These graphs were originally posted in a forum by a guy with the user name of "successful troll". I'm surprised guru3d made an article of this crap.
These graphs were originally posted in a forum by a guy with the user name of "successful troll". I'm surprised guru3d made an article of this crap.
it was fun while it lasted.
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...8&postcount=65
Some people were expecting Asus mars performance(SLI gtx 285 2gb) or better, from a single 5870.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...8&postcount=65
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
I would invite you guys to look at past Nvidia press decks which have been posted again and again. It will be obvious that these are not from an official NVIDIA deck.
I am sure it is getting them a massive number of hits regardless of the validity. Mission successful.These graphs were originally posted in a forum by a guy with the user name of "successful troll". I'm surprised guru3d made an article of this crap.
Normally nVidia graphs don't show fps but have a (ATI) baseline (1) and compare there card against it. Like this 1
Last edited by blob; 12-13-2009 at 01:36 PM.
Only a successful troll would do such a thing
I must admit it is annoying that these are fake, I was hoping that we finally had some sort of REAL indication as to what the Fermi would perform like... but alas some troll has flopped out his powerpoint and fabricated a load of nonsense
Stop looking at the walls, look out the window
Phenon II x4 955 (3.7ghz)/athlon II x2 245 (3.7ghz), Mugen 2 , gigabyte 790xt ud4p, 5770 1000/1420 , 4GB ddr3
http://superclock.mysmf.com 5770 1ghz bench
evga failed
Indeed :S
Makes you wonder whether they knew it was fake but posted the "news" just to get hits
Stop looking at the walls, look out the window
I find it entertaining the fact that 5h after this was posted, almost 100 replies.
Core i7 920 D0 B-batch (4.1) (Kinda Stable?) | DFI X58 T3eH8 (Fed up with its' issues, may get a new board soon) | Patriot 1600 (9-9-9-24) (for now) | XFX HD 4890 (971/1065) (for now) |
80GB X25-m G2 | WD 640GB | PCP&C 750 | Dell 2408 LCD | NEC 1970GX LCD | Win7 Pro | CoolerMaster ATCS 840 {Modded to reverse-ATX, WC'ing internal}
CPU Loop: MCP655 > HK 3.0 LT > ST 320 (3x Scythe G's) > ST Res >Pump
GPU Loop: MCP655 > MCW-60 > PA160 (1x YL D12SH) > ST Res > BIP 220 (2x YL D12SH) >Pump
Well for April these numbers minus about 10 or 20 percent are expected. I don't believe the TDP for a second though. If the TDP is even close to being true then all the wait would have been worth it. Somehow I really doubt it and as someone else these new GPUs are being optimized for GPU computing.
Whatever said and done it seems Nvidia this round sacrificed some competitiveness to work on a new architecture that will hopefully help out a lot for the next round. ATi took the short term strategy of just refreshing its parts.
If I had anything to say, I'd say that Nvidia chose the right time to make its jump given the current state of the economy anyway. This was a good round to take short term losses in. Besides I like it when a company does something that is forward thinking in a climate where all incentives are for businesses to act for the short term.
In the end it all averages out. I think ATI will need to do a major revamp after the next round of refreshes. I'm sure its already being worked on.
I was and still expecting that. I think 5870 drivers are still too early and not enough optimizations have been made. Eventually I think 5870 will surpass HD 4890 CF performance but that will take time. Just look at GTX 280 when it was first released. In real world gaming tests by [H] at first it had trouble delivering better performance then 9800GX2 in Crysis. Nowadays GTX 280 is notably ahead.
Hahaha...successful troll is successful.
--lapped Q9650 #L828A446 @ 4.608, 1.45V bios, 1.425V load.
-- NH-D14 2x Delta AFB1212SHE push/pull and 110 cfm fan -- Coollaboratory Liquid PRO
-- Gigabyte EP45-UD3P ( F10 ) - G.Skill 4x2Gb 9600 PI @ 1221 5-5-5-15, PL8, 2.1V
- GTX 480 ( 875/1750/928)
- HAF 932 - Antec TPQ 1200 -- Crucial C300 128Gb boot --
Primary Monitor - Samsung T260
If it was real it would be like the former slides, i.e. %5 difference in FPS accounts for %50 difference in the bar lengths
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
EVGA X58 SLI Classified E759 Limited Edition
Intel Core i7 Extreme 980X Gulftown six-core
Thermalright TRUE Copper w/ 2x Noctua NF-P12s (push-pull)
2x EVGA GeForce GTX 590 Classified [Quad-SLI]
6GB Mushkin XP Series DDR3 1600MHz 7-8-7-20
SilverStone Strider ST1500 1500W
OCZ RevoDrive 3 240GB 1.0GB/s PCI-Express SSD
Creative X-Fi Fatal1ty Professional / Logitech G51 5.1 Surround
SilverStone Raven RV02
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 RTM
IF anyone is honestly going to believe that nVidia is being legit about this you're lieing to yourself.
We're talking about the same company who tells you that the 8800 GT, 9800 GT and GTX 250 are entirely different cards.
eXt 4
Intel Core i5 2500k @ 5GHz | Asus Maximus GENE-Z | Corsair Vengence 16GB DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 | eVga GTX 580 SC 1000/2300 | SeaSonic Platinum Platinum-860 | Corsir Force GT 60GB/WD Green 1.5TB
XSPC dual bay res w/ Laing D5/ XSPC Raystorm CPU Block / EK-FC580 GTX+ GPU block / XSPC RX240 / XSPC RX360 / All Yate D12Sm-12 Fans / NZXT case
St0rage
AMD Phenom II 965 @ 3.6GHz | Gigabyte MA785G-UD3H | Corsair XMS 8GB DDR2-1066 | 785G integrated | Corsiar TX 750 | WD Green 2.0TB
Thermalright VenomousX, ALL Yate D12SL-12 FANS
Phenon II x4 955 (3.7ghz)/athlon II x2 245 (3.7ghz), Mugen 2 , gigabyte 790xt ud4p, 5770 1000/1420 , 4GB ddr3
http://superclock.mysmf.com 5770 1ghz bench
evga failed
Bookmarks