wow, a train of new results hehe, I'll update shortly.
There should be absolutely no GPU usage, the bench is very sensitive to RAM Bandwidth, Cache (L3 speed), (so those uncore/CPU-NB clocks) so perhaps your other system isn't as fast there..?
rig in sig, 24/7 settings
9056
ran it with HT off same settings otherwise, and got 8431
Last edited by justin.kerr; 05-04-2010 at 01:27 PM.
Email/web browsing PC
MM Ascension case, 24/7 settings
Classified, 980x @ 4,525Mhz, HT on 1.39V
(3) ATI 5870's@ 1062Mhz
G skill perfect storm RAM s 6gb, 2,176 Mhz CAS 8
(4) intel x25m RAID 0
CPU loop, EK supreme HF, EK mobo block, 500MM bitspower res, 2 DDC 3.25's on XSPC top, 2 XSPC RX 360's, 1 XSPC RX 480, GPU loop, EK water blocks, with nickel backs, 2 swiftech mcr 320's, 500MM bitspower res, ddc 3.25, XSPC top all with 1850 RPM gentle typhoons
plus many other rigs.
Last edited by kl0012; 05-07-2010 at 01:45 AM.
Whoa MajorD, you mixed me up with Pyr0:
should be:----- #8 ---- 6460 - gmat -------------Intel Core i7 920--------- 3800Mhz -- 4/8-- DDR3-1810 8-8-8-24
and i'll try to post a new bench next week after the WCG effort is over----- #8 ---- 6460 - gmat -------------Intel Core i7 975EE------- 4142Mhz -- 4/8-- DDR3-2000 8-8-8-24
sorry gmat, fixed up..
So many results to post this update, got a bit muddled.
If I can ask a small favor of you guys, can you please format as per OP but without all the spacer lines would be really handy if you have time..
[ Score-Nick-CPU-Mhz-Core/thread- Ram details if you want ]
much appreciated..
Couple of comments.
Rubycon.. your 2000 extra pts came from the 2 extra cores!
WOW @ Justin.Kerr . so close to 10K. congrats on a close 1st place there
and finally, thanks to Lightning man for the first Thuban results.. you can do 6k!
Last edited by Major_A; 05-10-2010 at 04:27 PM. Reason: Core2Quad Results Added
C2Q Q9550 @ 4.03Ghz/4GB OCZ DDR 1066 @ 902Mhz /BFG GTX 260/Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P/2 X Samsung F1 1TB/Samsung F1 750GB/Samsung SH-S223Q/Corsair TX650/X-Fi Titanium Fata1ity/Swiftech H20-220/Logitech Z5300 Speakers/Samsung SyncMaster 2253BW Monitor/Win 7 Ultimate x64
Nice tracer, runs smooth, load @80%.
Third run improved almost 1000 over second, that improved 500 over the first round.
Third posted.
(Improvement second on third seems to be a glitch of the memory - Got errors soon after, reseated the memory, and now 3-500 points gain first to second. More bring no real gain)
Run7 improved to 8951
Did several runs now, using same setup, different settings.
Mem-tuning seems to be as relevant in improving scores, as high clocks.
Works nice, and almost clock-equal to Linx for stability testing.
Prime95 needs 1Mhz FSB less, to run stable with the same settings.
Like it, this nifty little program
Swapped mobo.
RexIII - sofar on par with Classy.
Again, great for quick stability testing. 1 click behind on LinX , 2 clicks behind on Prime95.
LEO!!!! amd phenom II x6 1100T | gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 . . 2x2gb g.skill 2133c8 | 128gb g.skill falcon ssd sapphire ati 5850 | x-fi xtrememusic. . . samsung f4 2tb | samsung dvdrw . . corsair tx850w | windows 7 64-bit. ddc3.25 xspc restop | ek ltx | mc-tdx | BIP . . lycosa-g9-z2300 | 26" 1920x1200 lcd .
i must of missed something with this bench... if its ray tracing ...why is there so much aliasing... i dont get it...
doesnt ray tracing eradicate aliasing all together....???????????????
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV
no. ray tracing has the same problem because it determines visible surfaces in image precision (pixels) as opposed to object precision (primitives). from a mathematical view pixels are an x,y coordinate which are infinitesimally small but represent a finite area on a monitor. if you take one sample (a ray in this case) you are representing only one component of the information at that pixel.
Bookmarks