Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: 4890 @ 1000/1150 vs 5870 def in CRYSIS WARHEAD,1920 x 1200, DX10, 4xAA, Enthusiat !!

  1. 10-07-2009, 03:16 AM #1
    Gaul
    Gaul is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038

    4890 @ 1000/1150 vs 5870 def in CRYSIS WARHEAD,1920 x 1200, DX10, 4xAA, Enthusiat !!

    RIG 4890

    -e2160 @ 3.85 GH
    -4 GB
    -ASUS P5Q
    -tx 850w

    RIG 5870

    -e84 @ 4 GH
    -4 GB
    -ASUS P5Q
    -tx 850w

    4890 @ 1000/1150



    5870 DEF



    5870 OC @ 900/1300



    WELL remember only personal versus/review
    Last edited by Gaul; 10-07-2009 at 03:21 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-08-2009, 09:24 AM #2
    miahallen
    miahallen is offline
    World Champion - IRONMODS
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Northern Japan
    Posts
    2,029
    Send a message via MSN to miahallen
    How are we supposed to compare those results??? The CPU needs to be the same on both rigs to give us a reasonable apple-to-apples comparison
    Quote Originally Posted by Massman
    My definition of 'efficient' is 'it does not suck monkeyballs'. Yes, I set bars low.
    [CENTER]The post counter is not an intelligence meter!

    MAX11L - "It's like a console...with the suck turned down and the awesome turned up" -tet5uo
    Heat Team IRONMODS
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-08-2009, 09:29 AM #3
    SoulsCollective
    SoulsCollective is offline
    L-l-look at you, hacker.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    4,644
    I'm a little confused about that too. Given that the rest of the two systems are the same, right down to PSU, I'm assuming that this is the same PC with different graphics cards used - in which case, why change the CPU and stuff up the results?
    Rig specs
    CPU: i7 5960X Mobo: Asus X99 Deluxe RAM: 4x4GB G.Skill DDR4-2400 CAS-15 VGA: 2x eVGA GTX680 Superclock PSU: Corsair AX1200

    Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-08-2009, 01:24 PM #4
    YuDi IzzY
    YuDi IzzY is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    17
    Send a message via Yahoo to YuDi IzzY
    maybe the TS just want to share with us the perform 5870 with his RIG...
    AMD X4 B50 Processor @3,8Ghz dailly work
    DFI 790GX-M3H5
    G-SKILL RIP JAWS 2x2GB PC12800 DDR3
    SUNBEAM CORE CONTACT 120 w/ DATECH 3600Rpm
    XIGMATEX NRP 750W
    DIGITAL ALLIANCE 4890 SONIC EDITION 1GB GDDR5
    LCD GTC 19" 1440*900 @60Hz
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-08-2009, 01:38 PM #5
    Scubar
    Scubar is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    1,838
    this thread should be called.

    E2160 @ 3.8Ghz vs E8400 @ 4.00Ghz

    The difference in speed and cache is going to make a difference in the results. Youd be surprised just how much too.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-09-2009, 03:42 AM #6
    Gaul
    Gaul is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by YuDi IzzY View Post
    maybe the TS just want to share with us the perform 5870 with his RIG...
    yup...once again share only...no-offence
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-09-2009, 04:02 AM #7
    ShArKo
    ShArKo is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Buenos Aires - Argentina
    Posts
    438
    Send a message via MSN to ShArKo
    Quote Originally Posted by YuDi IzzY View Post
    maybe the TS just want to share with us the perform 5870 with his RIG...
    Yea, well if he want´s to show as the performance of a 5870 he must do it with the same CPU, Mobo, memory. Theres a big difference between a E2160 and E8400...
    Intel C2D E8400 @ 4Ghz // Asus Maximus Formula x38 @ FSB 500Mhz// G.Skill Pi 2x2GB 1000Mhz // 9800GTX+ SSC eVGA // WD Raptor X 150GB + Samsung Spinpoint 2TB // DVD-RW DL Asus // Powercooler 850W // CM Cosmos S // Samsung T260N / Edifier R251 // Logitech G9 // Logitech G15 Rev2

    Cooling System: Swiftech Apex Ultra H2O Kit + MCW60
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-09-2009, 05:28 AM #8
    Gaul
    Gaul is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by ShArKo View Post
    Yea, well if he want´s to show as the performance of a 5870 he must do it with the same CPU, Mobo, memory. Theres a big difference between a E2160 and E8400...
    well, i have backup, same setting except CPU, Q66 @ 3.8 GH.
    anyway still BIG difference between e84 @ 4GH and Q66 @ 3.8 GH ?

    Q66@3.8 GH + 4890 @ 950/1150

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-09-2009, 05:38 AM #9
    ShArKo
    ShArKo is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Buenos Aires - Argentina
    Posts
    438
    Send a message via MSN to ShArKo
    Well Gaul I think if you want to show as the performance of the 5870 you gotta use the same hardware (mobo, mem, cpu). The performance of the Q6600 and E8400 are very similar, but some people can say that is not a just comparison....
    Intel C2D E8400 @ 4Ghz // Asus Maximus Formula x38 @ FSB 500Mhz// G.Skill Pi 2x2GB 1000Mhz // 9800GTX+ SSC eVGA // WD Raptor X 150GB + Samsung Spinpoint 2TB // DVD-RW DL Asus // Powercooler 850W // CM Cosmos S // Samsung T260N / Edifier R251 // Logitech G9 // Logitech G15 Rev2

    Cooling System: Swiftech Apex Ultra H2O Kit + MCW60
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-10-2009, 09:36 PM #10
    Gaul
    Gaul is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by ShArKo View Post
    Q6600 and E8400 are very similar, but some people can say that is not a just comparison....
    OK, no big deal, it's personal comparision....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-12-2009, 02:44 AM #11
    Gaul
    Gaul is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by ShArKo View Post
    Well Gaul I think if you want to show as the performance of the 5870 you gotta use the same hardware (mobo, mem, cpu). The performance of the Q6600 and E8400 are very similar, but some people can say that is not a just comparison....
    well, we must start learn this articel.......

    http://www.guru3d.com/article/cpu-sc...e-processors/9

    according that ones :

    Last edited by Gaul; 11-14-2009 at 08:14 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 11-07-2009, 04:29 AM #12
    deaffob
    deaffob is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    111
    and with Q6600 you used 1400 resolution. ofcourse you get higher result with Q6600 try it with 1900 resolution enthusiast again
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 11-17-2009, 12:40 AM #13
    Onoff312
    Onoff312 is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    245
    Looks to me like even with if it did have the same hardware the 5870 is not that great for a double spec improvment in Shaders over the 4890.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 11-17-2009, 02:39 AM #14
    westsider
    westsider is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    170
    cpu must be equal too
    E21XX isnt equal to E8XX
    My DDR2 Results:
    Cellshock GMH 8500 2GB-1508MHz 2.74v vldt
    Cellshock GMH 8500 2GB-1398MHz 4-4-4-12 2.74v vldt
    Cellshock GMH 8500 2GB-973MHz 3-2-2-1 2.74v vldt
    Cellshock GMH 8500 2GB-1000MHz 3-4-3-5 3.25v SP1M
    Mushkin XP 8500 GMH 2GB-1300MHz 2.45v vldt
    OCZ Reaper 1200MHz PSC-1406MHz 2.28v vldt
    Dominator 8500 GKX 2GB-840MHz 3-2-2-1 2.5v vldt
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 11-17-2009, 05:07 PM #15
    \/icious
    \/icious is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    414
    Quote Originally Posted by westsider View Post
    cpu must be equal too
    E21XX isnt equal to E8XX
    I think this has been said enough times./\

    Thx for the comparison Gual. Something is better than nothing
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 11-20-2009, 01:48 PM #16
    Gaul
    Gaul is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by \/icious View Post
    I think this has been said enough times./\

    Thx for the comparison Gual. Something is better than nothing
    thanx...soon i'll post q9550 @ 4.25 GH + 5870.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 11-20-2009, 01:58 PM #17
    Leeghoofd
    Leeghoofd is offline
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    It amases me each time again that this is still being called a comparison... data is soooooo off... and then it's being called a personal review which makes it more valid ? C'mon...
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 11-21-2009, 03:53 PM #18
    Gaul
    Gaul is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeghoofd View Post
    It amases me each time again that this is still being called a comparison... data is soooooo off... and then it's being called a personal review which makes it more valid ? C'mon...
    MORE.........COMPARE

    Last edited by Gaul; 11-21-2009 at 03:55 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 11-21-2009, 05:13 PM #19
    XS2K
    XS2K is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    584
    Ontopic:OMFG the results are close,I will test with my 4890 @ 1050-1200 tommorow,congrats anyway.
    For the E2140 @ 3.8 is not E8400 @ 4.0 crowd other than getting the award for Captain Obvious! (well deserved you all earned it) you should look at CPU scaling for this game,since the differences are very small 2 FPS max between the 2 CPU's which makes it weird seeing that a card with double the hardware specs is only 6FPS or 4-5 (CPU bound) faster than 4890....
    Last edited by XS2K; 11-21-2009 at 05:16 PM.
    Before you complain about lag, think about Jesus. He lagged three days before respawning.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 11-21-2009, 08:06 PM #20
    kiwik
    kiwik is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    53
    Crapsis is such a bad benchmark tool anyway.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 11-22-2009, 01:12 AM #21
    Gaul
    Gaul is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by XS2K View Post
    Ontopic:OMFG the results are close,I will test with my 4890 @ 1050-1200 tommorow,congrats anyway.
    For the E2140 @ 3.8 is not E8400 @ 4.0 crowd other than getting the award for Captain Obvious! (well deserved you all earned it) you should look at CPU scaling for this game,since the differences are very small 2 FPS max between the 2 CPU's which makes it weird seeing that a card with double the hardware specs is only 6FPS or 4-5 (CPU bound) faster than 4890....
    thanx......yup, today i'll test with q9550 @ 3.4 GH
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 11-22-2009, 01:18 AM #22
    dan7777
    dan7777 is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    950
    So In That The 4890 Aint That Far Behind The 5870 I Knew That Card Was Over Hyped! Come On...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 11-22-2009, 02:28 AM #23
    Gaul
    Gaul is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by dan7777 View Post
    So In That The 4890 Aint That Far Behind The 5870 I Knew That Card Was Over Hyped! Come On...
    yes.....but 4890 OC @ 1000/1150 ...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 11-22-2009, 02:51 AM #24
    Leeghoofd
    Leeghoofd is offline
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    just make a chart comparing CPU / GPU / Resolution scaling instead of all these screenshots... there's no overview here... also use data of at least 3-5 runs and take the average...
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  25. 11-24-2009, 07:46 AM #25
    XS2K
    XS2K is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    584
    E 5200 @ 3.75Ghz and 4890 @ 1010-1150 28.31,will try some more OC later.
    Can someone with a 5870 try this test and tell us their results it just seems extremely weird that the gap is soo small between 4890 OC and 5870...

    Damned 200kb limit...

    Last edited by XS2K; 11-24-2009 at 07:50 AM.
    Before you complain about lag, think about Jesus. He lagged three days before respawning.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules