Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 29

Thread: Upgrade time what would you do X58/P55

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Posts
    42

    Upgrade time what would you do X58/P55

    Hi all

    Im looking to upgrade my system and want to reach 4.5Ghz if i can I will be using water.

    I've been looking at i920 + good X58 MB for over clocking and 6Gb tri channel ram

    Or

    i860 + good P55 MB for over clocking and 4Gb dual channel ram

    What would you do?
    what will give me the most performance with one of the new graphics cards coming out ether ATI or Nvidia which ever is the fastest?

    Budget is not a problem

    Thanks.
    Last edited by leighl; 09-07-2009 at 11:45 AM.

  2. #2
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by leighl View Post
    Budget is not a problem.
    Definitely x58 then.
    Better boards and higher overall performance atm.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Posts
    42
    Ok that sound good what Mb would ya recomend

  4. #4
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    i would go with the p55 if u are planning 1 or 2 gpus, the on cpu pci-e controller and less componants should make it perform better with less IO latency and its cheaper. but the x58 is needed for 3/4 gpus.

    and if u get good ram from the initial benches it looks like the p55 will be faster clock for clock (if u get the 4 core with ht) with most things so long as they arnt ram bound and thats not a common problem
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  5. #5
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Australia! :)
    Posts
    6,096
    if budget is not a prob then there really is no choice!

    X58 + 920 + 6GB done!
    DNA = Design Not Accident
    DNA = Darwin Not Accurate

    heatware / ebay
    HARDWARE I only own Xeons, Extreme Editions & Lian Li's
    https://prism-break.org/

  6. #6
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by leighl View Post
    Ok that sound good what Mb would ya recomend
    Either Gigabyte UD5 if you want to save up some or EVGA Classified if you want to OC to the limit.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Emonton
    Posts
    83
    X58 and 920 and two 295 gtx!!!
    Intel i7 960
    EK Waterblocks EK-Supreme HF Full Nickel Rev 2
    eVGA Classified 3 X58
    Kingston DDR3 1600 12GB black
    PNY 470 GTX 3-way SLI
    Seasonic 1250watt
    Silverstone FT02B

    Intel i7 930
    Thermalright Ultra 120 extreme 1366
    Gigabyte G1.guerrilla 1366
    Kingston 1600 12GB black
    PNY XLR8 465 GTX
    Enermax 1050watt Revolution 85+
    CoolerMaster HAF-X

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Posts
    42
    Ok well have been looking at some of the p55 reviews and they look quite good but not sure what would be faster between 920 and 860 clock for clock at say 4.5Ghz if both chips would reach that OC

    The other thing im wondering about is PCIe lanes if running 2 GPU's P55 will do 2x8 and X58 will do 2x16

    Starage two 295 gtx!!! sounds great but im waiting to see whats around the corner with ATI and Nvidia

  9. #9
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    526
    I think 4.5GHz might be a bit wishful thinking.

    Will you be watercooling?

  10. #10
    Mr. Boardburner
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Posts
    5,340
    The problem with hardware is that you can wait forever, there's always something better around the corner. If budget isn't a problem, go with dual 295s, a 920 and 6GB. X58 should support the future 6-core i9 CPUs as well.
    Main rig:
    CPU: I7 920C0 @ 3.6Ghz (180*20)
    Mobo: DFI UT X58 T3eH8
    RAM: 12GB OCZ DDR3-1600 Platinum
    GPU/LCD: GeForce GTX280 + GeForce 8600GTS (Quad LCDs)
    Intel X25-M G2 80GB, 12TB storage
    PSU/Case: Corsair AX850, Silverstone TJ07

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Posts
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris_redfield View Post
    I think 4.5GHz might be a bit wishful thinking.

    Will you be watercooling?
    Yes I will be water cooling and this is the OC that I would like to try and reach.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Posts
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by Martijn View Post
    The problem with hardware is that you can wait forever, there's always something better around the corner. If budget isn't a problem, go with dual 295s, a 920 and 6GB. X58 should support the future 6-core i9 CPUs as well.
    I would go for those cards but the only thing hardware wise im waiting for is DX11 cards for Win 7. Other than that im leaning to wards 920 and X58 with 6Gb.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,062
    Quote Originally Posted by leighl View Post
    I would go for those cards but the only thing hardware wise im waiting for is DX11 cards for Win 7. Other than that im leaning to wards 920 and X58 with 6Gb.
    +1, good decision, just grab a 920 + X58 + 6GB memory (Corsair Dominator) and you're set. Spending on a dual 295 would be a waste while ATI next gen is just around the corner, I would wait if I were you.

    CPU: Core i7-2600K@4.8Ghz Mobo: Asus Sabertooth P67 Case: Corsair 700D w/ 800D window
    CPU Cooler:
    Corsair H70 w/ 2 GTs AP-15 GPU: 2xGigabyte GTX 670 WindForce OC SLI
    RAM: 2x8GB G.Skill Ripjaws PSU: Corsair AX850W Sound card: Asus Xonar DX + Fiio E9
    HDD:
    Crucial M4 128GB + 4TB HDD Display: 3x30" Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP-HC
    Speakers: Logitech Z-5500 Headphone: Sennheiser HD650

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    32
    The issue with SLI/CF on the p55 is really annoying... I'm going to upgrade to i7 from my Q6600 but since p55 would have problems with two new gen ati cards I'll most likely end up buing x58 and that's a year old...
    I do feel really stupid thinking that p55 would be worth waiting for if your going to use SLI/CF.

    But my guess is that I'm not the only one that made that mistake. :P

  15. #15
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Smyrna Beach Florida
    Posts
    229
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil_AnAnAs View Post
    The issue with SLI/CF on the p55 is really annoying... I'm going to upgrade to i7 from my Q6600 but since p55 would have problems with two new gen ati cards I'll most likely end up buing x58 and that's a year old...
    I do feel really stupid thinking that p55 would be worth waiting for if your going to use SLI/CF.

    But my guess is that I'm not the only one that made that mistake. :P
    A TIMES 2 CARD WOULD WORK THOUGH RIGHT? and you get the advantage of using all 2 gigs of your ram? I just hate how crossfire does not allow the second card to use it's ram as well, atleast that's what I think ? am I right?
    Intel DP45SG
    4 gigs DDR3 G-Skill 8-8-8-20
    640 Caviar Black
    Dual 755 sa plextor
    Asus EAH TOP 4890 1 gig ddr5
    Q9550
    Zalman9500
    Thermaltake Armor

  16. #16
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    Absolutelty a food point dum, also if you use anything else such as raid or networking or dvr cards it locks down the slot, too...SO in alot of single GPU configs they will suffer, especially with the next generation cards, they are put on a x16slot for a REASON!

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,755
    Quote Originally Posted by leighl View Post
    Ok well have been looking at some of the p55 reviews and they look quite good but not sure what would be faster between 920 and 860 clock for clock at say 4.5Ghz if both chips would reach that OC

    The other thing im wondering about is PCIe lanes if running 2 GPU's P55 will do 2x8 and X58 will do 2x16

    Starage two 295 gtx!!! sounds great but im waiting to see whats around the corner with ATI and Nvidia
    It can even be worse than that from what i read. On some motherboards, the second PCI-Express x16 slot is not connected to the PCI-Express controller of the processor through 8 lanes but to the PCI-Express controller of the P55 Express through 4 lanes and then, the lanes going to the P55 Express being slower than the ones going to the processor, the second PCI-Express x16 slot end-up being 4 times slower than if it was x8

    You can find a motherboards list with how the second PCI-Express x16 slot is set up here: http://www.hardware.fr/news/lire/09-09-2009/
    Crosshair IV Formula
    Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.7G
    6950~>6970 @ 900/1300
    4 x 2G Ballistix 1333 CL6
    C300 64G
    Corsair TX 850W
    CM HAF 932

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Emonton
    Posts
    83
    I would stay with 775 socket or go with 1366 socket only. I am using an ECS x58 board (Not an overclocking board but 100% stable and everything thing works as it should) and have no problems at all. I would only consider P55 board for a low cost PC non sli of cf setup. Really 6gb ddr3 1600 ram is so cheap now too. Really x58 is the best way to go, the only big cost would be the CPU.
    Intel i7 960
    EK Waterblocks EK-Supreme HF Full Nickel Rev 2
    eVGA Classified 3 X58
    Kingston DDR3 1600 12GB black
    PNY 470 GTX 3-way SLI
    Seasonic 1250watt
    Silverstone FT02B

    Intel i7 930
    Thermalright Ultra 120 extreme 1366
    Gigabyte G1.guerrilla 1366
    Kingston 1600 12GB black
    PNY XLR8 465 GTX
    Enermax 1050watt Revolution 85+
    CoolerMaster HAF-X

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Posts
    42
    Has any one seen reviews on 920 vs 860 at 4Ghz with out the turbo enabled all reviews seem to be at stock clocks with turbo enabled and in which case the 860 will out perform the 920 because it is clocking higher.

    Would like to see how these chips compare at the same clock.

  20. #20
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    the 860 and 940 are clock for clock
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  21. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Emonton
    Posts
    83
    What is the deal with two chips. i5 and i7 1156 socket? The P55 boards look like any updated p45 board with ddr3.
    Intel i7 960
    EK Waterblocks EK-Supreme HF Full Nickel Rev 2
    eVGA Classified 3 X58
    Kingston DDR3 1600 12GB black
    PNY 470 GTX 3-way SLI
    Seasonic 1250watt
    Silverstone FT02B

    Intel i7 930
    Thermalright Ultra 120 extreme 1366
    Gigabyte G1.guerrilla 1366
    Kingston 1600 12GB black
    PNY XLR8 465 GTX
    Enermax 1050watt Revolution 85+
    CoolerMaster HAF-X

  22. #22
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    Quote Originally Posted by Starage View Post
    What is the deal with two chips. i5 and i7 1156 socket? The P55 boards look like any updated p45 board with ddr3.
    the 1156 has 2 ram channels with 16x pci-e2 on cpu
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  23. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Emonton
    Posts
    83
    It is just most boards specs are sli and cf 8x per lane not 16x. That really sucks and makes not sense. So looking at that, p55 setups suck. Yes dual channel ram is no big thing either.
    Intel i7 960
    EK Waterblocks EK-Supreme HF Full Nickel Rev 2
    eVGA Classified 3 X58
    Kingston DDR3 1600 12GB black
    PNY 470 GTX 3-way SLI
    Seasonic 1250watt
    Silverstone FT02B

    Intel i7 930
    Thermalright Ultra 120 extreme 1366
    Gigabyte G1.guerrilla 1366
    Kingston 1600 12GB black
    PNY XLR8 465 GTX
    Enermax 1050watt Revolution 85+
    CoolerMaster HAF-X

  24. #24
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    8x8 is not a problem with pci-e2 for single gpu cards
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  25. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by zanzabar View Post
    8x8 is not a problem with pci-e2 for single gpu cards
    Also if you really want dual cards you can always look into getting say a HD5870X2 when they come out. It will run on x16 PCIe2.0 rather then x8/x8 so you won't have a bottleneck (if there is any).

    Plus where are these benches showing i920 and i860 clock for clock? I can see them being equally as fast but only when they are both at stock speed (i920-2.66GHz i860-2.8GHz) making i920 faster clock for clock.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •