Page 1 of 9 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 288

Thread: HD 5700s pictures & benchmarks

Hybrid View

  1. 10-01-2009, 08:25 PM #1
    onethreehill
    onethreehill is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247

    HD 5700s pictures & benchmarks

    http://translate.google.nl/translate...istory_state0=
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-01-2009, 08:30 PM #2
    Smartidiot89
    Smartidiot89 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    I love you onetreehill!

    1120 shaders and 56 ROPs so it's true... damn that card is insane... Now I want someone to confirm prices
    Last edited by Smartidiot89; 10-01-2009 at 08:32 PM.
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-01-2009, 09:22 PM #3
    IDANPE
    IDANPE is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by Smartidiot89 View Post
    I love you onetreehill!

    1120 shaders and 56 ROPs so it's true... damn that card is insane... Now I want someone to confirm prices
    tmu man, 56 tmu..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-02-2009, 01:41 AM #4
    Smartidiot89
    Smartidiot89 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by IDANPE View Post
    tmu man, 56 tmu..
    Ok, ok I stand corrected
    Quote Originally Posted by IvanAndreevich View Post
    Performance doesn't look that impressive compared to the 4770.
    I have to agree on this...

    HD4770: 640 Shaders, 32 tmus, 750mhz GPU, 800mhz GDDR5 @ 128-bit
    HD5750: 1120 shaders, 56 tmus, 700mhz GPU, 1150mhz GDDR5 @ 128-bit

    Anyone else think that this has to be early driver issues? There is no way I can believe these synthetics are anywhere close to it's true performance, also the CPU used was a Dual-Core downclocked to 2GHz? I meen it's also competing against GTX260 and GTX275.

    HD5000 isn't scaling as it should... coult it be driver issues or something going on with the architecture reaching it's limit?
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-02-2009, 03:14 AM #5
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Smartidiot89 View Post
    Ok, ok I stand corrected

    I have to agree on this...

    HD4770: 640 Shaders, 32 tmus, 750mhz GPU, 800mhz GDDR5 @ 128-bit
    HD5750: 1120 shaders, 56 tmus, 700mhz GPU, 1150mhz GDDR5 @ 128-bit

    Anyone else think that this has to be early driver issues? There is no way I can believe these synthetics are anywhere close to it's true performance, also the CPU used was a Dual-Core downclocked to 2GHz? I meen it's also competing against GTX260 and GTX275.

    HD5000 isn't scaling as it should... coult it be driver issues or something going on with the architecture reaching it's limit?
    hmmmmm yes thats even more obvious than the 5870 to 4890 comparison...
    and then compare the 5750 to the 5850 and 5870... again there seems to be no real scaling from adding more blocks...

    really weird...
    could it be that the reworked dx11 cores are slower per clock than the previous ones? they must be notably slower though...
    i mean the 5750 is almost double the 4770 in specs...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-02-2009, 03:30 AM #6
    Smartidiot89
    Smartidiot89 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    hmmmmm yes thats even more obvious than the 5870 to 4890 comparison...
    and then compare the 5750 to the 5850 and 5870... again there seems to be no real scaling from adding more blocks...

    really weird...
    could it be that the reworked dx11 cores are slower per clock than the previous ones? they must be notably slower though...
    i mean the 5750 is almost double the 4770 in specs...
    My bet is driver issues and possibly that underclocked CPU... atleast I hope so. Waiting proper reviews, if this thing really is this bad it's a HD5850 for me...
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-02-2009, 06:25 AM #7
    Jamesrt2004
    Jamesrt2004 is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    3,433
    Send a message via MSN to Jamesrt2004
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    really weird...
    could it be that the reworked dx11 cores are slower per clock than the previous ones? they must be notably slower though...
    i mean the 5750 is almost double the 4770 in specs...
    cant be THAT much of a diff tbh cos honestly wasn't ati like 90% ready for dx11 anyways ?? and its pretty much the "same" core in a nutshell :/ so imo it should perfeorm vaguely the same...

    im oits the cpu.. who downclocks to 2ghz .. when most people benching with i7's at 4~4.2
    "Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is…"
    //James
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-07-2009, 12:28 PM #8
    initialised
    initialised is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toon
    Posts
    1,570
    Send a message via MSN to initialised
    Quote Originally Posted by Smartidiot89 View Post
    HD5000 isn't scaling as it should... coult it be driver issues or something going on with the architecture reaching it's limit?
    Hmm... I've see them bottlenecked by 3.75GHz i7 CPUs in some tests, so I think it is the platform that is the limitation not the GPU

    Quote Originally Posted by To(V)bo Co(V)bo View Post
    800SP boooooooooooo
    No reason to grab this over a 4890 really. They should of matched at the very least 4870 specs.
    Not while 4870s are still selling.

    Quote Originally Posted by w0mbat View Post


    Fake? Guess we'll find out on the 13th
    Last edited by initialised; 10-07-2009 at 12:33 PM.
    Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.67GHz
    ASUS 6T Deluxe
    Powercolor 7970 @ 1050/1475
    12GB GSkill Ripjaws
    Antec 850W TruePower Quattro
    50" Full HD PDP
    Red Cosmos 1000
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-07-2009, 12:33 PM #9
    To(V)bo Co(V)bo
    To(V)bo Co(V)bo is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Miltown, Wisconsin
    Posts
    353
    this 5770 isnt woth more than 120$, they can keep it
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-01-2009, 08:33 PM #10
    zerazax
    zerazax is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Wow 1120 SP's and 56 ROPs? That's going to be an awesome price/perf card
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-01-2009, 08:43 PM #11
    Bail_w
    Bail_w is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    2,819
    Dam, look at what that tiny thing can do. impressive...
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 10-01-2009, 08:43 PM #12
    [XC] gomeler
    [XC] gomeler is offline
    Diablo 3! Who's Excited?
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    9,412
    Send a message via AIM to [XC] gomeler
    Look at the size of that core! Harvested RV870 cores I take it? Should be a nice powerful midrange card and give AMD a nice $300-150 product portfolio.
    I want your HD 5970s and HD 5970 waterblocks.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 10-01-2009, 08:46 PM #13
    Smartidiot89
    Smartidiot89 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler View Post
    Look at the size of that core! Harvested RV870 cores I take it? Should be a nice powerful midrange card and give AMD a nice $300-150 product portfolio.
    As far as I know "RV870" cores are close to a perfect square... So I don't think it's harvested this is more vertical. But wasn't this card "Juniper" rumored to be 180mm2? Comparing the core to memory chips it does look 180mm2-ish unless my eyes are playing a trick on me?

    Looking forward to this card, now AMD price this thing "right". HD5850 already has a low price point, hoping $149 for HD5750!
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 10-02-2009, 12:46 AM #14
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler View Post
    Look at the size of that core! Harvested RV870 cores I take it? Should be a nice powerful midrange card and give AMD a nice $300-150 product portfolio.
    its juniper, not cypress...

    Quote Originally Posted by froste View Post
    Very true, $100 and $150 would a smoking deal... I guess they're trying to sell the DX11 and other new features, not just the performance
    yeah... makes some sense, but i agree, 150$ is too high considering this is the 5750 and not even 5770...

    first impression:
    EEEEWWWwwwWwwWWWWWwww!!!! god that heatsink sucks!

    second impression:
    nice little card... but half a slot exhaust, meh... and dualslot... why?

    third impression:
    synthetic performance is nice, a 4850 with dx11 basically... wonder how well retail cards will clock and how actual game performance will be...
    125$ would be a killer price, but 150$ is... acceptable...
    Last edited by saaya; 10-02-2009 at 12:52 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 10-02-2009, 12:56 AM #15
    LordEC911
    LordEC911 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    'Zona
    Posts
    2,346
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    its juniper, not cypress...

    yeah... makes some sense, but i agree, 150$ is too high considering this is the 5750 and not even 5770...

    first impression:
    EEEEWWWwwwWwwWWWWWwww!!!! god that heatsink sucks!

    second impression:
    nice little card... but half a slot exhaust, meh... and dualslot... why?

    third impression:
    synthetic performance is nice, a 4850 with dx11 basically... wonder how well retail cards will clock and how actual game performance will be...
    125$ would be a killer price, but 150$ is... acceptable...
    Not 4850... more like 4870.
    Originally Posted by motown_steve
    Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.

    Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 10-01-2009, 08:45 PM #16
    froste
    froste is offline
    Xtreme EV
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    108
    Nice, I wanna see how well the 5770 overclocks , might be my next card.
    "I only want to be known as the best ever......is that too much to ask?" - B.J. Penn
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 10-01-2009, 08:54 PM #17
    IvanAndreevich
    IvanAndreevich is offline
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    3,858
    Performance doesn't look that impressive compared to the 4770.
    i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
    Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60
    Quote Originally Posted by CompGeek
    The US is the only country that doesn't use [nuclear weapons] to terrorize other countries. The US is based on Christian values, unlike any other country in the world. Granted we are straying from our Christian heritage, but we still have a freedom aimed diplomatic stance.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 10-01-2009, 09:15 PM #18
    froste
    froste is offline
    Xtreme EV
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    108
    Quote Originally Posted by IvanAndreevich View Post
    Performance doesn't look that impressive compared to the 4770.
    I belive that was the 5750 in the benchmark, hopefully the 5770 has a pretty decent jump in performance. *crossing fingers*
    "I only want to be known as the best ever......is that too much to ask?" - B.J. Penn
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 10-01-2009, 09:17 PM #19
    IvanAndreevich
    IvanAndreevich is offline
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    3,858
    Quote Originally Posted by froste View Post
    I belive that was the 5750 in the benchmark, hopefully the 5770 has a pretty decent jump in performance. *crossing fingers*
    Yeah, but for $150 it has to be beating GTX 260 Core 216 and HD4870. Good price for this would be $100-125.
    i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
    Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60
    Quote Originally Posted by CompGeek
    The US is the only country that doesn't use [nuclear weapons] to terrorize other countries. The US is based on Christian values, unlike any other country in the world. Granted we are straying from our Christian heritage, but we still have a freedom aimed diplomatic stance.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 10-02-2009, 03:40 AM #20
    geo
    geo is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by froste View Post
    I belive that was the 5750 in the benchmark, hopefully the 5770 has a pretty decent jump in performance. *crossing fingers*
    i think that was 5750 benchmark
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 10-01-2009, 09:19 PM #21
    froste
    froste is offline
    Xtreme EV
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    108
    Very true, $100 and $150 would a smoking deal... I guess they're trying to sell the DX11 and other new features, not just the performance
    "I only want to be known as the best ever......is that too much to ask?" - B.J. Penn
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 10-01-2009, 10:06 PM #22
    zanzabar
    zanzabar is offline
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    how reliable is this place (or this guy) they dont know how to bench vantage

    i really dont like this 2 dvi, DP and hdmi.
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 10-02-2009, 12:59 AM #23
    netkas
    netkas is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    91
    lol. they erased device-id field in gpuz, but same device-id was printed in GPU field.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 10-02-2009, 02:07 AM #24
    eric66
    eric66 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    sucky performance hope they improve it and 128 bit bus is ghey u put so much things into this card and then limit it to 128 bit lol way to go ati....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  25. 10-02-2009, 02:18 AM #25
    Smartidiot89
    Smartidiot89 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    sucky performance hope they improve it and 128 bit bus is ghey u put so much things into this card and then limit it to 128 bit lol way to go ati....
    GDDR5
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 1 of 9 1234 ... LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules