Page 2 of 91 FirstFirst 123451252 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 2268

Thread: The ATI Radeon 5XXX Thread

  1. #26
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    A birdie said "the 5870 is beating a GTX 295 in some cases, and is following the GTX295 closely in most cases".
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  2. #27
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    yah it should be faster than a 4870x2 - and probably trade blows with the 295 which puts it near the speed of 4890 CF.

    It's like you guys are saying: 4870x2 specs (shader/tmu/rop) plus 40% greater memory bandwidth minus the associated crossfire overhead. but instead of having multi-gpu in two dies communicating through the plx chip, it all happens on one die, so no overhead or bottlenecks.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  3. #28
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Nedjo View Post
    Seriously saaya, to make your price analysis worthy you ought present some type of research to back up assumptions on equilibrium price-point of market demand and production output...

    Yeah I know it sound difficult, and perhaps even AMD didn't do any research, perhaps they just look upon performance of their new parts, and performance of NV offering and decided to put some price-tag (not saying that what Theo And Charley are claiming is true prices - hell I'm pretty sure there's no way they could have official pricing leaked)
    you can spend an infinite amount of time and money on researching the perfect price points in a given market... the easiest and safest way is still this:

    start at the top, then lower your prices and monitor demand, if it stops picking up, keep the price the same or even increase it a bit again (read: stop giving special discounts to certain customers) then repeat this as time goes by since the market continues to evolve and mfc prices drop...

    its really very similar to fishing

    so yeah, atis approach makes sense, if thats what they are doing... i think they are starting at a too high price point though... and if you do that, you risk losing a lot of peoples attention, and, you risk seriously pssing off customers who bite early and find the same piece of hw for half the price a few weeks later... thats what nvidia ran into with their 8800 and 280 series...

    if you start too high and then drop prices more and more, people become more reserved and sit back and wait to see how low your going to go... and the price point where demand then picks up is lower than it would have been if you wouldnt have started too high to begin with...

    yeah this really is so much like fishing... its pretty obvious why so many business men enjoy fishing hehe

    so, if you start too high you either have to drop prices too fast and that means people wait and you end up dropping the price a lot, or, you play the waiting game and drop the prices steadily, but then your risking that somebody else will throw in their worm at the right spot during the right time and steals your attention
    Last edited by saaya; 09-04-2009 at 01:47 AM.

  4. #29
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by FoamGlass View Post
    399$ = 275€ = cheap to me .
    399$=!275E... if hardware launched at 299$ worldwide in the past it was usually 299E in europe, thanks to VAT...

    so 399$ will be 399E or 349E, not 275...
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    A birdie said "the 5870 is beating a GTX 295 in some cases, and is following the GTX295 closely in most cases".
    was it a turacu or a flamingo? ^^

  5. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Mi
    Posts
    1,063
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    As to your first parts, you are correct, dual GPU cards like the 4870x2 don't increase the bandwidth vs a single GPU card but it also doesn't decrease it.
    Each 800SP/40TMU/16ROP RV770 has 115GBps of bandwidth vs a 1600SP/80TMU/32ROP RV870 that has 160GBps.
    Basically you are, possibly, more than doubling the potential throughput of the 5870 while only increasing bandwidth 39%, which was my original point.
    Sure you don't have the inefficiencies of AFR and a dualGPU setup but you also run into other potential problems/bottlenecks.

    I just have a feeling that we are in for a few surprises when we actually get to take a look at the architecture and performance, there is obviously quite a bit of tweaks/info that we haven't heard about/thought about.

    PS- Before those Vantage scores were leaked, there was talk about Cypress running near 4890CF, which would put it in the same league as a GTX295.

    Yeah dude, you^^ nailed it!



    Secondly, I think people are pricing these too high. The 5850 Will debut @ $269, dropping to $225 by Xmas. The 5870 will debut @ $369 and carry a $299 price tag till next summer.

    The X2 line will get it's own specialized treatment and starting @ $400 ...!


    Some very interesting stuff coming though, specially since they are getting closer to dual-GPU (ie: dual core).. the cross-communication is getting sophisticated and whoever lith is most advanced and robust, will be the class leader of this next gen!

    Expect the X2 to gobble Crysis ~ ARMA 2 and give a really immerse experience. We know nVidia's is going to outperform and cost more, but the X2 has the potential to upset nVidia's business plans.

    The rest is already a forgone conclusion, given that they are already marketing the 300 series, as re-branded cards. nVidia's can only compete in the high-end market and if ATi does this X2 right... nVidia might have a shake up!

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    About the press invites not for the September 10 function:
    quote:
    Just an update ... if you're sitting on the fence about going, I would recommend Deciding quickly, I'm down to only a few spots left. In case you did not Google it and figured it out, the event's being held on the USS Hornet aircraft carrier across the bay from SF to Alameda.

    If you've already dropped me an e-mail you should have heard back from me by now. (If you did, PM me or write me again. ... Gmail was pretty wonky yesterday)
    [...]
    Bring a camera, Flip video camera, whatever you like. The whole joint will have wifi, so you can post pics and vids from the event live.
    http://gathering.tweakers.net/forum/...ssage/32521301

    And there was the other message from the "AMD girl @ gmail.com" that said there would be plenty of chips & cookies to snack on. So sounds like it's going to be a fun time, hopefully they show us some comparison benchmarks, and reveal some official specifications.
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  7. #32
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Madrid (Spain)
    Posts
    352
    I don't find those prices "too high" at all. If they're nearly twice the power of previous gen, with DX11 support, they'll become basically an unrivaled product, with no competence at all. That increases the value considerably, because they are unique features: do you want a DX11 card? Buy that one because there is no other. Do you want the most powerful? The same. And so on.

    We have had the chance to see this on the latter NVIDIA launches, with their 600$ 8800GTX / 800$ 8800Ultra, and their 650$ GTX280, and all the people paying those prices.

    So I don't really think a 399$ top card would be nothing exorbitant. I'd say it's actually a very mild pricing given the circumstances, probably due to AMD wanting to recover market share as fast as possible.

    Of course, other completely different thing will be when NVIDIA enters again to the market. Then, prices will depend on what each one have to offer, and for how much. If NVIDIA releases a faster and cheaper product than that, then AMD will have to lower their prices.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by Farinorco View Post
    We have had the chance to see this on the latter NVIDIA launches, with their 600$ 8800GTX / 800$ 8800Ultra, and their 650$ GTX280, and all the people paying those prices.So I don't really think a 399$ top card would be nothing exorbitant. I'd say it's actually a very mild pricing given the circumstances
    That's a good point. Those were all fastest cards at the time. Ati having the fastest cards ATM and charging 299 399 and 599 is actually quite a bargain for the consumer considering the alternative .
    Bring... bring the amber lamps.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  9. #34
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    399$=!275E... if hardware launched at 299$ worldwide in the past it was usually 299E in europe, thanks to VAT...

    so 399$ will be 399E or 349E, not 275...
    was it a turacu or a flamingo? ^^
    Think it was a red macao
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  10. #35
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Mi
    Posts
    1,063
    Quote Originally Posted by Farinorco View Post
    I don't find those prices "too high" at all. If they're nearly twice the power of previous gen, with DX11 support, they'll become basically an unrivaled product, with no competence at all. That increases the value considerably, because they are unique features: do you want a DX11 card? Buy that one because there is no other. Do you want the most powerful? The same. And so on.

    We have had the chance to see this on the latter NVIDIA launches, with their 600$ 8800GTX / 800$ 8800Ultra, and their 650$ GTX280, and all the people paying those prices.

    So I don't really think a 399$ top card would be nothing exorbitant. I'd say it's actually a very mild pricing given the circumstances, probably due to AMD wanting to recover market share as fast as possible.

    Of course, other completely different thing will be when NVIDIA enters again to the market. Then, prices will depend on what each one have to offer, and for how much. If NVIDIA releases a faster and cheaper product than that, then AMD will have to lower their prices.

    Apparently, you completely missed the global recession going on. ATi would kill themselves if they released their new cards that high. ATi already knows they'll have a 3 month reign (before the holidays) to sell everyone they can make.

    While Nvidia plays lip service and slides.

    Money talks! ATi doesn't have to play the market, they can completly walk away with it!

    ie:
    HD5850 (2GB, DX11) for $225 by Xmas ...!





    Also remember, there are 20million living in New York, half hit by a recession, their buying power alone is 50% of Spain. People are hurting, ATI isn't so aloof they would disregard the economy, as you apperently have...!

  11. #36
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Madrid (Spain)
    Posts
    352
    Quote Originally Posted by Xoulz View Post
    Apparently, you completely missed the global recession going on. ATi would kill themselves if they released their new cards that high. ATi already knows they'll have a 3 month reign (before the holidays) to sell everyone they can make.

    While Nvidia plays lip service and slides.

    Money talks! ATi doesn't have to play the market, they can completly walk away with it!

    ie:
    HD5850 (2GB, DX11) for $225 by Xmas ...!

    Also remember, there are 20million living in New York, half hit by a recession, their buying power alone is 50% of Spain. People are hurting, ATI isn't so aloof they would disregard the economy, as you apperently have...!
    I don't really think that recession is affecting the prices of computer components in any noticeable way, so I don't think AMD should be the only company aware of that situation in the world, but if you think so...

    I've seen the Core i7 releasing for the usual price for a new CPU, the X58 boards for the usual price of a high end chipset, now they are going to release the P55 platform with the usual prices for the performance segment, hard drives of top sizes for the usual huge prices... only thing I see going down are SSD, and way slower than I'd think a year or two ago.
    Last edited by Farinorco; 09-04-2009 at 02:50 AM.

  12. #37
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Quote Originally Posted by Xoulz View Post
    ie:
    HD5850 (2GB, DX11) for $225 by Xmas ...!
    There's no word to describe how impossible this is...

    Wishful thinking doesn't even come close.

    For what it's worth, a HD5870 2GB will more than likely cost 350 - 399$.
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  13. #38
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    950
    is there going to be a 5870x2 ?

  14. #39
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    Think it was a red macao
    ohhh hows he doing these days? hahahah

    i agree with xoulz, i dont think they can keep those prices up, if those prices are correct to begin with... but then again, like others here pointed out, without any competition they can ask for pretty high prices and cash in... but, like i said previously, they shouldnt be too greedy and start with too high prices and then slash them over and over... if prices are too high then a lot of people will enter a wait and see winter sleep until gt300 and larrabee arrive, cause the perf/$ was never as high for vgas as it has been in the past year, and the requirement for games has never been so low as in the past year either... lets face it, nobody really NEEDS a faster vga right now unless they upgrade their displays to a higher resolution first... and nobody NEEDS dx11 with barely any dx10 titles around thanks to consoles holding everything back to dx9...

    so i think ati should try to focus on volume and not too much on making high margins with low volume, cause it might end up being really really low volume... then again, whip out the fishing gear and start teasing and we will see how it will work out

    as long as juniper is priced nicely i wont complain

    xoulz, i dont think 5870x2 will have any technological advancements regarding to multi gpu or dual core gpus etc... thats complete nonsense... before anything like that will make sense you need a high speed low latency bus like HT or qpi and not pciE, and youd need to do lots of logic reworking and adding to make propper use of both gpus more efficiently... and all that for what? you might get 25% extra performance out of a dual gpu card that way... thats not really worth all the effort i think...

    Quote Originally Posted by dan7777 View Post
    is there going to be a 5870x2 ?
    yes, but not at launch...

  15. #40
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    so 399$ will be 399E or 349E, not 275...
    You're right saaya, 399€ seems plausible.

    But HD5850 is maybe a better deal. Is it only frequencies differences between those two cards ?

  16. #41
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
    You're right saaya, 399€ seems plausible.

    But HD5850 is maybe a better deal. Is it only frequencies differences between those two cards ?
    My guess is lower binned GPU (obviously) with lower frequencies, and perhaps it will use different/lower binned GDDR5 memory modules? There has to be some difference betweeen the cards imo, if not it will be another HD3850/HD3870 situation were it was obsolute
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

  17. #42
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    largon braught up a good point in the other thread just now... 870 is a big gpu and 40nm yields are far from perfect... they cant throw away bad parts, and the next lower part they could use these gpus for is juniper with 800sps... thats a lot lower... so it makes sense if the 5850 is actually lower in specs and has less sps and maybe even other blocks disabled... 1200sps should be enough tp beat the 285 easily and gives them enough headroom to get even notably damaged rv870 cores sold without losing a lot of money on them...

  18. #43
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Shenzhen, China + Thurso, Scotland
    Posts
    186
    Ok so if its 100 less than the gtx285 then what would that be here cause the gtx285 is about 250 so maybe it will 199.99 ?
    CPU: Pentium 4(L6SB)> E4500>E6700>E8200>Q6700>i7 920>I5 750>2500K
    GPU: Nvidia Ti 4200>ATI 9800 PRO>Nvidia 8600GT>8800GT SLI>GTX260>ATI HD4870>HD5770>HD6950

  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,128
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    largon braught up a good point in the other thread just now... 870 is a big gpu and 40nm yields are far from perfect... they cant throw away bad parts, and the next lower part they could use these gpus for is juniper with 800sps... thats a lot lower... so it makes sense if the 5850 is actually lower in specs and has less sps and maybe even other blocks disabled... 1200sps should be enough tp beat the 285 easily and gives them enough headroom to get even notably damaged rv870 cores sold without losing a lot of money on them...
    So HD5850 would go EOL in few months once the process matures? Or would AMD start to cripple the fully functional HD5870 cards to HD5850 cards because of high demand for the cheap 1200 SP cards?

    A good plan for the first few months, which will backfire with good yields.

  20. #45
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    USA /okla
    Posts
    2,103
    looks like its EBAY time for my 4870x2 and EK nickel block and live on my backup card for a couple weeks

    oh wait is there a 5870x2 coming out soon ? or just the 5870 ?
    i7 6700K @4.8 ghz
    XSPC RayStorm (very nice block)
    Z170 Sabertooh ,, 32GB- Gskill (15-15-15-36 @3600 mhz) 1:1
    XFX-7970 with Swiftech Komodo nickel block
    Water Cooling - MO-RA3 Pro with 4 Silverstone 180mm @ 700 rpm, Twin Vario mcp-655 pumps
    Samsung 850-1TB SSD,, OCZ ZX-1250W (powerfull and silent)
    Crossfire 30" decent monitor for IPS too bad SED tech died

    Docsis2.0 Docsis3.0

    -- People who reject the idea that "government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality" give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition.

  21. #46
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by Calmatory View Post
    So HD5850 would go EOL in few months once the process matures? Or would AMD start to cripple the fully functional HD5870 cards to HD5850 cards because of high demand for the cheap 1200 SP cards?

    A good plan for the first few months, which will backfire with good yields.
    Nope ,they will just lower the clock speed on GPU or both on GPU and memory.Voila ,you have the 20-30% less performance with the same shader count- HD4850 all over again

  22. #47
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Kylzer View Post
    Ok so if its 100 less than the gtx285 then what would that be here cause the gtx285 is about 250 so maybe it will 199.99 ?
    nobody said 100$ less than GTS285... theres a rumor saying 100$ less than GTX295...

    Quote Originally Posted by Calmatory View Post
    So HD5850 would go EOL in few months once the process matures? Or would AMD start to cripple the fully functional HD5870 cards to HD5850 cards because of high demand for the cheap 1200 SP cards?

    A good plan for the first few months, which will backfire with good yields.
    hw mfcs really dont care about selling fully functional silicon partly disabled... they sell top bin silicon as lowest bin in huge volume all the time as well... the more yields improve the lower the price diference between 5850 and 5870 could get i suppose, they could balance it out that way

    Quote Originally Posted by iboomalot View Post
    looks like its EBAY time for my 4870x2 and EK nickel block and live on my backup card for a couple weeks

    oh wait is there a 5870x2 coming out soon ? or just the 5870 ?
    only 5850 for now, then 5870 shortly after and then 5870x2 "soon"

  23. #48
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    and those investors know more about running amd than amd does?
    Two words: shareholders value.

    Quote Originally Posted by Calmatory View Post
    So HD5850 would go EOL in few months once the process matures? Or would AMD start to cripple the fully functional HD5870 cards to HD5850 cards because of high demand for the cheap 1200 SP cards?

    A good plan for the first few months, which will backfire with good yields.
    Doesn't matter. That's how it has been all the past years, why should it change? Why can many AMD X3s be unlocked to X4s? Why were there so many X1800 GTOs that could be unlocked (until ATI introduced a laser cut?)?
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

  24. #49
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    242
    Quote Originally Posted by Calmatory View Post
    So HD5850 would go EOL in few months once the process matures? Or would AMD start to cripple the fully functional HD5870 cards to HD5850 cards because of high demand for the cheap 1200 SP cards?

    A good plan for the first few months, which will backfire with good yields.
    What I'd like to see if these specs are true would be some kind of HD5850+ model once the process improves. Charge a bit more or something and EOL the 5850.

  25. #50
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    like the gtx260 216sp?
    yeah wouldnt be surprised if amd did that... provided the 5850 IS cut down in hw specs...

Page 2 of 91 FirstFirst 123451252 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •