Page 1 of 39 123411 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 954

Thread: AMD "Thuban" Core (Phenom II X6) XS Overclocking Charts

  1. #1
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219

    AMD "Thuban" Core (Phenom II X6) XS Overclocking Charts

    Hello-

    It is my intention to start an overclocking chart for the new AMD Thuban core CPUs for members of XS.

    Please read this information carefully before submitting your entry!

    If you want on the chart, please post the following information here and then PM me the post number.

    Here is an example. Please copy and paste this form, as my program needs it formatted in such a way to import your data. ALSO, please specify when posting if you are updating a previous entry (and specify which one) or adding a new one. It is conceivable that people may have more than one of these, so I don't want to assume your intentions.
    • CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
    • CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1011BPMW
    • CPU Frequency: 4000 MHz
    • CPU vCore: 1.475V
    • CPU Multiplier: 14x
    • CPU Turbo: Disabled
    • CPU NB Speed: 2200 MHz
    • HT Ref Speed: 200 MHz
    • RAM Speed: DDR3-1333
    • RAM Timings: 7-7-7-24-2T
    • RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
    • RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
    • Motherboard: ASUS M4A79T Deluxe
    • Chipset/Socket: AM3, 790FX + SB750
    • Cooling: Air (Freezer 7 Pro)
    • Temps: 40C Idle / 65C Load
    • Operating System: Windows 7
    • 32/64-Bit: 64
    • Stable/Suicide/Untested: Untested


    Stable = Tested stable for 8+ hours as defined below.
    Untested = Has not crashed or shown signs of instability but no formal testing has been done. May or may not be fully stable.
    Unstable = Has shown signs of instability. It has BSOD'd, crashed, restarted, mis-calculated results, errored during WCG, is acting funny, etc.

    Stable, for the purposes of this chart, is defined as a minimum of 8 hours of OCCT, Intel Burn Test, LinX, y-cruncher in stress test mode*, or Prime95. Prime set to blend or OCCT set to medium data set are currently the preference since it tests both the cores and memory systems simultaneously. You must have a screen shot of this in order to be added to the chart as stable as of May 1, 2010.

    * Launch the program, press 2, enter, 0, enter, x GB (x being nearly how much RAM your system has free according to task manager), and press enter. The program will periodically indicate how much time has been consumed for the testing.

    Load voltage is best reported as your actual voltage, not your VID (what is set in BIOS) if available. Many motherboards droop or overvolt versus the specified VID when under a load, and that can be a significant change. A multimeter is best, but integrated sensors are better than nothing. Report just your highest vCore be it under load, BIOS, or idle instead of your average.

    Temperatures are best reported as your CPU temperature instead of core temp. Core temps aren't reading properly with these new chips yet. Programs don't seem calibrated for their values quite yet and will report temps -10 to -20C versus actual core temp.


    The quick version for what to expect (stable) from an average Thuban CPU:
    On Air: 3900-4100 MHz is typical. 4000 MHz even is very common.
    On Water: 4000-4250 MHz is typical. 4100 is probably reasonable, but ymmv.
    Cold (SS Phase, Chilled, etc): 4300-4500 MHz. We don't have a lot of samples of CPUs having been stress tested under cold, so this is as much guess as observation.



    The charts, sorted by CPU frequency first, then vCore, then NB frequency. After that they're sorted by Poster and finally post number.

    Thanks to the new forum software upgrade, full-sized images are no longer possible within the thread itself. Grumble. Click on "View Full-Sized" above any image you want to see.

    View Full-Sized



    View Full-Sized



    View Full-Sized



    View Full-Sized



    View Full-Sized




    Need help locating your "stepping"?

    Last edited by Particle; 07-05-2011 at 07:25 AM.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    milwaukee
    Posts
    1,683
    i would add something for ambient temps just since it makes such a difference on these chips
    LEO!!!!
    amd phenom II x6 1100T | gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 . .
    2x2gb g.skill 2133c8 | 128gb g.skill falcon ssd
    sapphire ati 5850 | x-fi xtrememusic. . .
    samsung f4 2tb | samsung dvdrw . .
    corsair tx850w | windows 7 64-bit.
    ddc3.25 xspc restop | ek ltx | mc-tdx | BIP . .
    lycosa-g9-z2300 | 26" 1920x1200 lcd .

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    germany/indonesia
    Posts
    37
    * CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
    * CPU Stepping: -
    * CPU Frequency: 3810 MHz
    * CPU vCore: 1.400V
    * CPU Multiplier: 14x
    * CPU NB Speed: 2175 MHz
    * HT Link Speed: 272 MHz
    * RAM Speed: DDR3-1000
    * RAM Timings: 6-6-6-15-2T
    * RAM Configuration: 4 x 2GB
    * RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
    * Motherboard: Gigabyte 890gpa-ud3h
    * Chipset/Socket: 890GX + SB850, AM3
    Cooling: Noctua NH-D14
    * Temps: 30 Idle Bios/ 25C Idle Hwmonitor/ 39C Load Hwmonitor / Ambient temp = 28-29C
    * Operating System: Windows 7
    * 32/64-Bit: 64
    * Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
    Last edited by andy_satriani; 04-29-2010 at 07:50 PM.
    phenom II x6 1055T @ 3.85ghz 24/7
    gigabyte 890gpa-ud3h bios F7b
    G.SKILL (2 x 2GB) DDR3 1600 F3-12800CL9D-4GBNQ
    Radeon 4850 512MB
    Antec neo power 650 watt
    silverstone TJ-05 pearl white mod

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,119
    We need pictures with temp monitor etc.
    ~1~
    AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
    GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
    Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
    AMD Radeon VII
    ~2~
    AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
    Asus Prime X399-A
    GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
    AMD RX 5700 XT

  5. #5
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    = AOD temperatures shot?
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  6. #6
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Andy, it looks like you left some of my example values in there. Can you please double-check your data for which fields are correct? Just blank out the ones you don't know.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Australia, Sydney
    Posts
    113
    * CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
    * CPU Stepping:
    * CPU Frequency: 4040 MHz
    * CPU vCore: 1.50V
    * CPU Multiplier: 14x
    * CPU NB Speed: 2900 MHz
    * HT Link Speed: 290 MHz
    * RAM Speed: DDR3-1535
    * RAM Timings: 7-7-7-24-2T
    * RAM Configuration: 1 x 2GB
    * RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
    * Motherboard: Gigabyte 890 GPA-UDH3
    * Chipset/Socket: 890 AM3
    * Cooling: Vapochill LIghtspeed 250watt version
    * Temps: -40C Idle / -24C Load
    * Operating System: Windows 7
    * 32/64-Bit: 64
    * Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable


    Click to view full size!



    Click to view full size!
    Maximus Gene-z crazy little board.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2
    CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
    CPU Stepping: CCBE CB 1012 APMW
    CPU Frequency: 4000 MHz
    CPU vCore: 1.428v (Load Voltage)
    CPU Multiplier: 20x
    CPU Turbo: Disabled
    CPU NB Speed: 2600 MHz
    HT Ref Speed: 200 MHz
    RAM Speed: DDR3-1600
    RAM Timings: 7-7-7-24-1T
    RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
    RAM vDIMM: 1.66
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV
    Chipset/Socket: AM3, 890FX + SB850
    Cooling: Air (Noctua NH-D14)
    Temps: 34CIdle / 55C Load
    Operating System: Windows 7
    32/64-Bit: 64
    Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable 14hrs 25mins Prime Blend



    Bios Settings
    CPU Voltage - 1.381250
    CPU/NB Voltage - 1.200000
    CPU VDDA - 2.51250
    DRAM Voltage - 1.66250
    HT Voltage - 1.21250
    NB Voltage - 1.11250
    NB 1.8V Voltage - 1.802000
    SB Voltage - 1.113000
    VDDR Voltage - 1.205750
    VDDRPCIE Voltage - 1.113000
    DRAM CTRL REF Voltage - 0.500
    DRAM DATA REF Voltage - 0.500

    CPU LLC - Enabled
    CPU/NB LLC - Enabled
    CPU Spread Spectrum - Disabled
    PCIE Spread Spectrum - Disabled

    Cool N Quiet - Disabled
    C1E Support - Disabled


    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	pi1m.jpg 
Views:	33958 
Size:	134.2 KB 
ID:	104316  
    Last edited by spacemonkey_15; 05-18-2010 at 08:24 AM.

  9. #9
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Initial charts are up. We need more submissions!
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  10. #10
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    particle: dont worry , wait some days...Thubans are "fresh"
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    Hey Particle great work on the chart........Im wondering could you add names to it? Itd kinda be nice to see someones result and know who it is and maybe ask about a particular setup or settings!.......

    EDIT NM I see the names at the end there
    AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
    Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
    Asus Crosshair IV Formula
    ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
    12gb Gskill 1300mhz
    HIS HD5970
    Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
    case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK

    4.61ghz water

    4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
    http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
    25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
    21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260

    Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
    Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
    Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430

    If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Porto, Portugal
    Posts
    265
    I have a X6 1055T and Asus Crosshair IV here but i'm noob in AMD world.

    I would like some tips from AMD lovers about NB ferquency: it's importance?!... it's limition and it's connection with HT ou CPU Bus?!

    What's the first and main steps for overcloking a 1055T?!...

    Best Regards

    Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, SP1 Power By:
    Asus Rampage IV Formula
    Intel SBE 3930K
    Gskill RipJaws Z 14900 (1866 DDR3) 16GB 10-11-10-24
    EVGA 570 GTX SLI
    SSD Samsung P830 240GB
    Corsair AX850

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    1,070
    Higher NB speeds helps to speed up communication between the CPU and Integrated Memory Controller (I believe).

    What I do for overclocking is to see how high I can raise the HTT while still trying to use the stock vcore.
    Then once you hit a wall, bump up vcore a little and see how high you can get and repeat. Once you find a good speed, go ahead and try raising NB multiplier. Bump up CPU-NB voltage a little. Remember, the more CPU-NB you use, the more vcore you'll need as well.
    You're going to also have to disable turbo mode (and Cool 'N Quiet). I've hit 3.6GHz / 2.2GHz NB while still on default vcore (Prime95 Blend Stable).
    The trickiest part of overclocking AMD processors is trying to find your highest CPU clocks + NB clocks + Tight memory timings. There are different voltages to adjust, but I'm not familiar with Asus motherboards.

    And with locked multipliers it is difficult when playing with RAM speeds as well.
    With default speeds try overclocking your memory and see how high you can run, but with tigther timings (1333MHz CL 6 is good, CL5 even better. 1600MHz CL 7 is good, 6 is better and so forth).
    AMD love high NB with tight timings.

    Good luck!
    Last edited by richierich; 04-30-2010 at 03:00 AM.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    21
    Just saw this thread, already shipped my first 6-core system, but didn't take the stepping. It's most likely the same as the one which is ready in a box to replace my Q6600 which I just sold...

    * CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
    * CPU Stepping: Unsure - most likley CCBBE CB 1013CPAW
    * CPU Frequency: 3400 MHz
    * CPU vCore: 1.55V (Turbo Voltage)
    * CPU Multiplier: 16.5x (Turbo multi, actualy multi 14x)
    * CPU Turbo: Enabled (790XT-USB3 exhibited in BIOS and CPU-z scaling to 4GHz, however it should be 3.9GHz) - found 3.4 + turbo w/ 2430 NB > 3.7 no turbo w/ 3650 NB
    * CPU NB Speed: 2430 MHz
    * HT Link Speed: 2430 MHz
    * RAM Speed: DDR3-1610
    * RAM Timings: 9-9-9-24-2T
    * RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
    * RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
    * Motherboard: Gigabyte 790XT-USB3
    * Chipset/Socket: 790X + SB750, AM3
    * Cooling: Air (Aywun V8 w/ Scythe S-Flex 1600rpm)
    * Temps: 38C Idle / 55C Load
    * Operating System: Windows 7
    * 32/64-Bit: 64
    * Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable (12+ hrs Prime95 on all cores + 3DMark06 looping all tests bar CPU, OCCT LinPack Stable)

    Quote Originally Posted by richierich View Post
    With default speeds try overclocking your memory and see how high you can run, but with tigther timings (1333MHz CL 6 is good, CL5 even better. 1600MHz CL 7 is good, 6 is better and so forth).
    AMD love high NB with tight timings.

    Good luck!
    Some great advice from Richierich there. Make sure you purchase memory which is tested to work well with your board at the rated specs/can handle higher voltage/has been tested and confirmed working at tight timings.

    Richierich, what is the stepping of your CPU? It would be good to have your OC in these tables too
    Last edited by SquattingDog; 04-30-2010 at 03:36 AM.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    1,070
    1010BPMW. I can't decide which config I'd like to post up, either my sweet spot 3.95GHz one, or my highest, prime95 stable clock. Either way, I should have one posted tomorrow.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    'burb of Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,871
    Can you define "a few hours" when it comes to stability testing? If it's 2 or 3 (for prime95 (also what settings do you want, blend?)), I could get you some prelim numbers later tonight for my 1055T.

  17. #17
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    I'm not a stability nazi by any means. Use whatever method you'd normally use for determining stability. The more time the better though. The more accurate the submitted numbers are the more the chart will help us determine overclocking trends.

    I'd recommend as much stress mode on y-cruncher as you can stand with a minimum of 2-3 hours.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    118
    Hi guys,

    I am new to AMD Overclocking as I am coming from my Q6600. I just got a T1090 and wanted some easy oc. So I tried 19*200 @1,55Vcore crunching, but it wasn't even stable for 5 mins. Temps are at 42 Degrees. Now I am asking my self if there is another Voltage which is important, when I do some easy "raise multi" Ocing. I left my NB-Vcore at 1,15V but do I have to raise that one even though I didn't oc the NB frequency? The reason why I am a little bit confused is the fact that I saw some badass stable screens from other guys with even less CPU voltage.

    And just to make it clear, I am looking for 24/7 crunching stability.

    Thanks
    Soya
    Last edited by soya_crack; 04-30-2010 at 12:57 PM.

  19. #19
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    You shouldn't need that much voltage. As you get higher, it's actually possible for it to start hurting you faster than it helps.

    I suspect your problem is Turbo and Cool'n'Quiet being enabled. Your Turbo multiplier is going to be +2x, and if it is still enabling at times your CPU will be trying to run as high as 4200 MHz and likely at a reduced voltage of 1.475V. You might try editing your P-tables using K10Stat to make sure this isn't happening.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,160
    • CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
    • CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1014GPBW
    • CPU Frequency: 4017 MHz
    • CPU vCore: 1.460 - 1.476V
    • CPU Multiplier: 13x
    • CPU Turbo: Disabled
    • CPU NB Speed: 2473 MHz
    • HT Ref Speed: 309 MHz
    • RAM Speed: DDR3-1649
    • RAM Timings: 7-8-7-24-1T
    • RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
    • RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
    • Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    • Chipset/Socket: 890FX + SB850, AM3
    • Cooling: Water (Heatkiller 3.0)
    • Temps: 30C Idle / 46C Load
    • Operating System: Windows 7
    • 32/64-Bit: 64
    • Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable


  21. #21
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    118
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    You shouldn't need that much voltage. As you get higher, it's actually possible for it to start hurting you faster than it helps.

    I suspect your problem is Turbo and Cool'n'Quiet being enabled. Your Turbo multiplier is going to be +2x, and if it is still enabling at times your CPU will be trying to run as high as 4200 MHz and likely at a reduced voltage of 1.475V. You might try editing your P-tables using K10Stat to make sure this isn't happening.
    I actually disabled Turbo and C&Q. And as I crunch on all 6 cores Turbo shouldn't actually kick in.
    Last edited by soya_crack; 04-30-2010 at 09:53 PM.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,119
    Partical, I really think we need a SS as a must to be added. I can make up numbers right now and don't even own a chip.
    ~1~
    AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
    GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
    Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
    AMD Radeon VII
    ~2~
    AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
    Asus Prime X399-A
    GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
    AMD RX 5700 XT

  23. #23
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Australia, Sydney
    Posts
    113
    update for my original OC, this is 100 percent stable, play BC2, tf2 no crash, passed prime95 16mins, linx is still running its been 25mins.
    * CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
    * CPU Stepping:
    * CPU Frequency: 4410 MHz
    * CPU vCore: 1.575V in bios
    * CPU Multiplier: 14x
    * CPU NB Speed: 2835 MHz
    * HT Link Speed: 315 MHz
    * RAM Speed: DDR3-1680
    * RAM Timings: 7-7-7-20-2T
    * RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
    * RAM vDIMM: 1.635V
    * Motherboard: Gigabyte 890 GPA-UDH3
    * Chipset/Socket: 890 AM3
    * Cooling: Vapochill LIghtspeed 250watt version
    * Temps: -40C Idle / -4C Load
    * Operating System: Windows 7
    * 32/64-Bit: 64
    * Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable


    Click to view full size!
    Maximus Gene-z crazy little board.

  24. #24
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    187
    where is the Turbo option located on the 890GPA-UD3H? I have the F5 bios.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    1,070
    Quote Originally Posted by zaraza View Post
    where is the Turbo option located on the 890GPA-UD3H? I have the F5 bios.
    Look for an option called "Core Performance"

Page 1 of 39 123411 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •