Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Stuck CPU temp sensor or what?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    685

    Stuck CPU temp sensor or what?

    Hi!

    I assembled test loop on the table to overclock the CPU and faced strange thing.
    My loop order is: TC PA140.3 + Yates @1100rpm -> EK Res -> DDC1T pump -> Watercool Heatkiller Rev. 3



    But take a look at this:
    This one is made at 27°C ambient, coretemp and realtemp show 38/36°C Idle:


    Second one is made at 20°C ambient - all temps such as NB, SB, Motherboard are obviously lower, but CPU is still at 38/36°C Idle:


    Also if I increase rpms on the rad fans to 1500, CPU temps don't move lower than 38/36°C.
    Under load temps go higher.
    I am running Win7 build 7100.

    So, is it something wrong with sensor? What can I do to fix this?

    thanks in advance.
    Worklog: Project Black Copper
    Lian Li PC-P80 | Thermochill PA140.3 | Noiseblocker fans | mdpc-x stuff

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    xUSSR
    Posts
    288
    say it here, unclewebb MAN

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,785
    What does your TJmax reading say in CoreTemp/Real Temp?

    Also, if you underclock and/or undervolt your CPU what temps can you achieve?

    Typically the loop should go Res -> Pump -> rad -> CPU but I doubt the way you have it setup is adding much heat load. Unless you have an iwaki pump or a ac120 pump that is direct drive, because those can add quite a bit of heat load. Still you would experience some temp fluctuations so... Maybe it is stuck? I had an e8400 that would never drop below 20c, even when the temp probe read -15c. So stuck sensors can happen although my hunch is that your TJmax is being read wrong.
    Current: AMD Threadripper 1950X @ 4.2GHz / EK Supremacy/ 360 EK Rad, EK-DBAY D5 PWM, 32GB G.Skill 3000MHz DDR4, AMD Vega 64 Wave, Samsung nVME SSDs
    Prior Build: Core i7 7700K @ 4.9GHz / Apogee XT/120.2 Magicool rad, 16GB G.Skill 3000MHz DDR4, AMD Saphire rx580 8GB, Samsung 850 Pro SSD

    Intel 4.5GHz LinX Stable Club

    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    685
    Quote Originally Posted by Factotum View Post
    say it here, unclewebb MAN
    Is that an issue of realtemp?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vinas View Post
    What does your TJmax reading say in CoreTemp/Real Temp?
    If saying about realtemp I guess it is set to 100c (it was by default in Settings -> Advanced Calibration Settings)
    Is that right?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vinas View Post
    Also, if you underclock and/or undervolt your CPU what temps can you achieve?
    Asus MB undervolts and lowers multiplier in auto mode, so it is running at 1.1v 333x6.0 as you can see in CPU-Z.
    Temps stay 38/36c

    Quote Originally Posted by Vinas View Post
    Typically the loop should go Res -> Pump -> rad -> CPU but I doubt the way you have it setup is adding much heat load. Unless you have an iwaki pump or a ac120 pump that is direct drive, because those can add quite a bit of heat load. Still you would experience some temp fluctuations so... Maybe it is stuck? I had an e8400 that would never drop below 20c, even when the temp probe read -15c. So stuck sensors can happen although my hunch is that your TJmax is being read wrong.
    yeah, this loop order is just for testing purposes. Anyway I can't believe that 7c drop in ambient temperature doesn't affect cores temperature

    Everest shows TJmax as 105c
    Worklog: Project Black Copper
    Lian Li PC-P80 | Thermochill PA140.3 | Noiseblocker fans | mdpc-x stuff

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,442
    Yes your core temp sensors are "stuck", most E8xxx series are in that they wont read below a certain amount, some wont read below 50C, some 40C, some 30C etc. But since you clearly dropped your ambients (per mb temps) and core temps did not go lower that pretty much shows it. both my E8400 and E8500 had some lower limit, as most E8xxx series do, worst I saw was a few "stuck" after reaching mid 50's. In fact if your E8xxx was not stuck at some temp, that would be unusual for that cpu.

    No there is nothing you can do about it, although new i7 processors per intel are more accurate across whole range and do not bottom out like most E8xxx series core temps.

    And tjmax for E8xxx series is 100C per intel, and that one is not in dispute. If you get a recent version of everest (you have a very old one) it will show tjmax 100.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    685
    rge
    Thanks for the explanation, didn't ever heard about that before
    Worklog: Project Black Copper
    Lian Li PC-P80 | Thermochill PA140.3 | Noiseblocker fans | mdpc-x stuff

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •