Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Which rad: 120.4 or 140.3 ?

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Dublin, Eire
    Posts
    59

    Which rad: 120.4 or 140.3 ?

    I got a cheap used TJ07 that's undergoing painting at the moment and I plan on making this my next project

    I'm going for a single 5870 and i7 930 hopefully overclocked to 4GHz. I'm hoping to do this with a single loop and a quiet setup, so 600rpm fans or as close to that as possible.

    Is it realistic to expect one loop to cool both? (I hope so!)

    Would I be better off with a 140.3 or 120.4 rad? I'm under the impression that their performance is almost identical, and 3 fans would be quieter than 4. Would love to hear your opinions before I buy!

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    344
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=242144


    Look at the data and then draw your own conclusions to make a decision

  3. #3
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Latvia, Riga
    Posts
    3,972
    I'd say put whatever biggest rad you can fit. Of course definition of 'fit' differs for different cases as in requiring or not moding/cutting and willing or not to do such mods by owners. Bigger/more rads=less fan speed to reach wanted cooled temps=quieter.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast Aedubber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    961
    You can fit a Feser X-Changer QUAD 480 Extreme Performance Radiator in your case & they require low rpm fans and they have great cooling..
    Last edited by Aedubber; 04-01-2010 at 07:13 AM.
    HEATWARE
    x58-UD5 ▀▄ i7 950 4.0Ghz ▀▄ ZOTAC GTX 580 ▀▄ Mushkins 1600Mhz

  5. #5
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,638
    I use 140mm rads and I would say the selection of 140mm fans is lacking right now (but not a deal killer.)
    XTREMESupercomputer: Phase 2
    Live up to your name - November 1 - 8
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team

  6. #6
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Latvia, Riga
    Posts
    3,972
    Oh. I missed fact that tripple in question was for 140 mm fans :/. Well, anyway, someone already posted comparative test url

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    156
    Get something that uses 120mm fans... you have a better selection available.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Spain Madrid
    Posts
    28
    If you have enough space go for pa140,3 and use some custom home made fan adapter if you want 120mm fans , for example feser monsta is a 420 rad and many people mount 120mm fans on it...

    also you can buy bitspower fan adapter 120 to 140
    Last edited by samurai; 04-02-2010 at 06:59 AM.

  9. #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Back and forth between Florida and Maine
    Posts
    4,097
    Check out skinneelabs for a comparison of the Thermochill 140.3 vs 120.3 . At least gives you an idea how the 140.3 compares - then you'll need to do some extrapolation to see where the 120.4 fits in.

    Will the 140.3 fit in the TJ07 and still leave room for the PSU, etc. (not saying it won't just can't recall seeing one in that case). The 120.4 fits, lots of folks have used them. That would be my choice, given the fan selection available. And yes, you should be able to cool your CPU and GPU in the single loop.

  10. #10
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Well if me check the surface areas of the two:

    120.4: 120*120*4 = 57600mm^2
    140.3: 140*140*3 = 58800mm^2

    So the 140.3 radiator has (very slightly - 2%) more surface area while using bigger, slower rotating fans for quieter performance.
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  11. #11
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Quote Originally Posted by shazza View Post
    Will the 140.3 fit in the TJ07 and still leave room for the PSU, etc. (not saying it won't just can't recall seeing one in that case). The 120.4 fits, lots of folks have used them. That would be my choice, given the fan selection available. And yes, you should be able to cool your CPU and GPU in the single loop.
    It should, 120*4 = length of 480mm excluding barb vs 140*3 = 420mm excluding barbs
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    221
    Quote Originally Posted by Oj101 View Post
    Well if me check the surface areas of the two:

    120.4: 120*120*4 = 57600mm^2
    140.3: 140*140*3 = 58800mm^2

    So the 140.3 radiator has (very slightly - 2%) more surface area while using bigger, slower rotating fans for quieter performance.
    Just a small note here in regards to that comparison.
    The 140x3 may well have slightly more surface area, but you also need to consider whether 140x3 fans that you'll be using can push equivalent amount of air through the rad, compared to the 120x4 fans.

  13. #13
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Well it also depends on the fans he's going to be using, a single 140mm will beat one of those cheap Chinese $1.50 LED 120mm fans
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    221
    Quote Originally Posted by Oj101 View Post
    Well it also depends on the fans he's going to be using, a single 140mm will beat one of those cheap Chinese $1.50 LED 120mm fans
    That's what I was saying.
    I've just gone through the ppcs listing here on the 140 fans. There's not much choice of it at the moment.

    I can safely say that, at the moment, using 140 will not get you that much higher performance benefit (no real high CFM 140 fans), and cost wise, total is about the same, accounting the higher cost of the 140 rad and considering you only need 3 fans.

    When more producers start to fill the 140 line, I suspect you'll be able to get higher benefit on performance. Cause the current 140s are more concentrated on whisper quiet models.

    So, if you can fit the 140, I'd say go for it.
    You're only cooling CPU and GPU anyway. You don't need high rpm - high noise fans. By the time you're adding more stuff into your loop, they'l have better 140 fans that you can use.

    Can't go wrong either way.

  15. #15
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    You're backing up what I'm saying - the noise factor
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    102
    If you meant to have the rad in your case it will be troubulesome to fit any of them in.

  17. #17
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    That's what power tools are for
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •