Some benchmarks of Thuban X6 1090T

[superrugal]

source:http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread...=235891&page=3

CPU:AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE @ 3.2GHz
MB:MSI 790GX-G65 BIOS:4.0
RAM:A-data DDR3 1333 2GB*2
Winchip DDR3 1333 2GB*2
PSU:acbel 300w



CPUZ
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1129267

[zir_blazer]

Interesing...

Istanbul (Rev. HY-D0) CPUID = F-8-0
Lisbon?/Magny-Cours? (Rev. HY-D1) CPUID = F-9-1
Thuban (Rev. ?) CPUID = F-A-0

I should spend a bit more time looking for info on deciphering CPUID related info.

[richierich]

thank you so much superrugal. But is that vcore correct???

[Oliverda]

Interesing...

Istanbul (Rev. HY-D0) CPUID = F-8-0
Lisbon?/Magny-Cours? (Rev. HY-D1) CPUID = F-9-1
Thuban (Rev. ?) CPUID = F-A-0

I should spend a bit more time looking for info on deciphering CPUID related info.

Thuban is rev. E0

[[XC] Oj101]

Is that stock voltage or undervolted? If stock,

[CrimInalA]

I would like to see some new benches , this one is all over the net .

Just (pre)ordered myself a asus maxima IV , some DDR3 and a cpu cooler .
Now if they would only bring out the X6 already !

This one shows 6mbyte L3 cache , not 9mbyte as suggested before ?

[[XC] Oj101]

It was never going to be 9MB

[Lokinhow]

I would like to see some new benches , this one is all over the net .

Just (pre)ordered myself a asus maxima IV , some DDR3 and a cpu cooler .
Now if they would only bring out the X6 already !

This one shows 6mbyte L3 cache , not 9mbyte as suggested before ?

9MB L3 was never suggested, it was 9MB total cache, not only L3.

[CrimInalA]

Ah 9mbyte total , that clears things up .

[Chrono Detector]

Can't wait too see official reviews from hardware sites, already the 1090T looks nice. Hope it performs close to an i7

[Smartidiot89]

Can't wait too see official reviews from hardware sites, already the 1090T looks nice. Hope it performs close to an i7

I would say outperform Core i7 (980X excluded).

Also what's up with all these "leaked" benchmarks being done on a 32-bit OS?

[ajaidev]

I would say outperform Core i7 (980X excluded).

Also what's up with all these "leaked" benchmarks being done on a 32-bit OS?

I would say they will be rather equal and there will be very less difference between them. I do expect i7 860's to do quite a bit of damage in low thread apps because of its huge turbo capability but i7 930 vs 1055T will be epic even tough in price point of view the i7 930 is suppose to go after 1090T.

I am sure that 1090T will out perform i7 930 without much problem and since they are at the same price range 1090T is deadly. Intel will have to react and either they will introduce a new model with higher clock or lower prices of i7 950 or i7 870.

This is great indeed i hope 1055T is for $250-$260

[FlanK3r]

yes, i hear default is 1.25V without turbo activ? Its not all Oj101, he overclocked it easily up 4200 MHz

[[XC] Oj101]

I don't understand what you mean by "It's not all" What I meant is the voltage showing is incredibly low.

[gOtVoltage]

volt wise maybe (Deafault volts) on his Mobo..or CnQ

Nice real nice,, 6cores gonna get real interesting indeed.

[[XC] Oj101]

CnQ at 3.2GHz?

[i found nemo]

leave the stock reviews for the reviewers, i wanna see 3.6 ghz 3d '06

[BenchZowner]

All I see at the moment is x6 < i7 950

[PatRaceTin]

i am glad 1090T BE is unlock multi

(some news before say 1090T BE is locked multi)

[Titan7171]

Interesting I get a cpu score of 14,300+ at 4.2-4.3ghz.........hes getting 16,400+ at 3.2ghz.....very nice!

[AbelJemka]

All I see at the moment is x6 < i7 950

All i see at the moment is x6(price) < i7 950(price)...by a large margin!

[ajaidev]

All I see at the moment is x6 < i7 950

Ammm how if you compare a 1090T 3.2Ghz to a i7 950 3Ghz and you take in to account the score of 1055T



It is easy to see that the score is very close to that of i7 860.

Now if we look at this we can see that the 1090T score close to i7 960. The i7 960 is 3.2Ghz, as i see it the 1055T come close to i7 860's performance even tough i7 860 is suppose to be more expensive and the 1090T comes close to i7 960.



I am sure of two things:

1. 1055T will beat/come close to i7 920
2. 1090T will beat/come close to i7 950

Now the really interesting match will be i7 930/860 vs 1055T and i7 960 vs 1090T even tough they are at very different price points

Edit : The 11.5 scores for a few cpus


i7 920 4.80 with 4c/8t Win 7 64bit

[richierich]

Good analysis ajaidev.

[BenchZowner]

And the point is ? AMD needs a 2 cores and 200MHz advantage to match the 1 1/2 year old i7 tech 960 ?
No matter how I try to have a look at it, I can't see any "miracles" or progress from AMD.
Intel's closing in on faster clock-per-clock processors than Gulftown and going to 8 and 10 cores ( 16 & 20 threads ) in Nov/Dec or Jan-March 2011.
AMD's at 12 Cores / 12 threads, but unless their performance clock per clock and on a core to core basis is the same with these, those will barely compete with the 8c/16t Intel CPU.

They need to work harder.

Nice performance and good prices are always nice, but they need to step up the game before they get down below ( performance-wise ).

I'm all in for performance.
Can we have an Opteron 146 and DFI LP nF4 SLI-DR de-javu anytime soon AMD please ?

[Jowy Atreides]

All I see at the moment is x6 < i7 950

All I see is that the i7 950 had a clockspeed of 4ghz
..is that stock?

cos the x6 was, bring the x6 to 4ghz and see some whoopass

Oh, and check the prices big difference for the AMD win. Yes. Win.