Core i7 920 D0 B-batch (4.1) (Kinda Stable?) | DFI X58 T3eH8 (Fed up with its' issues, may get a new board soon) | Patriot 1600 (9-9-9-24) (for now) | XFX HD 4890 (971/1065) (for now) |
80GB X25-m G2 | WD 640GB | PCP&C 750 | Dell 2408 LCD | NEC 1970GX LCD | Win7 Pro | CoolerMaster ATCS 840 {Modded to reverse-ATX, WC'ing internal}
CPU Loop: MCP655 > HK 3.0 LT > ST 320 (3x Scythe G's) > ST Res >Pump
GPU Loop: MCP655 > MCW-60 > PA160 (1x YL D12SH) > ST Res > BIP 220 (2x YL D12SH) >Pump
reading through some threads and they use points as an incentive to get people to use certain clients. that would lead me to believe bigadv is very important if it has bonus points.
Any word on a windows client for these? I'd love to try my i7 on here for a bit.
Last time I checked they were doing good to get the A1 core working on windows, and A2 they were having no luck with which is needed...
i posted this a week or so ago in this section. http://folding.typepad.com/news/2009...d-clients.html
the desmond core scales much better with more atoms in the sim so it should be faster than A2 anyways.
For windows they definitely need to do something to speed it up compared to linux, I could take the same rig with a quad and put linux on it and get 800 more ppd than windows. It says "The main goal here was to make it MUCH easier to use" hopefully there is more to it than that. There is also a heck of boost in ppd in linux from A1 to A2 core...
Last edited by road-runner; 10-07-2009 at 04:45 AM.
RR, have you put one of your i7 rigs under a Kill-A-Watt to measure what the kW/H comes out to?
I'm seriously considering dumping my GX2 rigs for i7s if the kW/H is much, much more economical.
Figuring on about $800 in sunk cost per quad GX2 rig, each rig ends up costing $80/month in electricity, or an additional $320/month. That's also an additional $1k/quad-gx2-rig over the course of a year.
I saw a calculation of about 200W output for a dual QC E5335 IBM server producing 17k PPD. Extrapolating that for a 25k PPD, let's say the output is 300W (vs 900W for a quad GX2 rig) which works out to about $30/rig/month in electricity.
If bonus points continue to be awarded, then 4 25K PPD rigs costing $120/month in electricity would start to pay off (when considering the new i7 investment - electricity savings) in only 3-4 months.
Does my math work out?
Not to mention the cooling on an i7 is much, much quieter than 4 GX2 fans set to 100%
I have.
At 3.8GHz w/ just mobo, 6GB RAM, one HDD, and a basic PCI video card I'm pulling about 250W from the wall. WAY more eco friendly than the dual GX2s were (600-650W with the i7).
my points still arent registering. this is getting annoying. i would post logs of the upload but im in windows right now. everything is entered correctly. i didnt get any credit for the WU.
Kev, you should buy a Kill-a-Watt or similar to see at what point the power use moves off the linear too
My Biggest Fear Is When I die, My Wife Sells All My Stuff For What I Told Her I Paid For It.79 SB threads and 32 IB Threads across 4 rigs 111 threads Crunching!!
Required (as in, not optional).
i5 has zero chance of completing them in time to get bonus (and probably would not even make the deadline).
Stanford was adamant that they did not want anything less than 8 threads attempting these (and they even said they frown on virtual cores but the i7 when OCed would be sufficient).
I don't think hitting the deadline would be all too difficult, but to get bonus you'll have to make it in 3 days I think. As a comparison, my i7@4.2GHz takes everywhere from 2 days 2hrs - 8 hrs depending on workunit and what I'm doing on that rig. I think you need at least 3.8GHz for a single i7, and you need it with HT. I assume memory speed also plays it's part (you have around 420MB memory usage per thread), but there's no solid numbers on that.
Scheduler performance is a very important topic on these units, your frame times with the same kernel can differ a good 3-5 minutes per frame depending on what scheduler you're using (all the more important if you're running GPU's at the same time).
Anyways, for everyone willing to attempt this, do not format the work partition as ext4, use ext3!
Last edited by p2501; 10-22-2009 at 10:22 AM. Reason: spelling
Bookmarks