Foxconn BloodRage Benchmarks

[CobraXP]

Hi All,
I want to say thank you got all the great advice and all the support for inside this community. I love the BR and was hoping we can start a benchmark section for it. Maybe a mod can run a top scores for benchmarks for fun. Anyways here are some benchmark scores I have ran. Due to a problem with one of my cards I get below what I expected on Quad SLI but better marks with a single card. I am still fine tuning the board but having fun doing it

This is single card 3DMark Vantage Physx enabled


This is Quad Vantage Physx enabled


This is single card 3DMark 06



This is Quad 3DMark06

[zalbard]

You should post bigger images imo, it's pretty hard to see numbers that way.

[CobraXP]

You should post bigger images imo, it's pretty hard to see numbers that way.

Yeah I know. I get screamed at on other forums for bigger than 800x600.

1280x1024 ok?

[Paxi]

The Vantage CPU Score is way too high.. 5,0Ghz i7 normally get you ~30k. Must be a bug, otherwise nice stuff you got there

[zalbard]

Yeah I know. I get screamed at on other forums for bigger than 800x600.

1280x1024 ok?

It's fine, sure, thanks.

The Vantage CPU Score is way too high.. 5,0Ghz i7 normally get you ~30k. Never seen something like this before..

Cause of PhysX.

[CobraXP]

Yeah Physx looks cool . I will run some with it off.

[Paxi]

Sry my fault.. i just looked at the score

[Utnorris]

Looks good. Just curious as to why your vcore was changed between 1.39v and 1.44v-1.47v going from Single to SLI, was there a reason for it?

[CobraXP]

Looks good. Just curious as to why your vcore was changed between 1.39v and 1.44v-1.47v going from Single to SLI, was there a reason for it?

The higher vcore was when I first got everything and started messing with it. The 1.39v is more tuned and stable. I couldn't do any quad runs cause I rma'ed the card before I could.

[Utnorris]

The higher vcore was when I first got everything and started messing with it. The 1.39v is more tuned and stable. I couldn't do any quad runs cause I rma'ed the card before I could.

Then why do some of the SS's show 4 GPU's?

[PiLsY]

Think you've misread it - his single card runs are newer than his quad card runs. He's just organised them by benchmark program not chronologically . 06 and vantage single card runs are both with 2 gpus and tweaked rig but after rma, quad runs are his initial setup and untweaked vcore before rma. Thats how I read it anyway?

Anyway, i'll throw some scores up once im sure ive got a 24/7 stable setting. I'm kinda close to your single 295 setup, be good to see how we compare .

[CobraXP]

Think you've misread it - his single card runs are newer than his quad card runs. He's just organised them by benchmark program not chronologically . 06 and vantage single card runs are both with 2 gpus and tweaked rig but after rma, quad runs are his initial setup and untweaked vcore before rma. Thats how I read it anyway?

Anyway, i'll throw some scores up once im sure ive got a 24/7 stable setting. I'm kinda close to your single 295 setup, be good to see how we compare .

Yes exactly what I ment lol.

Sweet. It seems to be as good or better board than my friends Evga X58 E758

[PiLsY]

I've lost a lot of 3dmark points somewhere... Im thousands of points down on both 06 and vantage compared to the EX58-UD3R.

Exact settings were:

Ex58-UD3R : 21 x 200 4200mhz cpu HT off / 3850mhz uncore / 1600mhz mem 7-7-6-16-1T-52-5-12-4-3 / SLi@700/1522/1150
BR: 21 x 205 4306mhz HT off / 4105mhz uncore / 2052mhz mem 8-9-8-20-64-6-14-3-3 / SLi@775/1548/1188

EX58-UD3R gets 25165 in 06 compared to 23265 on the BR. Also PhysX appears to do nothing for my scores in vantage, I get no increase at all. Think I need a reinstall of windows at some point soon .

[CobraXP]

It may be something with the video driver. I hear the new 190.62 nvidia driver does a nice increase on vantage but drops your score in 06. I am still using 186.18 on mine, but will try the newer one when I get my vid back from Evga.

[saaya]

very nice! thats a sweet desktop background too, its from evga right? looks nice

[CobraXP]

very nice! thats a sweet desktop background too, its from evga right? looks nice

TY sayaa. I looked for a BR one but no luck and I suck at making them so I went with my card manufacturer. I am edging my friend with a similar setup except a X58 Evga E758 mobo.

Just hoping you guys post some benchmarks to show some none believers out there that this is a kick ass board. Plus people getting tuning ideas from looking at the screenies.

[PiLsY]

Im so close to you Ive been resisting posting here . I got you beat with a suicide run but not a 24/7 stable run, so still trying. Investigating a whole new mem multiplier now (damn you!)...

How the hell do you submit saved 3d06 results? I'm @ 27329 in '06 physx on anyway @ 24/7 settings.

P26629 Physx Enabled @ 24/7 settings.

Reckon im doing pretty well considering im 100mhz cpu down and 48 shaders down, I thought the gap would be bigger .

You should really stick some non physx benches up - even with just the "single" card .

[CobraXP]

I will I got some non physx just haven't posted them yet. Thats my top speed on my cpu so far but it is not stable. That is pretty damn good for a GTX 260. I am impressed. Thx for the scores

I am should have my other card back sometime next week so I will try some diff thing and keep everything physx off.

I saw u used the 190.62 driver??? I got lower scores with that and had better luck with 186.18. I lost over a 1,000 points on vantage with that driver. Just food for thought.

[PiLsY]

I'm at just under 22k on Vantage with PhysX off as a comparison.

Must admit I've been generally very impressed with the gtx260. Even single card was pretty good. Just gutted I paid £200 for card 1 in march, £135 for card 2 in June and now they're £100 a go if you catch them on offer somewhere. Great value.

I'll have to vmod them at some point, but I reckon i'll need a better psu first. especially if I'm upgrading the cpu too...

I'm on 190.62 as it seems to look better to me in games (and even in 3dmark) than other drivers. I can't see the LOD steps anywhere near as clearly on this driver. Farcry 2 benchmark theyre usually really obvious, but with this driver they seem quite well blended. I'm happy to lose a couple of fps if everything looks better for it .

When I reinstall i'll try 186.18 for a few benches before I stick 190.62 back on . Cheers for the tip .

[dragonz1r]

please post memory and spd charts from cpuz.

thank you

[CobraXP]

I finally got my RMA'ed card back. Ran a few tests last night but didn't have too much time. I should have more time in the next few days. This is with Physx enabled.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1471109

[CobraXP]

new 191.07 driver.... i keep forgetting to turn off physx

[Utnorris]

Ok, so here are some benches at 1.3v GPU and 4.6Ghz at 1.41v vcore under Phase, BIOS P06:

929/1243 3DMark06


929/1243 Vantage


957/1272 3DMark06


957/1272 Vantage


998/1298 3Dmark06


998/1298 Vantage


1021/1298 3DMark06


1021/1298 Vantage


PI


Not bad, but there is way more, wish I had the PCIe mod. I will see what I can get out of P09 later this week.

[saaya]

1020? is that stock cooling? nice!

[Utnorris]

Yep, stock cooling. Thanks. I haven't decided on a block yet or whether I will do FC or GPU only this time around, but she does have more in her. The CPU has more in her too and I will probably try P09 later this week to see if I can't get 4800 out of it.