not counting the games where ati cant run phsx ofcoarse
as for the drivers used i think the fermi is on 197's and 10.2 so like i said
cheaper card then the 5870 and just as fast.
and i guess a 5850 is faster when clocked then a stock 5870??? i think no?
Last edited by cowie; 03-26-2010 at 10:40 AM.
Holy crap, 93C load temperature?
I think I'll keep my 5870 thank you very much.
Gigabyte EP45 UD3P
Q9550 E0 500x8 4.0 GHZ 1.360v
ECO A.L.C Cooler with Gentle Typhoon PushPull
Kingston HyperX T1 5-5-5-18 1:1
XFX Radeon 6950 @ 880/1300 (Shader unlocked)
WD Caviar Black 2 x 640GB - Short Stroked 120GB RAID0 128KB Stripe - 540GB RAID1
Saved almost all charts, here we go
¤ Core i7 920 @ 4.54 Ghz Watercooled ¤ EVGA X58 SLI3 ¤ Mushkin 3 x 2 GB @ 1732 Mhz ¤ CrossfireX XFX HD 6950@6970 ¤ X-Fi XtremeGamer Fatal1ty Pro ¤ XFX 850W Black Edition ¤ AOC 416VA 24"
¤ Swiftech Apogee GTZ + MCP-655 + Res v1 ¤ Feser X-Changer 360 + 3x Akasa Apache (deadly quiet!)
Radeon user? Try RadeonPro, I need your feedback
Check out my Build log!!!
Motivation: Sponsord by Galaxy
Check the build-log for more
hexus has pulled the review..
Taking into consideration that ATI won't be lowering prices soon(hopefully they change their mind), then wait for the "games" and some cheaper cards.
Sad to say, it looks like Fermi+ should be the key for much cheaper DX11 cards.
From now on, I'll scarcely look for another Fermi review, wake me up when some magical forceware arrives.
Last edited by GoldenTiger; 03-26-2010 at 10:51 AM.
seems to hate higher resolutions, and really loses a lot compared to the 5870 when dx11 is added in dirt 2.
i7 920 @ 4GHz 1.25v
GTX 470 @ 859MHz 1062mv
If numbers in FC2 are using ranch built-in benchmark, they are very poor indication of real performance. Wait for Anandtech or Hardware Canucks review.