Would the 500GB platters offer more performance than the 300GB on a 1TB harddrive ?
Would the 500GB platters offer more performance than the 300GB on a 1TB harddrive ?
i would believe so
Intel Core2Quad Q6600 @ 3.6 | Thermalright Ultra Extreme
EVGA 780i SLi
8gb ADATA 4x2gb DDR2 800
Evga 260gtx core 216
Western Digital 300gb Raptor x 2 | Seagate 7200.11 1.5tb x 2
Klipsch 5.1 Ultra Promedia
Corsair 1000hx
Lian Li TYR PC-X500
Dell 3007fpw 30" Widescreen LCD
yes the change was good for about 20-35MB/s and samsung offers better drives than wd right now
Last edited by zanzabar; 02-09-2010 at 01:49 AM.
5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
When we are talking about HDD performance, using purpose must be stated (ex. system drive or storage drive) so you can easily determine the best bang for buckOriginally Posted by Demo
If you are refering to the OS/system drive WD is still the ruler and his 2TB Black HDD is truly piece of art (not because of the 500GB/plate but other more significant changes under the hood).
Chart
Last edited by dh41400; 02-09-2010 at 06:50 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks