Great comparrison ... it´s better than Xt?
Im amazed
Great comparrison ... it´s better than Xt?
Im amazed
Cant wait to get my loop up and going with this block. Just got in yesterday
Gaming Setup
Intel X3440
Gigabyte H55n USB3
2x4gb Mushkin 996999
EVGA GTX 580
Silverstone Sugo SG-05
Corsair H60 w/ Push/Pull AP15s
Seasonic SS-560KM 560w
With two pumps at the end of the day all I care about are temps and the temp difference is "meh" compared to HK/XT. No compelling reason at all to upgrade.
My HeatWare: http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=70151
thanks for taking the time to review and put this analysis together for us. it is greatly appreciated.
I don't think my heatkiller is ready for retirement just yet..
Project TJ07 WeeMaan edition in progress...
i7 920 @ 4,4ghz, P6T Deluxe, Corsair Dominator 6Gb, HD5870, OCZ Vertex 60gb + Samsung F1 1tb
Heatkiller copper, EK 5870, Thermochill 120.4, DDC 3.2
Thanks for your efforts testing all those plates. Weeks ago noone really believes in what I am stating
Thanks for the review! This review was linked over at OCN here.
CPU water blocks have improved so much, so fast, it is truly amazing.
Email/web browsing PC
MM Ascension case, 24/7 settings
Classified, 980x @ 4,525Mhz, HT on 1.39V
(3) ATI 5870's@ 1062Mhz
G skill perfect storm RAM s 6gb, 2,176 Mhz CAS 8
(4) intel x25m RAID 0
CPU loop, EK supreme HF, EK mobo block, 500MM bitspower res, 2 DDC 3.25's on XSPC top, 2 XSPC RX 360's, 1 XSPC RX 480, GPU loop, EK water blocks, with nickel backs, 2 swiftech mcr 320's, 500MM bitspower res, ddc 3.25, XSPC top all with 1850 RPM gentle typhoons
plus many other rigs.
I'm just wondering why the EK logo is backwards
My HeatWare: http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=70151
mine is correct? maybe the upside down logo's are the ringers for testers?
Email/web browsing PC
MM Ascension case, 24/7 settings
Classified, 980x @ 4,525Mhz, HT on 1.39V
(3) ATI 5870's@ 1062Mhz
G skill perfect storm RAM s 6gb, 2,176 Mhz CAS 8
(4) intel x25m RAID 0
CPU loop, EK supreme HF, EK mobo block, 500MM bitspower res, 2 DDC 3.25's on XSPC top, 2 XSPC RX 360's, 1 XSPC RX 480, GPU loop, EK water blocks, with nickel backs, 2 swiftech mcr 320's, 500MM bitspower res, ddc 3.25, XSPC top all with 1850 RPM gentle typhoons
plus many other rigs.
iandh, just for the record, any oops like that on your products, feel free to send them my way.
Email/web browsing PC
MM Ascension case, 24/7 settings
Classified, 980x @ 4,525Mhz, HT on 1.39V
(3) ATI 5870's@ 1062Mhz
G skill perfect storm RAM s 6gb, 2,176 Mhz CAS 8
(4) intel x25m RAID 0
CPU loop, EK supreme HF, EK mobo block, 500MM bitspower res, 2 DDC 3.25's on XSPC top, 2 XSPC RX 360's, 1 XSPC RX 480, GPU loop, EK water blocks, with nickel backs, 2 swiftech mcr 320's, 500MM bitspower res, ddc 3.25, XSPC top all with 1850 RPM gentle typhoons
plus many other rigs.
Thanks Vapor for the review. Been waiting for it and I am happy I did.
hi,guys and pros.i just want to ask if my loop is suitable for the plate #1
EK res(tube) -- mcp655(none speed controller) with bitspower top -- EK XT 360 RAD -- EK Supreme HF+P1 -- EK XT 240 RAD -- EK FC-GTX285(will be sli soon) -- pump
im using sycthe slip stream 1200rpm on all of my rads and were in push and pull config top and rear of my case.ambient temp im not sure but im from asia Singapore,my room is quite small and abit humid
im currently using EK supreme LT acetal+nickle and the my i7 920 is at 200x18 3.6mhz,1.3 vcore idling at 50,46,48,47(core temp)
Haven't you noticed in review Supreme HF even with most restrictive plate P1 is less restricting then EK Supreme / Apogee XT / Heatkiller 3.0 ? Try mouseover on Waterblock Comparison chart. So not only you'll get better temps, but more flow overall in loop. If additional 3.5 degrees better temps are worth buying new block is different question though. If you are happy with current setup, i see no reason to spend extra money. Maybe in next project? (and at that also change D5 to D5 vario or even DDC 3.25)
With respect Vapor, I dont get similar results. The XT is more restrictive than the EK Sup HF, but even with P1, my Apogee XT is still ahead by about 0.47 deg C on a i7 920 @ 4.2 and 3.5 V (the average of 10 mounts for both on a P6T Deluxe V2). The i7 975 is even more pronounced at 4.4 GHz with the Apogee XT averaging 0.61 deg C lower than the EK Supreme HF. I read your test methodology and it seems fine. Perhaps a review of your data ?
Jay
Please don't read any "tone" into the following. I'm a very humble guy.
I very much appreciate your sincere effort in doing this test.
I know you don't have time for genuine scientific tests with proper testing protocols. You don't get paid enough for that. Many people here would not understand or appreciate the difference anyway. I won't belabor that point further.
I have one minor complaint about your test:
As you note in your report, you tested the original installed as shipped plate before disassembling and reassembling the block, but tested all the others after disassembling and reassembling the block. I think you should have re-tested the original installed as shipped plate again after testing all the others. I think you needed to do this before drawing any final conclusion in regard to that plate.
BTW, I'm curious to know how you 1) ensured that the torque applied to the assembly screws when reassembling the block was the same each time and 2) that the mount pressure was the same each time? The EK installation instructions don't cover either one of those details (other than to plead with the installer not to tighten the assembly screws too much in order to avoid leaks).
Thanks!
If you don't like what I have to say, please feel free to ignore it. I do!
Core i7 920 (D0) @ 4.0Ghz, P6T Deluxe V2 (0901), 12GB Corsair CM3X2G1600C7 @ 1600 7.7.7.20 2T, ATCS 840, Antec TPQ 850, Radeon 4850, TMS-200 + TMS-EB200, EK Supreme HF, EK-D5 dual top, 2x MCP-655-B, MCR-420, 7X Skythe D1225C12B5AP-15, Durelene tubing. Obviously not a gamer as you can tell by the low end video card.
Bookmarks