Newegg did offer me a return for this 295 so maybe i could just save a little money :P
Newegg did offer me a return for this 295 so maybe i could just save a little money :P
Computer #1
Phenom X4 II 965
8 GB DDR3
Nvidia GTX 295
300 GB Velociraptor
28" LCD
52" HDTV
If they offered you a return go for it, if not don't bother.
WORKSTATION || TJ10B-W | i7-3930K C2 | 4x8GB DDR3-2400 CL10 | 2xGTX TITAN 6GB SLI | P1000W || 30" 2560x1600@60hz
HTPC || GD08B | i7-920 D0 | 3x4GB 2000 CL9 | HD5870 1GB | X25-M 80GB | X-750 || 75" 1920x1080@4x200hz
NOTEBOOK || P170EM | i7-3820QM | 2x8GB DDR3 1600 CL9 | GTX680M 4GB | HyperX 3K 240GB || 17,3" 1920x1080@60hz
ULTRABOOK || W130EW | i7-3620QM | 2x8GB DDR3 1600 CL9 | HD4000 | HyperX 3K 240GB || 13,3" 1366x768@60hz
I run 2560x1600, looks like Xfire scaling is GREAT there with two 5870's, but I'm not sure I want to shell out for two... really was looking to only buy one . Sounds like the 5850's won't show just yet either from that review's google translation, leaving my option of two 5850's closed =\.
5850 comes with Win7 (1 month after 5870)
I don't trust toms for one second, and even if it is on the right track, they're probably using poor drivers. There's no way 4870x2 can beat a 5870, even if 5870 has higher image quality or whatnot. 4870 cf and and lower clockspeeds cannot compare with a card that should be faster than 4890cf, which is already faster than 4870x2 by a nice margin. I'm waiting for anand's review...
Core i7 920 3849B028 4.2ghz cooled by ek hf | 6gb stt ddr3 2100 | MSI HD6950 cf cooled by ek fc | Evga x58 e760 Classified | 120gb G.Skill Phoenix Pro | Modded Rocketfish case + 1200w toughpower | mcp 655 pump + mcr 320 + black ice pro II
I guess we'll see... I'm trying to decide between 1 5870, 2 5850's, or 2 5870's depending on what's available/not. I ended up canceling my order for now for the single 5870 since I am unsure of what setup I want, and some of it depends on what's available.
Is it me, or the great majority of the performance tests in that review are done with AF turned off?!
i noticed AF off in a lot of tests too
did they take it down, not working for me...
edit: okay, it's back now
Last edited by jaredpace; 09-22-2009 at 02:39 PM.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Bring... bring the amber lamps.
Yeah, it just got taken down... even in many of the tests with AA on, AF was off for some reason.
I was sure I read somewhere about 5850... Can't find it anywhere now...
so I think you're right...
I just checked some previews and they all state 23th as launch date for both
sorry, my bad
Ps. I'm wating for 5850 also
but I'll wait a bit longer... for the price drop (I'm broke now & I bought a new GPU 4 months ago)
Last edited by oc550be; 09-22-2009 at 02:42 PM.
Great, first review! But I must say, I've not enough with this one. I'm with the others saying this: what's up with the AF off on so many tests? As I see it AF is at least as important as AA, probably more. I don't think the AF performance impact should be ignored this way in a review.
On the other hand, I love those power consumption measures: ~50W less than a GTX285 idle, wow! And ~25W less load! Not bad at all for a card ~50% more performant...
I don't like much the Tom's reviews, but if those preliminar results are seen again in the following reviews, this card is a great, great product. Awesome product if you ask me. Lovely. Let's see in other reviews. I'd like to know the OC headroom also, and with voltage tweaking due to the Volterra (but probably this is too much to ask for those kind of reviews).
I think that if you're a dual GPU user you shouldn't expect a change to a single GPU from the next generation to be a worthy change performance wise. It's kinda hoping that changing your high end card to a value card from the next generation is going to improve your performance (for example, 3870->4670 or 4870->5670). Power consumption and heat, or performance/price value in the time of launch are completely different things, of course, but performance wise...
Performance wise if you expect to have an improvement, you should be aiming to a card of the same market segment than yours: HD5870 X2, or a HD5870 CF.
That said, I don't see the need to change a GTX295. But I'm not the kind of people who changes hw that fast...
Last edited by Farinorco; 09-22-2009 at 03:01 PM.
I found a deactivated Asus 5870 on Newegg. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...-346-_-Product
CPU: Intel Q9450 @ 3.2ghz - TRUE Black with AS5
Case: Antec P182 Gun Metal
Motherboard: Asus Maximus II Formula 901 bios
RAM: Corsair XMS2 4GB DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) 4 4 4 12
GPU: Sapphire HD4870 512mb - Thermalright V2 + Enzotech BCC9 Ramsink
Sound: Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer Fatal1ty Professional Series omg edition
PSU: Corsair 750TX Power Supply
Monitor: Samsung T260 25.5"
OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64
I already sold my GTX295 in anticipation, can't say I'm disappointed . Despite playing at 2560x1600, I might just grab the 5870 1GB and be done with it. This HD 4350 is killing me and I can't wait for the 2GB versions (what's the ETA on them anyway?).
| Cooler Master 690 II Advanced | Corsair 620HX | Core i5-2500K @ 5.0GHz | Gigabyte Z68XP-UD4 | 2x4096MB G.Skill Sniper DDR3-2133 @ 2134MHz 10-11-10-30 @ 1.55V | 160GB Intel X-25 G2 | 2x 2TB Samsung EcoGreen F4 in RAID 1 | Gigabyte HD 7970 @ 1340MHz/1775MHz | Dell 30" 3007WFP-HC | H2O - XSPC RayStorm and Swiftech MCW82 on an MCP350 + XSPC Acrylic Top, XSPC RX240 and Swiftech MCR220 radiators.
Toms hardware gave some pretty freaky results. About equal to the GTX 295, but sometimes slower than the 4870X2, and a few times faster than GTX 285 SLI. This card looks like a beast, for sure, a very inconsistent beast.
ATI cards are generally very inconsistent. Because some games are nvidias meant to be played, so those are faster because of codes nvidia provides to speed it up.
Performance per watt is what is the most impressive. OBR and Benchzoner were right on the dot, generally slower than the gtx 295 but it can catch up to the 295 with enough resolution and enough AA enabled.
Performance doesn't impress me those that much because this would lose to cf4890s, because in half the cases its losing to cf4870s. Sure it could be drivers, but since this is rv7xx on steroids, I expected good performance from the get go.
However if a gt300 does exist I can see it slaughtering the 5870, and even if it is a couple hundred dollars more, it might be worth it.
Last edited by tajoh111; 09-22-2009 at 04:38 PM.
I can see the GT300 beat the 5870 because is still 3 months away and anything can happen. Although is going to cost you I'd be willing to pick up a 295 now for cheap I think to have a chance agains the GT300 it should at least be 150% more powerfull than the current GTX295
Last edited by Fafeifa; 09-22-2009 at 04:56 PM.
http://www.sweclockers.com/articles_...id=6195&page=1
Another review fellows...they are coming slowly, but coming... I just wanna see one about the 5850!
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Bring... bring the amber lamps.
interesting what this thing can do, wonder whats the real world heat output of a single card. toasty ok or hot hot
I am in the process of building a new rig and the only piece I don't have now is a video card. Been waiting a week for the 5850 but starting to think if it is worth $300 since I only game at max 1920x1200. Would picking up one of the current cheaper ATI or nVidia options be the best move?
I am starting to lean towards a 275 with a cheap physx card or a 4890. What do you guys think?
Bookmarks