Page 17 of 29 FirstFirst ... 71415161718192027 ... LastLast
Results 401 to 425 of 719

Thread: AMD cuts to the core with 'Bulldozer' Opterons

  1. #401
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by w0mbat View Post
    1. its not outside amd
    2. im not marketing
    3. even the idea that i could get a cam near the system to make any pics is crazy, yet ss...
    4. opposing to JF, i heard that bd samples are not like yetis these days. but hes right that everything bd is 2011 for amd
    (well, mc was not q1 2010 too so i dont know if they are ahead of schedule or not)

    and from now on i wont comment on this again cause i feel a certain string around my neck, dresdenboy just told me to stop doing it too and i always value his comments. so blame him if u want too ;-)
    Because you didn't post for several days, i was already thinking you were another corpse in the ganges

    Fair enough, soo, can you say if BD will work in current Am3 boards?

  2. #402
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hiding under a blanky with a flash light
    Posts
    192
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnJohn View Post
    can you say if BD will work in current Am3 boards?
    That is the $1,000,000 question.

    And JF-AMD is going to tell us one way or another.

  3. #403
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Wasn't it mentioned already that BD would? As long as VRM is good enough and there is a BIOS update supplied...
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  4. #404
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ace Deuce, Michigan
    Posts
    3,955
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Wasn't it mentioned already that BD would? As long as VRM is good enough and there is a BIOS update supplied...
    Not current boards, I do not believe it was ever stated it would.

    We're talking a completely new architecture. Similar to how core 2 and p4 both worked on lga 775, but only p965 and newer actually supported conroe. Should bd fit in AM3, we'll probably need a new chipset, not just a new bios.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post

    JF-AMD posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (interrupt by Movieman)


    Regards, Hans

  5. #405
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    846
    Quote Originally Posted by BatteryOperated View Post
    That is the $1,000,000 question.

    And JF-AMD is going to tell us one way or another.
    JF is a server guy. I can only speak to G34 and C32. Both will support Bulldozer with no modification at all.
    While I work for AMD, my posts are my own opinions.

    http://blogs.amd.com/work/author/jfruehe/

  6. #406
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    970
    Quote Originally Posted by AliG View Post
    Not current boards, I do not believe it was ever stated it would.

    We're talking a completely new architecture. Similar to how core 2 and p4 both worked on lga 775, but only p965 and newer actually supported conroe. Should bd fit in AM3, we'll probably need a new chipset, not just a new bios.

    I guess 8 series chipset could support BD;
    if in this case, probably, motherboard that could support 140W TDP processor could support BD with BIOS update only
    Main Rig:
    Processor & Motherboard:AMD Ryzen5 1400 ' Gigabyte B450M-DS3H
    Random Access Memory Module:Adata XPG DDR4 3000 MHz 2x8GB
    Graphic Card:XFX RX 580 4GB
    Power Supply Unit:FSP AURUM 92+ Series PT-650M
    Storage Unit:Crucial MX 500 240GB SATA III SSD
    Processor Heatsink Fan:AMD Wraith Spire RGB
    Chasis:Thermaltake Level 10GTS Black

  7. #407
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,445
    i believe that it is the am3r2 that will support the BD's.
    [MOBO] Asus CrossHair Formula 5 AM3+
    [GPU] ATI 6970 x2 Crossfire 2Gb
    [RAM] G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB (4 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 1600
    [CPU] AMD FX-8120 @ 4.8 ghz
    [COOLER] XSPC Rasa 750 RS360 WaterCooling
    [OS] Windows 8 x64 Enterprise
    [HDD] OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD
    [AUDIO] Logitech S-220 17 Watts 2.1

  8. #408
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ace Deuce, Michigan
    Posts
    3,955
    Quote Originally Posted by haylui View Post

    I guess 8 series chipset could support BD;
    if in this case, probably, motherboard that could support 140W TDP processor could support BD with BIOS update only
    Doubtful if BD debuts in 2011. Think about it this way, the 8 series chipset must have been finalized at least 6-8 months ago to be launched around now. More than likely the 9 series (or whatever AMD calls it) will be required
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post

    JF-AMD posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (interrupt by Movieman)


    Regards, Hans

  9. #409
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by BatteryOperated View Post
    That is the $1,000,000 question.

    And JF-AMD is going to tell us one way or another.
    I thought AMD was going to move to a BGA package for dozer, like corei7
    Phenom II X4 955 C3 @3.6, Asus M4A78T-E,
    4gb OCZ Reaper , MSI 5770 HAWK @ 1000/1350 1.20v
    Corasir H50 cooling, HAF 932, Kingston 40gb SSD

  10. #410
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    312
    Quote Originally Posted by AliG View Post
    Not current boards, I do not believe it was ever stated it would.

    We're talking a completely new architecture. Similar to how core 2 and p4 both worked on lga 775, but only p965 and newer actually supported conroe. Should bd fit in AM3, we'll probably need a new chipset, not just a new bios.
    Yes but you are talking Intel who just wants more money and will design a new socket everytime just to make you spend more money so you can use the latest hardware. It was stated it will use the AM3 socket, but whether it will work on our current motherboards or not is another story we have not heard yet.

  11. #411
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by =SOC= Admiral View Post
    Yes but you are talking Intel who just wants more money and will design a new socket everytime just to make you spend more money so you can use the latest hardware. It was stated it will use the AM3 socket, but whether it will work on our current motherboards or not is another story we have not heard yet.
    what good is a compatible socket if you still have to buy another mother board anyways?
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  12. #412
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    970
    Quote Originally Posted by =SOC= Admiral View Post
    Yes but you are talking Intel who just wants more money and will design a new socket everytime just to make you spend more money so you can use the latest hardware. It was stated it will use the AM3 socket, but whether it will work on our current motherboards or not is another story we have not heard yet.
    If BD is using AM3 but can't be use on current AM3 board, it would be very very confusing to end users;
    To me it is sound like: This AM3 is NOT that AM3!!!!!
    Main Rig:
    Processor & Motherboard:AMD Ryzen5 1400 ' Gigabyte B450M-DS3H
    Random Access Memory Module:Adata XPG DDR4 3000 MHz 2x8GB
    Graphic Card:XFX RX 580 4GB
    Power Supply Unit:FSP AURUM 92+ Series PT-650M
    Storage Unit:Crucial MX 500 240GB SATA III SSD
    Processor Heatsink Fan:AMD Wraith Spire RGB
    Chasis:Thermaltake Level 10GTS Black

  13. #413
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,366
    Quote Originally Posted by haylui View Post
    If BD is using AM3 but can't be use on current AM3 board, it would be very very confusing to end users;
    To me it is sound like: This AM3 is NOT that AM3!!!!!
    Then it may be named AM3+. Many AM2 boards didn't work with AM2+ cpus. I see no problem here...

  14. #414
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    312
    What I would like to see is a socket like the ones on the server boards and intels boards. At least that way we no longer have to worry about bending the blasted pins. Anyone else agree.

  15. #415
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by haylui View Post
    If BD is using AM3 but can't be use on current AM3 board, it would be very very confusing to end users;
    To me it is sound like: This AM3 is NOT that AM3!!!!!
    AM3 is AM3. Bulldozer will work in nowadays socket AM3 mobos. Just a proper BIOS will be required. So it will only depend on the mobo manufacturers.
    -

  16. #416
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Space
    Posts
    769
    Quote Originally Posted by Oliverda View Post
    AM3 is AM3. Bulldozer will work in nowadays socket AM3 mobos. Just a proper BIOS will be required. So it will only depend on the mobo manufacturers.

    Got a link to that. Would be nice to see it somewhere else as proof.

  17. #417
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    244
    Quote Originally Posted by Motiv View Post
    Got a link to that. Would be nice to see it somewhere else as proof.
    At least BD will work in RD890 mobos.

  18. #418
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by Motiv View Post
    Got a link to that. Would be nice to see it somewhere else as proof.
    Here is the latest official AMD roadmap:



    Is it enough?
    -

  19. #419
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Bulldozer(Orochi) is AM3 compatible .This is official since last Analyst Day. AM3 compatible means AM3 compatible,no hidden meanings etc. One thing people will need is BIOS support.
    Last edited by informal; 02-24-2010 at 06:15 AM.

  20. #420
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    846
    Quote Originally Posted by AliG View Post
    Doubtful if BD debuts in 2011. Think about it this way, the 8 series chipset must have been finalized at least 6-8 months ago to be launched around now. More than likely the 9 series (or whatever AMD calls it) will be required
    Bulldozer is supported by the server chipsets (SR5600 series) that are shipping today. You could drop it into the new Magny Cours platforms with a BIOS update.
    While I work for AMD, my posts are my own opinions.

    http://blogs.amd.com/work/author/jfruehe/

  21. #421
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,366
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Bulldozer(Orochi) is AM3 compatible .This is official since last Analyst Day. AM3 compatible means AM3 compatible,no hidden meanings etc. One thing people will need is BIOS support.
    I doubt that this is a good thing. Generally this means that we wont see more mem chanels or faster HT...

  22. #422
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by kl0012 View Post
    I doubt that this is a good thing. Generally this means that we wont see more mem chanels or faster HT...
    Exactly because more mem channels and faster HT are not necessary on desktop.

    Btw the AM3 socket itself doesn't limit the HT link speed. It could be easily faster with AM3.
    Last edited by Oliverda; 02-24-2010 at 07:49 AM.
    -

  23. #423
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by kl0012 View Post
    I doubt that this is a good thing. Generally this means that we wont see more mem chanels or faster HT...
    Why isn't it a good thing? You won't see sky-high sisoft sadra mem benchmark ? On desktop 3 or more channels are useless even for an 8 core chip as Orochi. 2 channels of DDR3 @ 1600Mhz (jedec standard) is perfect. Why do you need higher HT link speed ?? HyperTransport 3 is MORE than enough for any desktop chip,you won't see any benefit from higher HT link speed since HT speed is decoupled from IMC speed on any modern(post K8/9 design from AMD). I say the compatibility with AM3 socket is a great thing,it keeps the cost for validation and testing down(CPU only level ,since chipset is validated) and partners love this(keeps their RnD costs down). Not to mention it's great for end users too .

    For 8+ cores AMD will probably go for MCM even on desktop so quadchannel is a given ,but for 2011 Orochi will do just fine.

  24. #424
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    JF already said quad channel for BD :/ ??? lol the IMC could use a speed up date to support more mhz on the ram, since 10h is limited to around 1800mhz.

    I haven't seen an I7 running 6-6-6-18 1800mhz yet though lol sure they run 2250 and some 2400mhz, it's only 25% more mhz.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  25. #425
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    wacth at uncore Phenoms....Phenom 3.2 GHz with 2500/2600MHz uncore have average performance as Phenom 3400MHz and default uncore. Think, Bulldozer will compactible with AMD800 chipset and primaliry for AM3+.
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

Page 17 of 29 FirstFirst ... 71415161718192027 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •