by a larger amount than mine), and mine had higher settings to boot. Results from other users in this thread are painting the same picture as well.
    i7 920 D0 / Asus Rampage II Gene / PNY GTX480 / 3x 2GB Mushkin Redline DDR3 1600 / WD RE3 1TB / Corsair HX650 / Windows 7 64-bit
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 05-26-2010, 02:38 PM #15
    Wrench
    Wrench is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    243
    Quote Originally Posted by ElSel10 View Post
    I don't care what some benchmark site got. My GTX480 got higher performance on this benchmark than another user's 5870 (who had his card overclocked by a larger amount than mine), and mine had higher settings to boot. Results from other users in this thread are painting the same picture as well.
    Actually look at other posts.. Your not running the same baseline either.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 05-26-2010, 02:39 PM #16
    96redformula
    96redformula is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    652
    HTPC System as listed in Signature....




    AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
    ==========================

    **************************************************
    * Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 16:36:39
    **************************************************
    * Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
    **************************************************

    *DX11 Hardware Detected*

    Using Default Video Settings:

    Resolution: 1920 x 1080
    Texture Quality: 2
    Shadow Quality: 3
    Anisotropic Filtering: 16
    SSAO: ON
    Vertical Sync: OFF
    DX11 Tessellation: ON
    DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
    DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


    Benchmark Summary:

    Number of frames: 4667
    Average Frame Time: 22.5ms
    Average FPS: 44.5
    HTPC - AMD Phenom II 555 Unlocked(4cores) - 4GB Gskill - AMD HD 5850 - Avermedia Duet - Harman Kardon avr247 - Surround Sound (Infinity Beta 50's, 10's, 360, and ed a2-300) - Samsung 46"

    Desktop Powerhouse PC - Gathering dust due to high usage of HTPC as general pc now
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 05-26-2010, 02:43 PM #17
    ElSel10
    ElSel10 is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    435
    Quote Originally Posted by Wrench View Post
    Actually look at other posts.. Your not running the same baseline either.
    Sorry I don't know what you are smoking. The results are pretty clear. No, my baseline wasn't the same than the one in post #3. Mine has the graphics turned up even higher. If I used the same baseline, the performance would be even higher.
    i7 920 D0 / Asus Rampage II Gene / PNY GTX480 / 3x 2GB Mushkin Redline DDR3 1600 / WD RE3 1TB / Corsair HX650 / Windows 7 64-bit
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 05-26-2010, 02:44 PM #18
    SKYMTL
    SKYMTL is offline
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Send a message via MSN to SKYMTL
    Quote Originally Posted by Wrench View Post
    apparently ATI spank Nvida all around.
    Maybe in the benchmark but not in the game itself. The second AA is turned on, the NV cards surge to the front. Without AA, ATI dominates.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 05-26-2010, 02:49 PM #19
    annihilat0r
    annihilat0r is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    The AMD slides say that the benches were done with 197 Forceware drivers. The 257's might have changed the situation.
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 05-26-2010, 02:50 PM #20
    Wrench
    Wrench is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    243
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    Maybe in the benchmark but not in the game itself. The second AA is turned on, the NV cards surge to the front. Without AA, ATI dominates.

    Oops my fault.

    I was looking at some wrong columns.


    http://www.hardocp.com/images/news/1...6Tk_1_13_l.jpg
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 05-26-2010, 02:52 PM #21
    =[PULSAR]=
    =[PULSAR]= is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    CT, USA!!!
    Posts
    2,821
    Send a message via ICQ to =[PULSAR]= Send a message via AIM to =[PULSAR]= Send a message via MSN to =[PULSAR]= Send a message via Skype™ to =[PULSAR]=
    That chart is about 15fps off from my matching system, with a slight OC.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 05-26-2010, 03:12 PM #22
    Chumbucket843
    Chumbucket843 is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Posts
    1,968
    Quote Originally Posted by Wrench View Post
    Oops my fault.

    I was looking at some wrong columns.


    http://www.hardocp.com/images/news/1...6Tk_1_13_l.jpg
    you might want a better/more reliable source. for some reason AMD likes to put the 5000 series ahead of the 400 series.

    http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...review-13.html
    this is the only site i could find that benched AVP.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 05-26-2010, 03:14 PM #23
    annihilat0r
    annihilat0r is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    Guys, we are all running the bench at medium settings without AA. We should run with the command line -config=name_of_your_config.txt and create a config file.

    My default results with a HD5970 at 850MHz and 19x12 for comparison:

    Resolution: 1920 x 1200
    Texture Quality: 2
    Shadow Quality: 3
    Anisotropic Filtering: 16
    SSAO: ON
    Vertical Sync: OFF
    DX11 Tessellation: ON
    DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
    DX11 MSAA Samples: 1


    Benchmark Summary:

    Number of frames: 9188
    Average Frame Time: 11.4ms
    Average FPS: 87.7
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 05-26-2010, 03:19 PM #24
    theystolemyname
    theystolemyname is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    53
    Stock 5870 using cat 10.4

    Using Video Settings from file <config.txt>:

    Resolution: 1920 x 1200
    Texture Quality: 3
    Shadow Quality: 3
    Anisotropic Filtering: 16
    SSAO: ON
    Vertical Sync: OFF
    DX11 Tessellation: ON
    DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
    DX11 MSAA Samples: 4


    Benchmark Summary:

    Number of frames: 3112
    Average Frame Time: 33.7ms
    Average FPS: 29.7
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  25. 05-26-2010, 03:21 PM #25
    NapalmV5
    NapalmV5 is offline
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,046
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules