Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 349

Thread: [Review] Round 2: EK Supreme HF

  1. #26
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    463
    Great comparrison ... it´s better than Xt?

    Im amazed

  2. #27
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    142
    Cant wait to get my loop up and going with this block. Just got in yesterday
    Gaming Setup
    Intel X3440
    Gigabyte H55n USB3
    2x4gb Mushkin 996999
    EVGA GTX 580
    Silverstone Sugo SG-05
    Corsair H60 w/ Push/Pull AP15s
    Seasonic SS-560KM 560w

  3. #28
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,884
    Quote Originally Posted by Raiden View Post
    Great comparrison ... it´s better than Xt?

    Im amazed
    even the highest performing jet plate (p1) has a higher flow than the XT. Both the p1 and p2 have better flow and temps.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,422
    With two pumps at the end of the day all I care about are temps and the temp difference is "meh" compared to HK/XT. No compelling reason at all to upgrade.

  5. #30
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by dejanh View Post
    With two pumps at the end of the day all I care about are temps and the temp difference is "meh" compared to HK/XT. No compelling reason at all to upgrade.
    Yeah, certainly. It's pretty hard to make a breakthrough in CPU waterblock performance these days, though, I believe...
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  6. #31
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    19
    thanks for taking the time to review and put this analysis together for us. it is greatly appreciated.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    334
    I don't think my heatkiller is ready for retirement just yet..
    Project TJ07 WeeMaan edition in progress...

    i7 920 @ 4,4ghz, P6T Deluxe, Corsair Dominator 6Gb, HD5870, OCZ Vertex 60gb + Samsung F1 1tb

    Heatkiller copper, EK 5870, Thermochill 120.4, DDC 3.2

  8. #33
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Germany, Solingen
    Posts
    310
    Thanks for your efforts testing all those plates. Weeks ago noone really believes in what I am stating

  9. #34
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Latvia, Riga
    Posts
    3,972
    Quote Originally Posted by scamps View Post
    Thanks for your efforts testing all those plates..
    Oh noes, even blank one?

  10. #35
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,489
    THANK GOD, I was getting really freaking sick of all of the HK3.0 builds.

    Congrats Eddy...

    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Yeah, certainly. It's pretty hard to make a breakthrough in CPU waterblock performance these days, though, I believe...
    This.

    Anyone waiting for a BIG breakthrough, is going to be waiting a long freaking time.
    Asus G73- i7-740QM, Mobility 5870, 6Gb DDR3-1333, OCZ Vertex II 90Gb

  11. #36
    _
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wisconsin, United States
    Posts
    1,235
    Thanks for the review! This review was linked over at OCN here.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    605
    CPU water blocks have improved so much, so fast, it is truly amazing.
    Email/web browsing PC
    MM Ascension case, 24/7 settings
    Classified, 980x @ 4,525Mhz, HT on 1.39V
    (3) ATI 5870's@ 1062Mhz
    G skill perfect storm RAM s 6gb, 2,176 Mhz CAS 8
    (4) intel x25m RAID 0
    CPU loop, EK supreme HF, EK mobo block, 500MM bitspower res, 2 DDC 3.25's on XSPC top, 2 XSPC RX 360's, 1 XSPC RX 480, GPU loop, EK water blocks, with nickel backs, 2 swiftech mcr 320's, 500MM bitspower res, ddc 3.25, XSPC top all with 1850 RPM gentle typhoons
    plus many other rigs.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North East UK
    Posts
    1,029
    I'm just wondering why the EK logo is backwards

  14. #39
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,422
    Quote Originally Posted by coolmiester View Post
    I'm just wondering why the EK logo is backwards
    "But it looked right on the press!"

  15. #40
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    605
    mine is correct? maybe the upside down logo's are the ringers for testers?
    Email/web browsing PC
    MM Ascension case, 24/7 settings
    Classified, 980x @ 4,525Mhz, HT on 1.39V
    (3) ATI 5870's@ 1062Mhz
    G skill perfect storm RAM s 6gb, 2,176 Mhz CAS 8
    (4) intel x25m RAID 0
    CPU loop, EK supreme HF, EK mobo block, 500MM bitspower res, 2 DDC 3.25's on XSPC top, 2 XSPC RX 360's, 1 XSPC RX 480, GPU loop, EK water blocks, with nickel backs, 2 swiftech mcr 320's, 500MM bitspower res, ddc 3.25, XSPC top all with 1850 RPM gentle typhoons
    plus many other rigs.

  16. #41
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,489
    Quote Originally Posted by justin.kerr View Post
    mine is correct? maybe the upside down logo's are the ringers for testers?
    More like, "Oops, I can't sell that... hey, I know, I'll send it to a tester"
    Asus G73- i7-740QM, Mobility 5870, 6Gb DDR3-1333, OCZ Vertex II 90Gb

  17. #42
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    605
    iandh, just for the record, any oops like that on your products, feel free to send them my way.
    Email/web browsing PC
    MM Ascension case, 24/7 settings
    Classified, 980x @ 4,525Mhz, HT on 1.39V
    (3) ATI 5870's@ 1062Mhz
    G skill perfect storm RAM s 6gb, 2,176 Mhz CAS 8
    (4) intel x25m RAID 0
    CPU loop, EK supreme HF, EK mobo block, 500MM bitspower res, 2 DDC 3.25's on XSPC top, 2 XSPC RX 360's, 1 XSPC RX 480, GPU loop, EK water blocks, with nickel backs, 2 swiftech mcr 320's, 500MM bitspower res, ddc 3.25, XSPC top all with 1850 RPM gentle typhoons
    plus many other rigs.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    2,443
    Thanks Vapor for the review. Been waiting for it and I am happy I did.

  19. #44
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    25
    hi,guys and pros.i just want to ask if my loop is suitable for the plate #1

    EK res(tube) -- mcp655(none speed controller) with bitspower top -- EK XT 360 RAD -- EK Supreme HF+P1 -- EK XT 240 RAD -- EK FC-GTX285(will be sli soon) -- pump

    im using sycthe slip stream 1200rpm on all of my rads and were in push and pull config top and rear of my case.ambient temp im not sure but im from asia Singapore,my room is quite small and abit humid

    im currently using EK supreme LT acetal+nickle and the my i7 920 is at 200x18 3.6mhz,1.3 vcore idling at 50,46,48,47(core temp)

  20. #45
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Lévis,Québec,Canada
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by Eddy_EK View Post
    I guess we'll be changing assembling jet plate to #1.
    Thanks alot eddy for doing that, it will save alot of problem to many people
    Quote Originally Posted by DDtung
    We overclock and crunch you to the ground

  21. #46
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Latvia, Riga
    Posts
    3,972
    Quote Originally Posted by 094145 View Post
    hi,guys and pros.i just want to ask if my loop is suitable for the plate #1 ..
    Haven't you noticed in review Supreme HF even with most restrictive plate P1 is less restricting then EK Supreme / Apogee XT / Heatkiller 3.0 ? Try mouseover on Waterblock Comparison chart. So not only you'll get better temps, but more flow overall in loop. If additional 3.5 degrees better temps are worth buying new block is different question though. If you are happy with current setup, i see no reason to spend extra money. Maybe in next project? (and at that also change D5 to D5 vario or even DDC 3.25)

  22. #47
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by churchy View Post
    Haven't you noticed in review Supreme HF even with most restrictive plate P1 is less restricting then EK Supreme / Apogee XT / Heatkiller 3.0 ? Try mouseover on Waterblock Comparison chart. So not only you'll get better temps, but more flow overall in loop. If additional 3.5 degrees better temps are worth buying new block is different question though. If you are happy with current setup, i see no reason to spend extra money. Maybe in next project? (and at that also change D5 to D5 vario or even DDC 3.25)
    i actually bought it already and just looking around for answer bout the jetplate on which one to use,so i will just for the #1 plate and will update after all is done.

  23. #48
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    La Jolla, CA, USA
    Posts
    545
    With respect Vapor, I dont get similar results. The XT is more restrictive than the EK Sup HF, but even with P1, my Apogee XT is still ahead by about 0.47 deg C on a i7 920 @ 4.2 and 3.5 V (the average of 10 mounts for both on a P6T Deluxe V2). The i7 975 is even more pronounced at 4.4 GHz with the Apogee XT averaging 0.61 deg C lower than the EK Supreme HF. I read your test methodology and it seems fine. Perhaps a review of your data ?

    Jay

  24. #49
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    72
    Quote Originally Posted by coolmiester View Post
    I'm just wondering why the EK logo is backwards
    Because some people, like me will turn the block 180 degrees because of the tubing/flow order. That way you still have some piece of logo/text the right way up

  25. #50
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    184
    Please don't read any "tone" into the following. I'm a very humble guy.

    I very much appreciate your sincere effort in doing this test.

    I know you don't have time for genuine scientific tests with proper testing protocols. You don't get paid enough for that. Many people here would not understand or appreciate the difference anyway. I won't belabor that point further.

    I have one minor complaint about your test:

    As you note in your report, you tested the original installed as shipped plate before disassembling and reassembling the block, but tested all the others after disassembling and reassembling the block. I think you should have re-tested the original installed as shipped plate again after testing all the others. I think you needed to do this before drawing any final conclusion in regard to that plate.

    BTW, I'm curious to know how you 1) ensured that the torque applied to the assembly screws when reassembling the block was the same each time and 2) that the mount pressure was the same each time? The EK installation instructions don't cover either one of those details (other than to plead with the installer not to tighten the assembly screws too much in order to avoid leaks).

    Thanks!
    If you don't like what I have to say, please feel free to ignore it. I do!

    Core i7 920 (D0) @ 4.0Ghz, P6T Deluxe V2 (0901), 12GB Corsair CM3X2G1600C7 @ 1600 7.7.7.20 2T, ATCS 840, Antec TPQ 850, Radeon 4850, TMS-200 + TMS-EB200, EK Supreme HF, EK-D5 dual top, 2x MCP-655-B, MCR-420, 7X Skythe D1225C12B5AP-15, Durelene tubing. Obviously not a gamer as you can tell by the low end video card.

Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •