Page 29 of 91 FirstFirst ... 19262728293031323979 ... LastLast
Results 701 to 725 of 2268

Thread: The ATI Radeon 5XXX Thread

  1. #701
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    415
    however, i've got two panels here: a 19" viewsonic va902 with 8ms and a 22" widescreen lg l227wt with 2ms. the 8ms response time of the viewsonic are completely unacceptable for gaming. when moving the mouse in a fps everything is soo blurred and fuzzy. you can hardly see any details while moving around. for me that's definately a nogo for gaming... a friend of mine has a 24" with 5 ms and even these 5ms look a lot worse than my l227wt with 2ms, else i'd have already swapped my 22" for a 24" display.
    i really do think overdrive is doing a damn good job on these 22" 2ms panels. there's definately a huge difference between 2ms panels with good overdrive and ones with more response time.
    Whoever believes this 2ms crapshoot response value he has absolutely no clue about LCD monitors, that's for sure.

  2. #702
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    415
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    Indeed, crysis has motion blure, tf2 has it, COD4... every game new game basically. Some more then others.
    Yeah. When I just simply turn and everything blurs that sucks, let alone it has absolutely nothing to do with real world experience.

  3. #703
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    1,307
    Quote Originally Posted by RaZz! View Post
    snip
    There are IPS panels suitable for gaming, however most are not. There was a 20" NEC that was a great gaming monitor(20WMGX2 iirc), but has been discontinued.
    Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
    for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
    CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
    Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
    GPU:HD5850 1GB
    PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty )

  4. #704
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    3,433
    Quote Originally Posted by T2k View Post
    Whoever believes this 2ms crapshoot response value he has absolutely no clue about LCD monitors, that's for sure.
    +1....
    "Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is…"
    //James

  5. #705
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,788
    Quote Originally Posted by Jamesrt2004 View Post
    +1....
    +2
    Asus Rampage II Gene | Core i7 920 | 6*2GB Mushkin 998729 | BFG GTX280 OCX | Auzentech X-Fi Forte | Corsair VX550
    —Life is too short to be bound by the moral, ethical and legal constraints imposed on us by modern day society.

  6. #706
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by T2k View Post
    Whoever believes this 2ms crapshoot response value he has absolutely no clue about LCD monitors, that's for sure.
    BUT MY CUONTAH STRIKE BELIVES SO!
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

  7. #707
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by orangekiwii View Post
    because typin 1080p is easier than typing 1920x1200
    I could type 1200p but not everyone knows that
    Clearly everyone doesn't know that because no such thing exists.

    The HDTV video mode 1080p assumes 16:9 aspect ratio, that's why the horizontal lines are not mentioned when HDTV resolution is presented.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1080p
    1080p is the shorthand name for a category of HDTV video modes...The term usually assumes a widescreen aspect ratio of 16:9, implying a horizontal resolution of 1920 pixels.

  8. #708
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Central California
    Posts
    359
    Quote Originally Posted by BrowncoatGR View Post
    There are IPS panels suitable for gaming, however most are not. There was a 20" NEC that was a great gaming monitor(20WMGX2 iirc), but has been discontinued.
    *Hugs his Benq FP241W*

  9. #709
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,247
    Quote Originally Posted by Xope_Poquar View Post




    I believe that's becoming a popular "feature" in modern games.
    object based blur is a different story though

    Quote Originally Posted by Xope_Poquar View Post
    *Hugs his Benq FP241W*
    woah, that thing is rated for 95w power consumption. pretty high for a tft.
    Last edited by RaZz!; 09-13-2009 at 11:45 AM.
    1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile


    2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W

  10. #710
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by Xope_Poquar View Post
    *Hugs his Benq FP241W*
    I have it's big brother Benq FP241WZ and it's been perfect for all types of games thus far.

  11. #711
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,062
    I'm happy to game on my 30" 3007WFP-HC, don't wanna go back to the 2407WFP.

    CPU: Core i7-2600K@4.8Ghz Mobo: Asus Sabertooth P67 Case: Corsair 700D w/ 800D window
    CPU Cooler:
    Corsair H70 w/ 2 GTs AP-15 GPU: 2xGigabyte GTX 670 WindForce OC SLI
    RAM: 2x8GB G.Skill Ripjaws PSU: Corsair AX850W Sound card: Asus Xonar DX + Fiio E9
    HDD:
    Crucial M4 128GB + 4TB HDD Display: 3x30" Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP-HC
    Speakers: Logitech Z-5500 Headphone: Sennheiser HD650

  12. #712
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    I stand corrected then. I only go by what I've read from monitor reviews, so I was lead to believe that high response times and input lag made only TN matrixes acceptable for purposes where images change fast and not in a fluid way. At least, that's what XbitLabs and the Anandtech LCD thread say, as most of the monitors listed underneath the gaming section are TN matrixes. Correct me if you have read otherwise.
    Last edited by cegras; 09-13-2009 at 11:59 AM.
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  13. #713
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by trulez View Post
    Clearly everyone doesn't know that because no such thing exists.

    The HDTV video mode 1080p assumes 16:9 aspect ratio, that's why the horizontal lines are not mentioned when HDTV resolution is presented.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1080p
    1440x1080 with 16/9 DAR is quite common, so assuming is not the best option here...
    Last edited by STaRGaZeR; 09-13-2009 at 12:04 PM.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  14. #714
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Tel Aviv, Israel
    Posts
    1,151
    Don't forget the Dell 2209WA. A great and cheap 22" e-IPS monitor.
    Member of Overclockers.com Folding @ Home team
    "<The_Coolest> you can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now!
    Main rig:
    AMD Ryzen 7 2700X / Mobo: Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB + WD Blue 250GB + HDD / GPU: Dell RX 570 4GB / Mem: 2x16GB DDR4-3200 G.Skill 32GTZKW TridentZ - 32GB total / PSU: Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W
    Secondary rigs:
    Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.3GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / 2x Inland Pro 120GB / GPU: HD5450 / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 8GBXL RipJawsX - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W.
    Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ 4.0GHz (Freezer 7 Pro) / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 4x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 8GB total / PSU: Antec 380W.

    Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors

  15. #715
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    278
    Quote Originally Posted by The Coolest View Post
    Don't forget the Dell 2209WA. A great and cheap 22" e-IPS monitor.
    I got one, best screen i have used, its an 8bit panel with virtually no input lag, amazing screen for $200 bucks.

  16. #716
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    752
    I have a benq gw2400

    works great for what i use it for... little to no ghosting depending on game

    its 5ms but the input lag is around 15 for me so...

  17. #717
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    3,433
    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    I stand corrected then. I only go by what I've read from monitor reviews, so I was lead to believe that high response times and input lag made only TN matrixes acceptable for purposes where images change fast and not in a fluid way. At least, that's what XbitLabs and the Anandtech LCD thread say, as most of the monitors listed underneath the gaming section are TN matrixes. Correct me if you have read otherwise.
    I thinks its mroe down to when the articles where written and the first "cheaper" panels where coming out there was big problems with ghosting etc... like say plasma with burn in and oled with degradation, over time its just matures and ends up not being noticable (thats what i put it down to) the techs just progressed
    "Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is…"
    //James

  18. #718
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Central California
    Posts
    359
    Quote Originally Posted by RaZz! View Post
    woah, that thing is rated for 95w power consumption. pretty high for a tft.

    It's my special wittle space heater.

  19. #719
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    66
    Quote Originally Posted by The Coolest View Post
    Don't forget the Dell 2209WA. A great and cheap 22" e-IPS monitor.
    Unfortunately, Dell seem to have discontinued it. Reading the Dell forum, looks like the supplier couldn't get them enough panels or something. Otherwise 2 of those would make for great surround monitors.

  20. #720
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Kichroa !
    Posts
    231
    Quote Originally Posted by iTravis View Post
    I'm happy to game on my 30" 3007WFP-HC, don't wanna go back to the 2407WFP.
    i second that, great display. better colors than the non hc and a better foot than the next years types.

    but i would love to see the 3007WFP-HC with led backlight.


    ontopic

    Im not sure the hd5850 or hd5870 1gb wil be sufficient to run the 30" with the quality turned to the max. seeing the review of the 4890 1 vs 2gb.
    cpu : e6850 @ 3.5ghz
    cooler : boxed
    mem : balistix 8500 @ 1000mhz 4-4-4-4
    board : asus p5k-e wifi
    graphics : 7800gtx
    harddisk : wd raptor 74gb
    dvd : nec 7173A
    dvdrw : optiarc 18x
    psu : enermax liberty 620W
    screen : dell 3007wfp hc

  21. #721
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,554
    so has this thread become a chat about what monitors we all have or?

    My Free-DC Stats
    You use IRC and Crunch in Xs WCG team? Join #xs.wcg @ Quakenet

  22. #722
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
    1440x1080 with 16/9 DAR is quite common, so assuming is not the best option here...
    Except it's the exact same thing, just with different PIXEL aspect ratio of 1.33:1.

    http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/columns/..._camcorder.php
    1440x1080 video is recorded using rectangular pixels with an aspect ratio of 1.33:1 ... 1.333333 x 1440 = 1920

  23. #723
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,356
    Nobody cares what monitors you guys have... Now about those ATI video cards.
    Last edited by Sly Fox; 09-13-2009 at 02:14 PM.

  24. #724
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,467
    What, this thread is about the cards?
    CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
    New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
    4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165

    Desk Build
    FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage

    W/C System
    (CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.

  25. #725
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,356
    Quote Originally Posted by Utnorris View Post
    What, this thread is about the cards?
    You wouldn't believe it without reading the topic title first would you?

Page 29 of 91 FirstFirst ... 19262728293031323979 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •