Nice try nvidia lol
Phenon II x4 955 (3.7ghz)/athlon II x2 245 (3.7ghz), Mugen 2 , gigabyte 790xt ud4p, 5770 1000/1420 , 4GB ddr3
http://superclock.mysmf.com 5770 1ghz bench
evga failed
if the 5950 get out before fermi I am buying the 5950. Nice attemp st sabotaging the competition nvidia lol.
Phenon II x4 955 (3.7ghz)/athlon II x2 245 (3.7ghz), Mugen 2 , gigabyte 790xt ud4p, 5770 1000/1420 , 4GB ddr3
http://superclock.mysmf.com 5770 1ghz bench
evga failed
The reality is that Fermi is coming out 6 months or more after the HD5800 series, so it has to have better performance or otherwise it will be a BIG OLE FAIL. As far as the numbers go, I can see these being plausible, especially on games that favor Nvidia, which is probably why these were used. Notice that there isn't any DX11 comparison in there and that would have been just as easy. As I stated already, Fermi should beat the HD5800 series, but they first have to get them on the shelves and they better be ready for a price war. I guarantee that as soon as Fermi is released the HD5800 series will drop in price to $199 (5850), $299 (5870) and $399 (5970). They raised the prices up and have been careful with the supply to keep inline with keeping demand high, this will allow them to make those price cuts when the time comes.
CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165
Desk Build
FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage
W/C System
(CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.
Nah, totally nonsense.
Perf/W from GT300 would have to be utterly amazing compared to Evergreen which will never happen (we never had this difference before) as they rely on TSMC.
We can expect 30% gain from GTX295, which could get nearly to 5970 with an "Ultra" model. Obviously those massive gains from Evergreen are impossible, as we never had such difference between same gen. cards.
The tomshardware slides are totally fake, fermi will most likely come in 786MB and 1.5GB of memory... AFAIK fermi has 6 memory controllers so 256*6=1.5gb
Coming Soon
Nice if true. But I want to see benchmarks from an objective 3rd party. If these are marketing slides from nvidia or just the creation of a fanboy, they certainly don't come from an objective source.
They need something to counter Eyefinity because we already have plenty of power in 295/5970.When crysis 2,lost planet 2 and games like Battlefield 3 come The 6 series will be among us.With better Eyefinity support.I've also read that Simbin is working on a new title,unless Nvidia is giving away Triple Head 2 Go with their cards,I don't see them having the upperhand.
These are old and fake. Saw these on OCuk like 2-3 days ago. Nothing new.
The results for the 5800's are also questionable in this fake benchmark. A 5870 gets over 100 fps at those settings in RE5 for example.
Thread should be closed imo. Until we get benchmarks from actual sources like Nvidia themselves, then this is all just nothing but hype.
Last edited by Vit^pr0n; 12-13-2009 at 10:49 AM.
faster than 5970= more expensive than 5970
they could get away with selling this thing at $650, maybe even more if ati doesnt cut 5970 prices
Last edited by grimREEFER; 12-13-2009 at 11:00 AM.
DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis
Does Nvidia usually publish their slides in jpeg format or PNG?
absolutely fake. Fermi is a single card and what'll it TDP be? 200W? You can't beat a 300W card with a 200W one at the same node. It just doesn't make sense.
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Obviously you could, but it would have to be INCREDIBLY efficient in comparison to ATI's current architecture. And from what we hear about optimization towards GPGPU, I don't see that happening.
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
SweClockers.com
CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
GPU: HD 5770
This reminds me of the hype just before G80 and then it actually turned to be true.
1.8GB and 2GB sounds like a lot of memory for GPUs today but NVIDIA usually pushes the capacity to new heights for a new gen, 768MB for a 8800GTX was an insane amount when it was released as well.
However one thing I can't simply believe in is the power efficiency, either the TDP is very inaccurately given as to what realworld figures would show or these numbers are just made up. As for performance, it's definitely looks a bit too positive but not totally impossible but due to the respins/delays, I'm really doubtful. If performance figures would be accurate nvidia could charge like $699 and $599 respectively unless ATI would adjust prices, that alone says a lot...
Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs
If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place
For me, it's pretty much 100% fake for a simple reason: NVIDIA PR dude said "Dual Fermi coming soon".
If GTX 380 is in a position to compete against HD 5970, NVIDIA wouldn't have to rush a dual Fermi out so soon.
The performance would be insane if true but that would also mean fermi would probably have to be clocking like a beast or have specs beyond what we currently assume which seems doubtful to me.
I would expect it to be faster than the 5870 but it seems to be reaching for it to surpass the 5970 in situations where crossfire implementation is working.
Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810
Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830
AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
Corsair VX450
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
I think its very plausible, but the source is dubious. So I agree with anyone professional and take this with a huge grain of salt.
Honestly everyone expected and believed the 5870 was going to have perfect crossfire scaling of 4890s i.e exactly twice the performance of the 4890 series, I don't think a single person on this board doubted that. I though it was going to have perfect CF scaling and when the card came out and it didn't, I was let down and didn't want to purchase a 58xx anymore. When the 5970 came out, I was even more let down because from AMD slides, I was expecting significantly better performance. But the increase in price and decrease in performance, really made me not want to buy the card anymore.
When benchmarks essentially claim the same thing, but from NV, people are claiming it is too fast, it impossible, even when fermi specs, indicate, it has more than twice the shaders, those shaders are 16% faster and on top of this, its a new architecture.
So why do people believe it when it comes to AMD perfect CF scaling is possible, but from NV, it can't be, its impossible, when specs and a change in architecture indicate the NV scenario is more likely to be true?
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=233621
Heres the original thread.
Last edited by tajoh111; 12-13-2009 at 11:55 AM.
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
Bookmarks