[[Daily R!G]]
Core i7 920 D0 @ 4.0GHz w/ 1.325 vcore.
Rampage II Gene||CM HAF 932||HX850||MSI GTX 660ti PE OC||Corsair H50||G.Skill Phoenix 3 240GB||G.Skill NQ 6x2GB||Samsung 2333SW
flickr
What do you base that thought on? It is quite much impossible to gain absolute data on how dense the transistors can be manufactured unless the exact same chip is being manufactured on every manufacturers fab.
As it was said, the transistor density of the core is very much dependent on what kind of parts the core has. Usually simple stuff can be packed densier, e.g. SRAM vs. core logic. Also different parts of core won't shrink too well. As far as I know, for example memory controllers aren't shrinking too well when compared to huge SRAM arrays of cache. So yeah, complex stuff has low density and simple stuff has high density.
I'm sure Hans could be a big help here.
Last edited by Calmatory; 09-16-2009 at 06:41 AM.
nvda stock -3% in 2 hours of trading.
glad I shorted! :P
Intel 2600K @ 4.8ghz 1.31v on Water.
ASROCK Z68 Ex4 Gen 3, 16GB G.skill pc1600
MSI GTX 680 1200/6800mhz
2x Vertex LE 60GB Raid 0
Wow nice source. Wasent this charlie guy punched by a nvidia rep (physically punched). no wonder he's talking out of his ***
Intel is like Egypt in Rome:total war
Why r people putting so much fate in an article written by Charlie on a site called Semi Accurate?
Its a fact that Charlie aint an Nvidia fan and tells rumors asif they where facts and manages to make everything sound dramatic.
Just stop clicking on links to articles written by him and if we r lucky they guy will stop getting work.
Besides that if GT300 would flop Nvidia wont be happy but they wont go under either.
They should have enough cash in the bank to handle another bad year or 2.
@Unoid.
Unles u shortened a load of Nvidia stock i doubt you made alot on it.
At what was Nvidia stock before the drop? 16 US dollars?
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Groucho Marx
i know my grammar sux so stop hitting me
AMD/ATI ftw! Back on the top of the hill!
.:: Gaming PC Specs ::.
Case: Antec Nine Hundred
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K @ 4.6 GHz, 1.44v (cooled by Xigmatek GAIA) [IntelBurnTest{Linpack} stable]
GPU/Monitor: VisionTek HD 6950 @ 6970, 950 MHz/1375 MHz 1.30v + Sony BRAVIA 32EX400 1080p
Motherboard: GIGABYTE Z68XP-UD4 F5
Memory: 16 GB (4x 4 GB) Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600
Hard Drive: 2x Seagate 500 GB 7200.11 RAID 0 & RAID 1 (Matrix RAID) + 1x WD Caviar Black 640 GB
Sound: Creative SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Profess1onal, Logitech X-530
PSU: Corsair AX-1200 (1500W PSU!)
O/S: Microsoft® Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 X64
haha, no, not as far as i know
1. charlie didnt like nvidia before that event at last years computex
2. derek perez threw some muffin or sandwich at charlie, who spilled a cup of hot coffe over him, after that perez wanted to attack charlie but was held back or didnt do it... dont know the full details...
I would, if XFX give one of those sweet PSU's free with the XFX 295
What i heard was charlie disclosed something that nvidia did not want him too and he did not take it off the site, after that nvidia cut him off from the family. It was after this when charlie demanded justice from derek perez did things went the way u said with the muffin, etc... "DOnt know full story either"
Last edited by ajaidev; 09-16-2009 at 09:07 AM.
Coming Soon
I wouldn't be surprised if the yields were low, however this is Charlie and his SEMI accurate make believe fairytale anti-nVidia nonsense
In reality if it's an ATi story, knock off 10% and if it's an nVidia story add 10%.
Yeilds are probably awful... in fact woeful but higher than 2%.
The sooner people stop quoting Le Fud, Teh Inq and this new Semi-accurate nonsense the better
John
Stop looking at the walls, look out the window
Hilarious I had to google for this, the true story is even better
While we're at it let me quote from the big man himself:
Here you have the full scoop right here, at XS Derek Perez Muscle Boy
SweClockers.com
CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
GPU: HD 5770
From that thread :
Disclaimer: This is a joke. It did not really happen. Though Derek did invite Charlie for coffee.
SweClockers.com
CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
GPU: HD 5770
nvidia got bad samples because architecture was too complicated? I think that nvidia and ati share same manufacturer? right?
Vishera 8320@ 5ghz | Gigabyte UD3 | 8gb TridentX 2400 c10| Powercolor 6850 | Thermalight Silver Arrow (bench Super KAZE 3k) | Samsung 830 128gbx2 Raid 0| Fractal case
I honestly hope that GT300 will be close to 3 * GTX 285 level of performance and possibly 40-50% ahead of HD 5870. Anything less would just be plain disappointing, how else can you justify barely any decrease in die size while switching from 65nm to 40nm.
--lapped Q9650 #L828A446 @ 4.608, 1.45V bios, 1.425V load.
-- NH-D14 2x Delta AFB1212SHE push/pull and 110 cfm fan -- Coollaboratory Liquid PRO
-- Gigabyte EP45-UD3P ( F10 ) - G.Skill 4x2Gb 9600 PI @ 1221 5-5-5-15, PL8, 2.1V
- GTX 480 ( 875/1750/928)
- HAF 932 - Antec TPQ 1200 -- Crucial C300 128Gb boot --
Primary Monitor - Samsung T260
There is no way GT300 will bring 3X GTX285 performance. IMO it`s impossible to achieve with this generation. Moreover it will be at best 10-20% faster than Rv870
gt300 fails if its price/performance ratio is worse like at all than 5870x2
basically as long as its in between 5870 and 5870x2 and its price matches... its fine... but as soon as gt300 = 5870 x2 in price... but 5870 1.5x in performance... its game over again...
gt300 needs to be epic for it to be a success... while this may happen... I'm becoming more skeptical everyday we have ABSOLUTELY NO INFORMATION about it... we already have an inkling about the 5870... but the gt300... not even a real die size
Asus Rampage II Gene | Core i7 920 | 6*2GB Mushkin 998729 | BFG GTX280 OCX | Auzentech X-Fi Forte | Corsair VX550
—Life is too short to be bound by the moral, ethical and legal constraints imposed on us by modern day society.
Bookmarks