Catalyst 3.10's out.

[STEvil]

Get 'em while they're hot?

22mb Version:
http://www2.ati.com/drivers/wxp-w2k-...m1-012924c.exe

-Smaller Version-
Driver:
http://www2.ati.com/drivers/wxp-w2k-...m1-012924c.exe
Control Panel:
http://www2.ati.com/drivers/control-...m1-012924c.exe

[Nebulous]

Gonna give 'em a test drive.

Thanx!

[skate2snow]

thx alot man!!!

[pik-ard v1.1]

the 3.10's are ever so slightly better then the 3.7's. about .5% better.

thats just my limited experience though... and on a r9100.

[Swiftech]

I'm getting the Omega version once it's there

[XtremepH]

well the 3.10's didn't help me at all. they said they fixed the texture corruption in madden 2004 but its still there. guess i'll have to wait till 4.0 cats come out.

[Susquehannock]

ThanX.

Whoa! d/ling @ 464KB\sec ... nice server.

[PTK]

While this Cat 3.10 WHQL is 98% the same as the 3.9 COD hotfix + WHQL i feel that the next set will be a good one [ talking about the first set to be released in 2004 here ]. On the games i play only found one problem so far. Couple very good bugfixes in those.

Btw, guessing you didnt check out the multimedia irc chat yesterday but there Terry 'CatalystMaker' Makedon stated that they are expecting a performance boost in 3D-performance either in 4.1 or 4.2 set. Meaning they must have found something but he doesnt know what set it will be introduced.

PTK

[wicktron]

Originally posted by XtremepH
well the 3.10's didn't help me at all. they said they fixed the texture corruption in madden 2004 but its still there. guess i'll have to wait till 4.0 cats come out.

I have no texture corruption in Madden2004 with 3.9 or 3.10.

[Ewok]

Originally posted by PTK
Btw, guessing you didnt check out the multimedia irc chat yesterday but there Terry 'CatalystMaker' Makedon stated that they are expecting a performance boost in 3D-performance either in 4.1 or 4.2 set. Meaning they must have found something but he doesnt know what set it will be introduced.

in other words they are going to magically find some extra speed just as HL2 comes out. amazing coincidence that will be.

[Vitalizer]

i hope it fixes the freeze lags in sof2

[glock19owner]

I posted this in another 3.10 thread...When I install new drivers I like to test older games first...like benchmarking Q3...when I installed the 3.10's the first thing I tried was Q3...instant error...reinstalled Q3...same thing...read about some people having install problems...so I reinstalled the 3.10's...and then reinstalled Q3 just incase...still a error on start up...left Q3 as it was...uninstalled the 3.10's and reinstalled the 3.9 omega drivers...fired up Q3...worked without any problems...

My Q is...has anyone else tried Q3...and if so...was Q3 able to run?

[quicksilver98]

I run the omega drivers... they run pretty good..

[glock19owner]

Ok...must of not made myself clear...what I was asking is...if anyone has installed the 3.10's and then Q3 stopped running?

[Silversink]

Posted this yesterday in the driver section

[Johnny Knoxvill]

no problems here, working fine

[twiggy]

Finally fixed the BF'42 bug!

[Cutthroat]

Has anyone noted an increase in 3dmark?

[Silversink]

Originally posted by twiggy
Finally fixed the BF'42 bug!

Thats exactly why I downloaded them immediately yesterday

[pik-ard v1.1]

Originally posted by Cutthroat
Has anyone noted an increase in 3dmark?

3dmark2k1

hardware:
motherboard: MSI K7T Turbo(ms-6330)
processor: AMD Athlon t-bird at 1356(12x113)
ram: pc133 @ pc146 (FSB + 33)
video card: Visiontek Radeon 9100
car low: 300/277
car high: 297/277
dragothic low: 297/277
dragothic high: 295/277
lobby low: 300/277
lobby high: 300/277
nature: 295/275

drivers:
3.1's: 6933
3.2's: 7040
3.7's: 7014
3.10's: 7072

basicly, the 3.2's are #1 or close to it in every test except nature, which they get stomped over completely... the 3.10's take the #1 in nature, giving them the slight edge over the 3.2's.

[Dr.Demonic69]

Originally posted by twiggy
Finally fixed the BF'42 bug!

What bug are u talking about????

[twiggy]

Originally posted by Dr.Demonic69
What bug are u talking about????

This one.

[Kobalt]

Originally posted by twiggy
This one.

o good...so it wasnt my system... i was beginning to think i did somthing wrong

well LMFAO yesterday i installed these without knowing they were the 3.10's...didnt eeven look at the driver name...simply went"wierd that score is like 500points higher than my last install of windows"

i dont understand the name though...it should have been the 3.95's or 4.0's(even though the 4.0's will prolly be a big release or something) not 3.10's, b/c to nubs that can mean 3.1.

[pik-ard v1.1]

what do noobs need with good drivers anyway then?

if they cant tell the difference between three point one, and three point ten, then bah i say. :p

and, there might be a 3.11, 3.12, 3.13, 3.14, so, instead of 3.95, 3.975, 3.9875, 3.99375 etc etc.

although, i would think there would be a 4.0 before it gets to that, but i think its more of a "just in case" thing.

[typer77]

Originally posted by Silversink
Thats exactly why I downloaded them immediately yesterday

what was the bug in BF1942?



Oops.. guess I should've finished reading the thread first...... I didn't have that problem...