Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 89 of 89

Thread: Arauna: Real-time Ray Tracing Benchmark - Post your Results

  1. #76
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,264
    Score : 6412

    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i

  2. #77
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,264
    wow, a train of new results hehe, I'll update shortly.

    There should be absolutely no GPU usage, the bench is very sensitive to RAM Bandwidth, Cache (L3 speed), (so those uncore/CPU-NB clocks) so perhaps your other system isn't as fast there..?

  3. #78
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    605
    rig in sig, 24/7 settings
    9056

    ran it with HT off same settings otherwise, and got 8431
    Last edited by justin.kerr; 05-04-2010 at 01:27 PM.
    Email/web browsing PC
    MM Ascension case, 24/7 settings
    Classified, 980x @ 4,525Mhz, HT on 1.39V
    (3) ATI 5870's@ 1062Mhz
    G skill perfect storm RAM s 6gb, 2,176 Mhz CAS 8
    (4) intel x25m RAID 0
    CPU loop, EK supreme HF, EK mobo block, 500MM bitspower res, 2 DDC 3.25's on XSPC top, 2 XSPC RX 360's, 1 XSPC RX 480, GPU loop, EK water blocks, with nickel backs, 2 swiftech mcr 320's, 500MM bitspower res, ddc 3.25, XSPC top all with 1850 RPM gentle typhoons
    plus many other rigs.

  4. #79
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    528
    5349 points
    aurena_01.JPG

  5. #80
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,366
    Last edited by kl0012; 05-07-2010 at 01:45 AM.

  6. #81
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    950
    Whoa MajorD, you mixed me up with Pyr0:
    ----- #8 ---- 6460 - gmat -------------Intel Core i7 920--------- 3800Mhz -- 4/8-- DDR3-1810 8-8-8-24
    should be:
    ----- #8 ---- 6460 - gmat -------------Intel Core i7 975EE------- 4142Mhz -- 4/8-- DDR3-2000 8-8-8-24
    and i'll try to post a new bench next week after the WCG effort is over

    24/7 running quiet and nice

  7. #82
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,264
    sorry gmat, fixed up..

    So many results to post this update, got a bit muddled.

    If I can ask a small favor of you guys, can you please format as per OP but without all the spacer lines would be really handy if you have time..

    [ Score-Nick-CPU-Mhz-Core/thread- Ram details if you want ]

    much appreciated..

    Couple of comments.

    Rubycon.. your 2000 extra pts came from the 2 extra cores!

    WOW @ Justin.Kerr . so close to 10K. congrats on a close 1st place there

    and finally, thanks to Lightning man for the first Thuban results.. you can do 6k!

  8. #83
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,196
    The three computers I use the most:
    Phenom X3

    E5200

    Core2Quad
    Last edited by Major_A; 05-10-2010 at 04:27 PM. Reason: Core2Quad Results Added
    C2Q Q9550 @ 4.03Ghz/4GB OCZ DDR 1066 @ 902Mhz /BFG GTX 260/Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P/2 X Samsung F1 1TB/Samsung F1 750GB/Samsung SH-S223Q/Corsair TX650/X-Fi Titanium Fata1ity/Swiftech H20-220/Logitech Z5300 Speakers/Samsung SyncMaster 2253BW Monitor/Win 7 Ultimate x64

  9. #84
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Home
    Posts
    215

    980X - 12Gb GMH-E

    Nice tracer, runs smooth, load @80%.

    Third run improved almost 1000 over second, that improved 500 over the first round.
    Third posted.
    (Improvement second on third seems to be a glitch of the memory - Got errors soon after, reseated the memory, and now 3-500 points gain first to second. More bring no real gain)

    Run7 improved to 8951



    Did several runs now, using same setup, different settings.
    Mem-tuning seems to be as relevant in improving scores, as high clocks.

    Works nice, and almost clock-equal to Linx for stability testing.
    Prime95 needs 1Mhz FSB less, to run stable with the same settings.

    Like it, this nifty little program
    Last edited by XII; 05-15-2010 at 03:12 AM. Reason: Did some more testing.
    REX4F - X79A-Sabertooth
    Noctua NH-D14 Pull-Pull NoiseBlocker PK3
    X3930 @4.5 - 1,325V
    X3860 @4.5 - 1,28V
    Geil Ultra+ 6x4 7-8-7-24@1814 1,65V Elpida???
    Gskill RJ-X 4x8 9-11-11 @2200 1,65V Sammy
    580 SLI




  10. #85
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Home
    Posts
    215
    Swapped mobo.
    RexIII - sofar on par with Classy.

    Again, great for quick stability testing. 1 click behind on LinX , 2 clicks behind on Prime95.
    REX4F - X79A-Sabertooth
    Noctua NH-D14 Pull-Pull NoiseBlocker PK3
    X3930 @4.5 - 1,325V
    X3860 @4.5 - 1,28V
    Geil Ultra+ 6x4 7-8-7-24@1814 1,65V Elpida???
    Gskill RJ-X 4x8 9-11-11 @2200 1,65V Sammy
    580 SLI




  11. #86
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    milwaukee
    Posts
    1,683
    heres an x6 result.. for lightman

    click for 1900x1200
    LEO!!!!
    amd phenom II x6 1100T | gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 . .
    2x2gb g.skill 2133c8 | 128gb g.skill falcon ssd
    sapphire ati 5850 | x-fi xtrememusic. . .
    samsung f4 2tb | samsung dvdrw . .
    corsair tx850w | windows 7 64-bit.
    ddc3.25 xspc restop | ek ltx | mc-tdx | BIP . .
    lycosa-g9-z2300 | 26" 1920x1200 lcd .

  12. #87
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    963
    i must of missed something with this bench... if its ray tracing ...why is there so much aliasing... i dont get it...

    doesnt ray tracing eradicate aliasing all together....???????????????

  13. #88
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    3,437
    Quote Originally Posted by purecain View Post
    i must of missed something with this bench... if its ray tracing ...why is there so much aliasing... i dont get it...

    doesnt ray tracing eradicate aliasing all together....???????????????
    No, it doesn't You need to supersample RT to get decent results.
    RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W

    RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU

    SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
    XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV

  14. #89
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Posts
    1,968
    Quote Originally Posted by purecain View Post
    i must of missed something with this bench... if its ray tracing ...why is there so much aliasing... i dont get it...

    doesnt ray tracing eradicate aliasing all together....???????????????
    no. ray tracing has the same problem because it determines visible surfaces in image precision (pixels) as opposed to object precision (primitives). from a mathematical view pixels are an x,y coordinate which are infinitesimally small but represent a finite area on a monitor. if you take one sample (a ray in this case) you are representing only one component of the information at that pixel.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •